Cargando…

E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia

E-readers are fast rivaling print as a dominant method for reading. Because they offer accessibility options that are impossible in print, they are potentially beneficial for those with impairments, such as dyslexia. Yet, little is known about how the use of these devices influences reading in those...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneps, Matthew H., Thomson, Jenny M., Chen, Chen, Sonnert, Gerhard, Pomplun, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3776763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24058697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075634
_version_ 1782284878094532608
author Schneps, Matthew H.
Thomson, Jenny M.
Chen, Chen
Sonnert, Gerhard
Pomplun, Marc
author_facet Schneps, Matthew H.
Thomson, Jenny M.
Chen, Chen
Sonnert, Gerhard
Pomplun, Marc
author_sort Schneps, Matthew H.
collection PubMed
description E-readers are fast rivaling print as a dominant method for reading. Because they offer accessibility options that are impossible in print, they are potentially beneficial for those with impairments, such as dyslexia. Yet, little is known about how the use of these devices influences reading in those who struggle. Here, we observe reading comprehension and speed in 103 high school students with dyslexia. Reading on paper was compared with reading on a small handheld e-reader device, formatted to display few words per line. We found that use of the device significantly improved speed and comprehension, when compared with traditional presentations on paper for specific subsets of these individuals: Those who struggled most with phoneme decoding or efficient sight word reading read more rapidly using the device, and those with limited VA Spans gained in comprehension. Prior eye tracking studies demonstrated that short lines facilitate reading in dyslexia, suggesting that it is the use of short lines (and not the device per se) that leads to the observed benefits. We propose that these findings may be understood as a consequence of visual attention deficits, in some with dyslexia, that make it difficult to allocate attention to uncrowded text near fixation, as the gaze advances during reading. Short lines ameliorate this by guiding attention to the uncrowded span.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3776763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37767632013-09-20 E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia Schneps, Matthew H. Thomson, Jenny M. Chen, Chen Sonnert, Gerhard Pomplun, Marc PLoS One Research Article E-readers are fast rivaling print as a dominant method for reading. Because they offer accessibility options that are impossible in print, they are potentially beneficial for those with impairments, such as dyslexia. Yet, little is known about how the use of these devices influences reading in those who struggle. Here, we observe reading comprehension and speed in 103 high school students with dyslexia. Reading on paper was compared with reading on a small handheld e-reader device, formatted to display few words per line. We found that use of the device significantly improved speed and comprehension, when compared with traditional presentations on paper for specific subsets of these individuals: Those who struggled most with phoneme decoding or efficient sight word reading read more rapidly using the device, and those with limited VA Spans gained in comprehension. Prior eye tracking studies demonstrated that short lines facilitate reading in dyslexia, suggesting that it is the use of short lines (and not the device per se) that leads to the observed benefits. We propose that these findings may be understood as a consequence of visual attention deficits, in some with dyslexia, that make it difficult to allocate attention to uncrowded text near fixation, as the gaze advances during reading. Short lines ameliorate this by guiding attention to the uncrowded span. Public Library of Science 2013-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3776763/ /pubmed/24058697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075634 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schneps, Matthew H.
Thomson, Jenny M.
Chen, Chen
Sonnert, Gerhard
Pomplun, Marc
E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia
title E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia
title_full E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia
title_fullStr E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia
title_full_unstemmed E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia
title_short E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia
title_sort e-readers are more effective than paper for some with dyslexia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3776763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24058697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075634
work_keys_str_mv AT schnepsmatthewh ereadersaremoreeffectivethanpaperforsomewithdyslexia
AT thomsonjennym ereadersaremoreeffectivethanpaperforsomewithdyslexia
AT chenchen ereadersaremoreeffectivethanpaperforsomewithdyslexia
AT sonnertgerhard ereadersaremoreeffectivethanpaperforsomewithdyslexia
AT pomplunmarc ereadersaremoreeffectivethanpaperforsomewithdyslexia