Cargando…

Do cortical gamma oscillations promote or suppress perception? An under-asked question with an over-assumed answer

Cortical gamma oscillations occur alongside perceptual processes, and in proportion to perceptual salience. They have a number of properties that make them ideal candidates to explain perception, including incorporating synchronized discharges of neural assemblies, and their emergence over a fast ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sedley, William, Cunningham, Mark O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3778316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24065913
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00595
_version_ 1782285095803027456
author Sedley, William
Cunningham, Mark O.
author_facet Sedley, William
Cunningham, Mark O.
author_sort Sedley, William
collection PubMed
description Cortical gamma oscillations occur alongside perceptual processes, and in proportion to perceptual salience. They have a number of properties that make them ideal candidates to explain perception, including incorporating synchronized discharges of neural assemblies, and their emergence over a fast timescale consistent with that of perception. These observations have led to widespread assumptions that gamma oscillations' role is to cause or facilitate conscious perception (i.e., a “positive” role). While the majority of the human literature on gamma oscillations is consistent with this interpretation, many or most of these studies could equally be interpreted as showing a suppressive or inhibitory (i.e., “negative”) role. For example, presenting a stimulus and recording a response of increased gamma oscillations would only suggest a role for gamma oscillations in the representation of that stimulus, and would not specify what that role were; if gamma oscillations were inhibitory, then they would become selectively activated in response to the stimulus they acted to inhibit. In this review, we consider two classes of gamma oscillations: “broadband” and “narrowband,” which have very different properties (and likely roles). We first discuss studies on gamma oscillations that are non-discriminatory, with respect to the role of gamma oscillations, followed by studies that specifically support specifically a positive or negative role. These include work on perception in healthy individuals, and in the pathological contexts of phantom perception and epilepsy. Reference is based as much as possible on magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) studies, but we also consider evidence from invasive recordings in humans and other animals. Attempts are made to reconcile findings within a common framework. We conclude with a summary of the pertinent questions that remain unanswered, and suggest how future studies might address these.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3778316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37783162013-09-24 Do cortical gamma oscillations promote or suppress perception? An under-asked question with an over-assumed answer Sedley, William Cunningham, Mark O. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Cortical gamma oscillations occur alongside perceptual processes, and in proportion to perceptual salience. They have a number of properties that make them ideal candidates to explain perception, including incorporating synchronized discharges of neural assemblies, and their emergence over a fast timescale consistent with that of perception. These observations have led to widespread assumptions that gamma oscillations' role is to cause or facilitate conscious perception (i.e., a “positive” role). While the majority of the human literature on gamma oscillations is consistent with this interpretation, many or most of these studies could equally be interpreted as showing a suppressive or inhibitory (i.e., “negative”) role. For example, presenting a stimulus and recording a response of increased gamma oscillations would only suggest a role for gamma oscillations in the representation of that stimulus, and would not specify what that role were; if gamma oscillations were inhibitory, then they would become selectively activated in response to the stimulus they acted to inhibit. In this review, we consider two classes of gamma oscillations: “broadband” and “narrowband,” which have very different properties (and likely roles). We first discuss studies on gamma oscillations that are non-discriminatory, with respect to the role of gamma oscillations, followed by studies that specifically support specifically a positive or negative role. These include work on perception in healthy individuals, and in the pathological contexts of phantom perception and epilepsy. Reference is based as much as possible on magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) studies, but we also consider evidence from invasive recordings in humans and other animals. Attempts are made to reconcile findings within a common framework. We conclude with a summary of the pertinent questions that remain unanswered, and suggest how future studies might address these. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3778316/ /pubmed/24065913 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00595 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sedley and Cunningham. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Sedley, William
Cunningham, Mark O.
Do cortical gamma oscillations promote or suppress perception? An under-asked question with an over-assumed answer
title Do cortical gamma oscillations promote or suppress perception? An under-asked question with an over-assumed answer
title_full Do cortical gamma oscillations promote or suppress perception? An under-asked question with an over-assumed answer
title_fullStr Do cortical gamma oscillations promote or suppress perception? An under-asked question with an over-assumed answer
title_full_unstemmed Do cortical gamma oscillations promote or suppress perception? An under-asked question with an over-assumed answer
title_short Do cortical gamma oscillations promote or suppress perception? An under-asked question with an over-assumed answer
title_sort do cortical gamma oscillations promote or suppress perception? an under-asked question with an over-assumed answer
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3778316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24065913
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00595
work_keys_str_mv AT sedleywilliam docorticalgammaoscillationspromoteorsuppressperceptionanunderaskedquestionwithanoverassumedanswer
AT cunninghammarko docorticalgammaoscillationspromoteorsuppressperceptionanunderaskedquestionwithanoverassumedanswer