Cargando…

Experiences of experts about the instances of plagiarism

INTRODUCTION: Plagiarism is defined as intentional deceiving or lack of honesty, which deprives others from both material and spiritual possessions. Ethics is considered as one of the most important aspects of evaluating the quality of higher education. Moreover, scientific ethics should be reflecte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keyvanara, Mahmod, Ojaghi, Rezvan, Sohrabi, Mozafar Cheshmeh, Papi, Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3778572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24083282
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.115817
_version_ 1782285127730069504
author Keyvanara, Mahmod
Ojaghi, Rezvan
Sohrabi, Mozafar Cheshmeh
Papi, Ahmad
author_facet Keyvanara, Mahmod
Ojaghi, Rezvan
Sohrabi, Mozafar Cheshmeh
Papi, Ahmad
author_sort Keyvanara, Mahmod
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Plagiarism is defined as intentional deceiving or lack of honesty, which deprives others from both material and spiritual possessions. Ethics is considered as one of the most important aspects of evaluating the quality of higher education. Moreover, scientific ethics should be reflected from university values, as a specialized institution, rather than being a reflection of the others cares. Therefore, the main aim of the present study is explore of expert experiences about plagiarism in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study employed qualitative method with using in-deep interview. The research participants consisted of 21, who tend to this work. Semi structure interview were conducted and recorded. The method of analyzing data was ‘thematic analysis’. The data were transcribed and saved on computer after each interview. Themes and sub-themes were extracted. Finally, relevant sub-themes were arranged in a category and suggested were presented. RESULT: Analyzing data showed 600 primary codes, 40 sub-themes and 6 themes. The main themes included repeated works, non-normative adoption, non-normative adaptation, shares distribution, forging, and profit-seeking, each of which consisted of one or several subgroups. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study show that since, there are numerous ways of cheating, the universities’ research committees must create institutions in order to educate the individuals how to avoid plagiarism. In addition, providing information about different types of scientific violations, as well as their following punishments might lead to the decrease of such misbehaviors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3778572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37785722013-09-30 Experiences of experts about the instances of plagiarism Keyvanara, Mahmod Ojaghi, Rezvan Sohrabi, Mozafar Cheshmeh Papi, Ahmad J Educ Health Promot Original Article INTRODUCTION: Plagiarism is defined as intentional deceiving or lack of honesty, which deprives others from both material and spiritual possessions. Ethics is considered as one of the most important aspects of evaluating the quality of higher education. Moreover, scientific ethics should be reflected from university values, as a specialized institution, rather than being a reflection of the others cares. Therefore, the main aim of the present study is explore of expert experiences about plagiarism in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study employed qualitative method with using in-deep interview. The research participants consisted of 21, who tend to this work. Semi structure interview were conducted and recorded. The method of analyzing data was ‘thematic analysis’. The data were transcribed and saved on computer after each interview. Themes and sub-themes were extracted. Finally, relevant sub-themes were arranged in a category and suggested were presented. RESULT: Analyzing data showed 600 primary codes, 40 sub-themes and 6 themes. The main themes included repeated works, non-normative adoption, non-normative adaptation, shares distribution, forging, and profit-seeking, each of which consisted of one or several subgroups. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study show that since, there are numerous ways of cheating, the universities’ research committees must create institutions in order to educate the individuals how to avoid plagiarism. In addition, providing information about different types of scientific violations, as well as their following punishments might lead to the decrease of such misbehaviors. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3778572/ /pubmed/24083282 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.115817 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Keyvanara M http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Keyvanara, Mahmod
Ojaghi, Rezvan
Sohrabi, Mozafar Cheshmeh
Papi, Ahmad
Experiences of experts about the instances of plagiarism
title Experiences of experts about the instances of plagiarism
title_full Experiences of experts about the instances of plagiarism
title_fullStr Experiences of experts about the instances of plagiarism
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of experts about the instances of plagiarism
title_short Experiences of experts about the instances of plagiarism
title_sort experiences of experts about the instances of plagiarism
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3778572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24083282
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.115817
work_keys_str_mv AT keyvanaramahmod experiencesofexpertsabouttheinstancesofplagiarism
AT ojaghirezvan experiencesofexpertsabouttheinstancesofplagiarism
AT sohrabimozafarcheshmeh experiencesofexpertsabouttheinstancesofplagiarism
AT papiahmad experiencesofexpertsabouttheinstancesofplagiarism