Cargando…

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation

BACKGROUND: The patient-rated elbow evaluation (PREE) is a joint-specific, self-administered questionnaire consisting of a pain scale (PREE-P) and a functional scale (PREE-F), the latter consisting of specific function (PREE-SF) and usual function (PREE-UF). The purpose of this study was to cross-cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanyu, Tadamasa, Watanabe, Mikihiko, Masatomi, Takashi, Nishida, Keiichiro, Nakagawa, Teruhiko, Nishiura, Yasumasa, Ohi, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3778217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23749174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0408-z
_version_ 1782285072164978688
author Hanyu, Tadamasa
Watanabe, Mikihiko
Masatomi, Takashi
Nishida, Keiichiro
Nakagawa, Teruhiko
Nishiura, Yasumasa
Ohi, Hiroyuki
author_facet Hanyu, Tadamasa
Watanabe, Mikihiko
Masatomi, Takashi
Nishida, Keiichiro
Nakagawa, Teruhiko
Nishiura, Yasumasa
Ohi, Hiroyuki
author_sort Hanyu, Tadamasa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The patient-rated elbow evaluation (PREE) is a joint-specific, self-administered questionnaire consisting of a pain scale (PREE-P) and a functional scale (PREE-F), the latter consisting of specific function (PREE-SF) and usual function (PREE-UF). The purpose of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the PREE into Japanese (PREE-J) and to test its reliability, validity, and responsiveness. METHODS: A consecutive series of 74 patients with elbow disorder completed the PREE-J, the Japanese version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH–JSSH) questionnaire, and the official Japanese version of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Of the 74 patients, 53 were reassessed for test–retest reliability 1 or 2 weeks later. Reliability was investigated in terms of reproducibility and internal consistency. The validity of the PREE-J was examined by factor analysis, and correlation coefficients were obtained using the PREE-J, DASH-JSSH, and SF-36. Responsiveness was examined by calculating the standardized response mean (SRM) and effect size after elbow surgery in 53 patients. RESULTS: Cronbach’s α coefficients for PREE-P, PREE-F, and PREE were 0.92, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively, and the corresponding intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.92, 0.93, and 0.94, respectively. Unidimensionality of PREE-P and PREE-F was confirmed by factor analysis. The coefficients of correlation between PREE-P and PREE-F or DASH–JSSH were 0.81 and 0.74, respectively; that between PREE-F and DASH–JSSH was 0.86, and those between DASH–JSSH and PREE-SF or PREE-UF were 0.85 and 0.82, respectively. Moderate correlation was observed in “physical functioning” for SF-36 and PREE-F (r = −0.69) or PREE (r = −0.68). The SRMs/effect sizes of PREE-P (1.31/1.32) or PREE (1.28/1.12) were more responsive than the DASH–JSSH (0.99/0.85), “bodily pain” (−1.15/−1.43), and “physical functioning” (−0.70/−0.44) in SF-36. CONCLUSION: The PREE-J represents a reliable, valid, and responsive instrument and has evaluation capacities equivalent to those of the original PREE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3778217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37782172013-09-25 Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation Hanyu, Tadamasa Watanabe, Mikihiko Masatomi, Takashi Nishida, Keiichiro Nakagawa, Teruhiko Nishiura, Yasumasa Ohi, Hiroyuki J Orthop Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: The patient-rated elbow evaluation (PREE) is a joint-specific, self-administered questionnaire consisting of a pain scale (PREE-P) and a functional scale (PREE-F), the latter consisting of specific function (PREE-SF) and usual function (PREE-UF). The purpose of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the PREE into Japanese (PREE-J) and to test its reliability, validity, and responsiveness. METHODS: A consecutive series of 74 patients with elbow disorder completed the PREE-J, the Japanese version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH–JSSH) questionnaire, and the official Japanese version of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Of the 74 patients, 53 were reassessed for test–retest reliability 1 or 2 weeks later. Reliability was investigated in terms of reproducibility and internal consistency. The validity of the PREE-J was examined by factor analysis, and correlation coefficients were obtained using the PREE-J, DASH-JSSH, and SF-36. Responsiveness was examined by calculating the standardized response mean (SRM) and effect size after elbow surgery in 53 patients. RESULTS: Cronbach’s α coefficients for PREE-P, PREE-F, and PREE were 0.92, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively, and the corresponding intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.92, 0.93, and 0.94, respectively. Unidimensionality of PREE-P and PREE-F was confirmed by factor analysis. The coefficients of correlation between PREE-P and PREE-F or DASH–JSSH were 0.81 and 0.74, respectively; that between PREE-F and DASH–JSSH was 0.86, and those between DASH–JSSH and PREE-SF or PREE-UF were 0.85 and 0.82, respectively. Moderate correlation was observed in “physical functioning” for SF-36 and PREE-F (r = −0.69) or PREE (r = −0.68). The SRMs/effect sizes of PREE-P (1.31/1.32) or PREE (1.28/1.12) were more responsive than the DASH–JSSH (0.99/0.85), “bodily pain” (−1.15/−1.43), and “physical functioning” (−0.70/−0.44) in SF-36. CONCLUSION: The PREE-J represents a reliable, valid, and responsive instrument and has evaluation capacities equivalent to those of the original PREE. Springer Japan 2013-06-11 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3778217/ /pubmed/23749174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0408-z Text en © The Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2013
spellingShingle Original Article
Hanyu, Tadamasa
Watanabe, Mikihiko
Masatomi, Takashi
Nishida, Keiichiro
Nakagawa, Teruhiko
Nishiura, Yasumasa
Ohi, Hiroyuki
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation
title Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation
title_full Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation
title_fullStr Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation
title_short Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation
title_sort reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3778217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23749174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0408-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hanyutadamasa reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthejapaneseversionofthepatientratedelbowevaluation
AT watanabemikihiko reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthejapaneseversionofthepatientratedelbowevaluation
AT masatomitakashi reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthejapaneseversionofthepatientratedelbowevaluation
AT nishidakeiichiro reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthejapaneseversionofthepatientratedelbowevaluation
AT nakagawateruhiko reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthejapaneseversionofthepatientratedelbowevaluation
AT nishiurayasumasa reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthejapaneseversionofthepatientratedelbowevaluation
AT ohihiroyuki reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthejapaneseversionofthepatientratedelbowevaluation