Cargando…

Evaluation of push-out bond strength of two fiber-reinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro

INTRODUCTION: The concept of using a “post” for the restoration of teeth has been practiced to restore the endodontically treated tooth. Metallic posts have been commonly used, but their delirious effects have led to the development of fiber-reinforced materials that have overcome the limitations of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kadam, Ajay, Pujar, Madhu, Patil, Chetan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3778628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082575
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.117522
_version_ 1782285140648525824
author Kadam, Ajay
Pujar, Madhu
Patil, Chetan
author_facet Kadam, Ajay
Pujar, Madhu
Patil, Chetan
author_sort Kadam, Ajay
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The concept of using a “post” for the restoration of teeth has been practiced to restore the endodontically treated tooth. Metallic posts have been commonly used, but their delirious effects have led to the development of fiber-reinforced materials that have overcome the limitations of metallic posts. The use of glass and quartz fibers was proposed as an alternative to the dark color of carbon fiber posts as far as esthetics was concerned. “Debonding” is the most common failure in fiber-reinforced composite type of posts. This study was aimed to compare the push-out bond strength of a self-adhesive dual-cured luting agent (RelyX U100) with a total etch resin luting agent (Variolink II) used to cement two different FRC posts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty human maxillary anterior single-rooted teeth were decoronated, endodontically treated, post space prepared and divided into four groups (n = 20); Group I: D.T. light post (RTD) and Variolink II (Ivoclare vivadent), Group II: D.T. light post (RTD) and RelyX U100 (3M ESPE), Group III: Glassix post (Nordin) and Variolink II (Ivoclare vivadent) and Group IV: Glassix post (Nordin) and RelyX U100 (3M ESPE). Each root was sectioned to get slices of 2 ± 0.05-mm thickness. Push-out tests were performed using a triaxial loading frame. To express bond strength in megapascals (Mpa), load value recorded in Newton (N) was divided by the area of the bonded interface. After testing the push-out strengths, the samples were analyzed under a stereomicroscope. RESULTS: The mean values of the push-out bond strength show that Group I and Group III had significantly higher values than Group II and Group IV. The most common mode of failure observed was adhesive between dentin and luting material and between post and luting material. CONCLUSIONS: The mean push-out bond strengths were higher for Groups I and III where Variolink II resin cement was used for luting the fiber post, which is based on the total etch adhesive approach. In most of the samples, failure was observed between cement–dentine interface, followed by post–cement interface, which shows difficulty in bonding between post–cement–dentine interface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3778628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37786282013-09-30 Evaluation of push-out bond strength of two fiber-reinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro Kadam, Ajay Pujar, Madhu Patil, Chetan J Conserv Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION: The concept of using a “post” for the restoration of teeth has been practiced to restore the endodontically treated tooth. Metallic posts have been commonly used, but their delirious effects have led to the development of fiber-reinforced materials that have overcome the limitations of metallic posts. The use of glass and quartz fibers was proposed as an alternative to the dark color of carbon fiber posts as far as esthetics was concerned. “Debonding” is the most common failure in fiber-reinforced composite type of posts. This study was aimed to compare the push-out bond strength of a self-adhesive dual-cured luting agent (RelyX U100) with a total etch resin luting agent (Variolink II) used to cement two different FRC posts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty human maxillary anterior single-rooted teeth were decoronated, endodontically treated, post space prepared and divided into four groups (n = 20); Group I: D.T. light post (RTD) and Variolink II (Ivoclare vivadent), Group II: D.T. light post (RTD) and RelyX U100 (3M ESPE), Group III: Glassix post (Nordin) and Variolink II (Ivoclare vivadent) and Group IV: Glassix post (Nordin) and RelyX U100 (3M ESPE). Each root was sectioned to get slices of 2 ± 0.05-mm thickness. Push-out tests were performed using a triaxial loading frame. To express bond strength in megapascals (Mpa), load value recorded in Newton (N) was divided by the area of the bonded interface. After testing the push-out strengths, the samples were analyzed under a stereomicroscope. RESULTS: The mean values of the push-out bond strength show that Group I and Group III had significantly higher values than Group II and Group IV. The most common mode of failure observed was adhesive between dentin and luting material and between post and luting material. CONCLUSIONS: The mean push-out bond strengths were higher for Groups I and III where Variolink II resin cement was used for luting the fiber post, which is based on the total etch adhesive approach. In most of the samples, failure was observed between cement–dentine interface, followed by post–cement interface, which shows difficulty in bonding between post–cement–dentine interface. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3778628/ /pubmed/24082575 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.117522 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kadam, Ajay
Pujar, Madhu
Patil, Chetan
Evaluation of push-out bond strength of two fiber-reinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro
title Evaluation of push-out bond strength of two fiber-reinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro
title_full Evaluation of push-out bond strength of two fiber-reinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro
title_fullStr Evaluation of push-out bond strength of two fiber-reinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of push-out bond strength of two fiber-reinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro
title_short Evaluation of push-out bond strength of two fiber-reinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro
title_sort evaluation of push-out bond strength of two fiber-reinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3778628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082575
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.117522
work_keys_str_mv AT kadamajay evaluationofpushoutbondstrengthoftwofiberreinforcedcompositepostssystemsusingtwolutingcementsinvitro
AT pujarmadhu evaluationofpushoutbondstrengthoftwofiberreinforcedcompositepostssystemsusingtwolutingcementsinvitro
AT patilchetan evaluationofpushoutbondstrengthoftwofiberreinforcedcompositepostssystemsusingtwolutingcementsinvitro