Cargando…
Powerline bioactivity - more than magnetism
BACKGROUND: Previous work on the possible public health impact of electricity utilization has mostly considered low frequency electromagnetic fields, particularly those associated with high voltage overhead powerlines, but no generally accepted biological mechanism has been proposed. The present stu...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3777017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24058895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-454 |
_version_ | 1782284928904331264 |
---|---|
author | Sidaway, G Hugh |
author_facet | Sidaway, G Hugh |
author_sort | Sidaway, G Hugh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous work on the possible public health impact of electricity utilization has mostly considered low frequency electromagnetic fields, particularly those associated with high voltage overhead powerlines, but no generally accepted biological mechanism has been proposed. The present study seeks to expand the area of debate to include airborne electroactivity. FINDINGS: From a literature survey it is concluded that there is statistically significant published evidence consistent with the involvement of airborne electroactive agents in the powerline proximity modulation of some cytokine activity. Attention is drawn to overhead line fault associated corona discharge action as a source of potentially bioactive agents deserving careful study in view of the widespread close residential proximity to overhead power distribution lines in many countries. Particular attention is given to the role of electricity access associated faults as a possible explanation for the high childhood leukaemia rates in certain districts of Mexico City. CONCLUSIONS: Despite more than 30 years research worldwide there is no generally accepted biological mechanism to explain the adverse health impact of overhead powerline residential proximity. Expanding the area of consideration to include airborne electroactivity may provide the basis for a plausible outline model of such a mechanism. More attention should be given to this research area. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-454) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3777017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37770172013-09-20 Powerline bioactivity - more than magnetism Sidaway, G Hugh Springerplus Short Report BACKGROUND: Previous work on the possible public health impact of electricity utilization has mostly considered low frequency electromagnetic fields, particularly those associated with high voltage overhead powerlines, but no generally accepted biological mechanism has been proposed. The present study seeks to expand the area of debate to include airborne electroactivity. FINDINGS: From a literature survey it is concluded that there is statistically significant published evidence consistent with the involvement of airborne electroactive agents in the powerline proximity modulation of some cytokine activity. Attention is drawn to overhead line fault associated corona discharge action as a source of potentially bioactive agents deserving careful study in view of the widespread close residential proximity to overhead power distribution lines in many countries. Particular attention is given to the role of electricity access associated faults as a possible explanation for the high childhood leukaemia rates in certain districts of Mexico City. CONCLUSIONS: Despite more than 30 years research worldwide there is no generally accepted biological mechanism to explain the adverse health impact of overhead powerline residential proximity. Expanding the area of consideration to include airborne electroactivity may provide the basis for a plausible outline model of such a mechanism. More attention should be given to this research area. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-454) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2013-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3777017/ /pubmed/24058895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-454 Text en © Sidaway; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Sidaway, G Hugh Powerline bioactivity - more than magnetism |
title | Powerline bioactivity - more than magnetism |
title_full | Powerline bioactivity - more than magnetism |
title_fullStr | Powerline bioactivity - more than magnetism |
title_full_unstemmed | Powerline bioactivity - more than magnetism |
title_short | Powerline bioactivity - more than magnetism |
title_sort | powerline bioactivity - more than magnetism |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3777017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24058895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sidawayghugh powerlinebioactivitymorethanmagnetism |