Cargando…

Prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter

PURPOSES: The present study investigated whether a combination of the thickness and hardness of muscles without muscle tension can be used to estimate muscle strength during knee extension in adult males and females. METHODS: Seventy-two males and thirty-three females, whose ages ranged from 18 to 3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muraki, Satoshi, Fukumoto, Kiyotaka, Fukuda, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3777021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24058896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-457
_version_ 1782284929919352832
author Muraki, Satoshi
Fukumoto, Kiyotaka
Fukuda, Osamu
author_facet Muraki, Satoshi
Fukumoto, Kiyotaka
Fukuda, Osamu
author_sort Muraki, Satoshi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSES: The present study investigated whether a combination of the thickness and hardness of muscles without muscle tension can be used to estimate muscle strength during knee extension in adult males and females. METHODS: Seventy-two males and thirty-three females, whose ages ranged from 18 to 35 years, participated in this study. We measured muscle thickness and hardness in the right anterior region of the thigh (rectus femoris muscle and vastus intermedius muscle) without muscle tension using an ultrasound muscle hardness meter, and the maximal voluntary isometric contraction of right knee extension (MVIC). The changing ratios (%) of the tissue thickness before compression to those during compression (compression ratio) are calculated as an index of the hardness. Higher ratio indicates a harder muscle compared with that of other individuals showing the same muscle thickness. RESULTS: In male group, although the MVIC had significantly positive correlation to both muscle thickness (r=0.412, p<0.01) and compression ratio (r=0.233, p<0.05), their variables also had correlation mutually. In the female group, the MVIC has significantly positive correlation to only compression ratio (r=0.499, p<0.01), not muscle thickness (r=0.225, n.s.). On multiple linear regression analysis, the combination of two parameters (muscle thickness and compression ratio) allowed more accurate estimation of MVIC (r=0.573, p<0.01) in the female group. CONCLUSION: These findings suggested that the combination of muscle thickness and hardness is capable of effectively estimating muscle strength especially in females.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3777021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37770212013-09-20 Prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter Muraki, Satoshi Fukumoto, Kiyotaka Fukuda, Osamu Springerplus Research PURPOSES: The present study investigated whether a combination of the thickness and hardness of muscles without muscle tension can be used to estimate muscle strength during knee extension in adult males and females. METHODS: Seventy-two males and thirty-three females, whose ages ranged from 18 to 35 years, participated in this study. We measured muscle thickness and hardness in the right anterior region of the thigh (rectus femoris muscle and vastus intermedius muscle) without muscle tension using an ultrasound muscle hardness meter, and the maximal voluntary isometric contraction of right knee extension (MVIC). The changing ratios (%) of the tissue thickness before compression to those during compression (compression ratio) are calculated as an index of the hardness. Higher ratio indicates a harder muscle compared with that of other individuals showing the same muscle thickness. RESULTS: In male group, although the MVIC had significantly positive correlation to both muscle thickness (r=0.412, p<0.01) and compression ratio (r=0.233, p<0.05), their variables also had correlation mutually. In the female group, the MVIC has significantly positive correlation to only compression ratio (r=0.499, p<0.01), not muscle thickness (r=0.225, n.s.). On multiple linear regression analysis, the combination of two parameters (muscle thickness and compression ratio) allowed more accurate estimation of MVIC (r=0.573, p<0.01) in the female group. CONCLUSION: These findings suggested that the combination of muscle thickness and hardness is capable of effectively estimating muscle strength especially in females. Springer International Publishing 2013-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3777021/ /pubmed/24058896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-457 Text en © Muraki et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Muraki, Satoshi
Fukumoto, Kiyotaka
Fukuda, Osamu
Prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter
title Prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter
title_full Prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter
title_fullStr Prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter
title_short Prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter
title_sort prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3777021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24058896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-457
work_keys_str_mv AT murakisatoshi predictionofthemusclestrengthbythemusclethicknessandhardnessusingultrasoundmusclehardnessmeter
AT fukumotokiyotaka predictionofthemusclestrengthbythemusclethicknessandhardnessusingultrasoundmusclehardnessmeter
AT fukudaosamu predictionofthemusclestrengthbythemusclethicknessandhardnessusingultrasoundmusclehardnessmeter