Cargando…
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
Background and aims. Present study was designed to compare the bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 (NAMTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM). Materials and methods. Thirty specimens of each CEM, NAM...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082988 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.026 |
_version_ | 1782285237255929856 |
---|---|
author | Ajami, Amir Ahmad Jafari Navimipour, Elmira Savadi Oskoee, Siavash Abed Kahnamoui, Mehdi Lotfi, Mehrdad Daneshpooy, Mehdi |
author_facet | Ajami, Amir Ahmad Jafari Navimipour, Elmira Savadi Oskoee, Siavash Abed Kahnamoui, Mehdi Lotfi, Mehrdad Daneshpooy, Mehdi |
author_sort | Ajami, Amir Ahmad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and aims. Present study was designed to compare the bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 (NAMTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM). Materials and methods. Thirty specimens of each CEM, NAMTA, and MTA were prepared. Composite and RMGI restorations were then placed on the samples (15 samples in six subgroups). Shear bond strength was assessed using universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test. To compare the bond strength in subgroups, one-away ANOVA was applied. Significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results. Bond strength was significantly higher to composite samples compared to RMGI samples (p<0.001). The difference in bond strength of composite samples between MTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.026) as well as MTA and NAMTA subgroups (P= 0.019) was significant, but the difference between NAMTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.56) was not significant. The differences in bond strength in subgroups of RMGI group were not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion. Regarding shear bond strength to the tested substrates, composite was shown to be superior to RMGI. The bond of resin composite to MTA was weaker than that to CEM and NAMTA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3779376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37793762013-09-30 Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents Ajami, Amir Ahmad Jafari Navimipour, Elmira Savadi Oskoee, Siavash Abed Kahnamoui, Mehdi Lotfi, Mehrdad Daneshpooy, Mehdi J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background and aims. Present study was designed to compare the bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 (NAMTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM). Materials and methods. Thirty specimens of each CEM, NAMTA, and MTA were prepared. Composite and RMGI restorations were then placed on the samples (15 samples in six subgroups). Shear bond strength was assessed using universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test. To compare the bond strength in subgroups, one-away ANOVA was applied. Significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results. Bond strength was significantly higher to composite samples compared to RMGI samples (p<0.001). The difference in bond strength of composite samples between MTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.026) as well as MTA and NAMTA subgroups (P= 0.019) was significant, but the difference between NAMTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.56) was not significant. The differences in bond strength in subgroups of RMGI group were not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion. Regarding shear bond strength to the tested substrates, composite was shown to be superior to RMGI. The bond of resin composite to MTA was weaker than that to CEM and NAMTA. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2013 2013-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3779376/ /pubmed/24082988 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.026 Text en © 2013 The Authors; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ajami, Amir Ahmad Jafari Navimipour, Elmira Savadi Oskoee, Siavash Abed Kahnamoui, Mehdi Lotfi, Mehrdad Daneshpooy, Mehdi Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents |
title | Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents |
title_full | Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents |
title_short | Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents |
title_sort | comparison of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin to three pulp capping agents |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082988 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ajamiamirahmad comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents AT jafarinavimipourelmira comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents AT savadioskoeesiavash comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents AT abedkahnamouimehdi comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents AT lotfimehrdad comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents AT daneshpooymehdi comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents |