Cargando…

Which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support?

BACKGROUND: Despite multidisciplinary tumour boards (MTBs), non-compliance with clinical practice guidelines is still observed for breast cancer patients. Computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) may improve the implementation of guidelines, but cases of non-compliance persist. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Séroussi, B, Laouénan, C, Gligorov, J, Uzan, S, Mentré, F, Bouaud, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3778303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23942076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.453
_version_ 1782285091946364928
author Séroussi, B
Laouénan, C
Gligorov, J
Uzan, S
Mentré, F
Bouaud, J
author_facet Séroussi, B
Laouénan, C
Gligorov, J
Uzan, S
Mentré, F
Bouaud, J
author_sort Séroussi, B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite multidisciplinary tumour boards (MTBs), non-compliance with clinical practice guidelines is still observed for breast cancer patients. Computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) may improve the implementation of guidelines, but cases of non-compliance persist. METHODS: OncoDoc2, a guideline-based decision support system, has been routinely used to remind MTB physicians of patient-specific recommended care plans. Non-compliant MTB decisions were analysed using a multivariate adjusted logistic regression model. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2009, 1624 decisions for invasive breast cancers with a global non-compliance rate of 8.3% were analysed. Patient factors associated with non-compliance were age>80 years (odds ratio (OR): 7.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7–15.7) in pre-surgical decisions; microinvasive tumour (OR: 5.2; 95% CI: 1.5–17.5), surgical discovery of microinvasion in addition to a unique invasive tumour (OR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.4–12.5), and prior neoadjuvant treatment (OR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.1–15.1) in decisions with recommendation of re-excision; age<35 years (OR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.9–11.4), positive hormonal receptors with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression (OR: 15.7; 95% CI: 3.1–78.7), and the absence of prior axillary surgery (OR: 17.2; 95% CI: 5.1–58.1) in adjuvant decisions. CONCLUSION: Residual non-compliance despite the use of OncoDoc2 illustrates the need to question the clinical profiles where evidence is missing. These findings challenge the weaknesses of guideline content rather than the use of CDSSs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3778303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37783032014-09-03 Which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support? Séroussi, B Laouénan, C Gligorov, J Uzan, S Mentré, F Bouaud, J Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Despite multidisciplinary tumour boards (MTBs), non-compliance with clinical practice guidelines is still observed for breast cancer patients. Computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) may improve the implementation of guidelines, but cases of non-compliance persist. METHODS: OncoDoc2, a guideline-based decision support system, has been routinely used to remind MTB physicians of patient-specific recommended care plans. Non-compliant MTB decisions were analysed using a multivariate adjusted logistic regression model. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2009, 1624 decisions for invasive breast cancers with a global non-compliance rate of 8.3% were analysed. Patient factors associated with non-compliance were age>80 years (odds ratio (OR): 7.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7–15.7) in pre-surgical decisions; microinvasive tumour (OR: 5.2; 95% CI: 1.5–17.5), surgical discovery of microinvasion in addition to a unique invasive tumour (OR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.4–12.5), and prior neoadjuvant treatment (OR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.1–15.1) in decisions with recommendation of re-excision; age<35 years (OR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.9–11.4), positive hormonal receptors with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression (OR: 15.7; 95% CI: 3.1–78.7), and the absence of prior axillary surgery (OR: 17.2; 95% CI: 5.1–58.1) in adjuvant decisions. CONCLUSION: Residual non-compliance despite the use of OncoDoc2 illustrates the need to question the clinical profiles where evidence is missing. These findings challenge the weaknesses of guideline content rather than the use of CDSSs. Nature Publishing Group 2013-09-03 2013-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3778303/ /pubmed/23942076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.453 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Séroussi, B
Laouénan, C
Gligorov, J
Uzan, S
Mentré, F
Bouaud, J
Which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support?
title Which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support?
title_full Which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support?
title_fullStr Which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support?
title_full_unstemmed Which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support?
title_short Which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support?
title_sort which breast cancer decisions remain non-compliant with guidelines despite the use of computerised decision support?
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3778303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23942076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.453
work_keys_str_mv AT seroussib whichbreastcancerdecisionsremainnoncompliantwithguidelinesdespitetheuseofcomputeriseddecisionsupport
AT laouenanc whichbreastcancerdecisionsremainnoncompliantwithguidelinesdespitetheuseofcomputeriseddecisionsupport
AT gligorovj whichbreastcancerdecisionsremainnoncompliantwithguidelinesdespitetheuseofcomputeriseddecisionsupport
AT uzans whichbreastcancerdecisionsremainnoncompliantwithguidelinesdespitetheuseofcomputeriseddecisionsupport
AT mentref whichbreastcancerdecisionsremainnoncompliantwithguidelinesdespitetheuseofcomputeriseddecisionsupport
AT bouaudj whichbreastcancerdecisionsremainnoncompliantwithguidelinesdespitetheuseofcomputeriseddecisionsupport