Cargando…

Instituting systems-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement: a curriculum of inquiry

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires that training programs integrate system-based practice (SBP) and practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) into internal medicine residency curricula. CONTEXT AND SETTING: We instituted a seminar series and ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilper, Andrew P., Smith, Curtis Scott, Weppner, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3776321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24044686
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.21612
_version_ 1782477470526603264
author Wilper, Andrew P.
Smith, Curtis Scott
Weppner, William
author_facet Wilper, Andrew P.
Smith, Curtis Scott
Weppner, William
author_sort Wilper, Andrew P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires that training programs integrate system-based practice (SBP) and practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) into internal medicine residency curricula. CONTEXT AND SETTING: We instituted a seminar series and year-long-mentored curriculum designed to engage internal medicine residents in these competencies. METHODS: Residents participate in a seminar series that includes assigned reading and structured discussion with faculty who assist in the development of quality improvement or research projects. Residents pursue projects over the remainder of the year. Monthly works in progress meetings, protected time for inquiry, and continued faculty mentorship guide the residents in their project development. Trainees present their work at hospital-wide grand rounds at the end of the academic year. We performed a survey of residents to assess their self-reported knowledge, attitudes and skills in SBP and PBLI. In addition, blinded faculty scored projects for appropriateness, impact, and feasibility. OUTCOMES: We measured resident self-reported knowledge, attitudes, and skills at the end of the academic year. We found evidence that participants improved their understanding of the context in which they were practicing, and that their ability to engage in quality improvement projects increased. Blinded faculty reviewers favorably ranked the projects’ feasibility, impact, and appropriateness. The ‘Curriculum of Inquiry’ generated 11 quality improvement and research projects during the study period. Barriers to the ongoing work include a limited supply of mentors and delays due to Institutional Review Board approval. Hospital leadership recognizes the importance of the curriculum, and our accreditation manager now cites our ongoing work. CONCLUSIONS: A structured residency-based curriculum facilitates resident demonstration of SBP and practice-based learning and improvement. Residents gain knowledge and skills though this enterprise and hospitals gain access to trainees who help to solve ongoing problems and meet accreditation requirements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3776321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37763212013-09-18 Instituting systems-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement: a curriculum of inquiry Wilper, Andrew P. Smith, Curtis Scott Weppner, William Med Educ Online Trend Article BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires that training programs integrate system-based practice (SBP) and practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) into internal medicine residency curricula. CONTEXT AND SETTING: We instituted a seminar series and year-long-mentored curriculum designed to engage internal medicine residents in these competencies. METHODS: Residents participate in a seminar series that includes assigned reading and structured discussion with faculty who assist in the development of quality improvement or research projects. Residents pursue projects over the remainder of the year. Monthly works in progress meetings, protected time for inquiry, and continued faculty mentorship guide the residents in their project development. Trainees present their work at hospital-wide grand rounds at the end of the academic year. We performed a survey of residents to assess their self-reported knowledge, attitudes and skills in SBP and PBLI. In addition, blinded faculty scored projects for appropriateness, impact, and feasibility. OUTCOMES: We measured resident self-reported knowledge, attitudes, and skills at the end of the academic year. We found evidence that participants improved their understanding of the context in which they were practicing, and that their ability to engage in quality improvement projects increased. Blinded faculty reviewers favorably ranked the projects’ feasibility, impact, and appropriateness. The ‘Curriculum of Inquiry’ generated 11 quality improvement and research projects during the study period. Barriers to the ongoing work include a limited supply of mentors and delays due to Institutional Review Board approval. Hospital leadership recognizes the importance of the curriculum, and our accreditation manager now cites our ongoing work. CONCLUSIONS: A structured residency-based curriculum facilitates resident demonstration of SBP and practice-based learning and improvement. Residents gain knowledge and skills though this enterprise and hospitals gain access to trainees who help to solve ongoing problems and meet accreditation requirements. Co-Action Publishing 2013-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3776321/ /pubmed/24044686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.21612 Text en © 2013 Andrew P. Wilper et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Trend Article
Wilper, Andrew P.
Smith, Curtis Scott
Weppner, William
Instituting systems-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement: a curriculum of inquiry
title Instituting systems-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement: a curriculum of inquiry
title_full Instituting systems-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement: a curriculum of inquiry
title_fullStr Instituting systems-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement: a curriculum of inquiry
title_full_unstemmed Instituting systems-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement: a curriculum of inquiry
title_short Instituting systems-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement: a curriculum of inquiry
title_sort instituting systems-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement: a curriculum of inquiry
topic Trend Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3776321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24044686
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.21612
work_keys_str_mv AT wilperandrewp institutingsystemsbasedpracticeandpracticebasedlearningandimprovementacurriculumofinquiry
AT smithcurtisscott institutingsystemsbasedpracticeandpracticebasedlearningandimprovementacurriculumofinquiry
AT weppnerwilliam institutingsystemsbasedpracticeandpracticebasedlearningandimprovementacurriculumofinquiry