Cargando…

Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents

Background and aims. Present study was designed to compare the bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 (NAMTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM). Materials and methods. Thirty specimens of each CEM, NAM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ajami, Amir Ahmad, Jafari Navimipour, Elmira, Savadi Oskoee, Siavash, Abed Kahnamoui, Mehdi, Lotfi, Mehrdad, Daneshpooy, Mehdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082988
http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.026
_version_ 1782285237255929856
author Ajami, Amir Ahmad
Jafari Navimipour, Elmira
Savadi Oskoee, Siavash
Abed Kahnamoui, Mehdi
Lotfi, Mehrdad
Daneshpooy, Mehdi
author_facet Ajami, Amir Ahmad
Jafari Navimipour, Elmira
Savadi Oskoee, Siavash
Abed Kahnamoui, Mehdi
Lotfi, Mehrdad
Daneshpooy, Mehdi
author_sort Ajami, Amir Ahmad
collection PubMed
description Background and aims. Present study was designed to compare the bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 (NAMTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM). Materials and methods. Thirty specimens of each CEM, NAMTA, and MTA were prepared. Composite and RMGI restorations were then placed on the samples (15 samples in six subgroups). Shear bond strength was assessed using universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test. To compare the bond strength in subgroups, one-away ANOVA was applied. Significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results. Bond strength was significantly higher to composite samples compared to RMGI samples (p<0.001). The difference in bond strength of composite samples between MTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.026) as well as MTA and NAMTA subgroups (P= 0.019) was significant, but the difference between NAMTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.56) was not significant. The differences in bond strength in subgroups of RMGI group were not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion. Regarding shear bond strength to the tested substrates, composite was shown to be superior to RMGI. The bond of resin composite to MTA was weaker than that to CEM and NAMTA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3779376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37793762013-09-30 Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents Ajami, Amir Ahmad Jafari Navimipour, Elmira Savadi Oskoee, Siavash Abed Kahnamoui, Mehdi Lotfi, Mehrdad Daneshpooy, Mehdi J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background and aims. Present study was designed to compare the bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 (NAMTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM). Materials and methods. Thirty specimens of each CEM, NAMTA, and MTA were prepared. Composite and RMGI restorations were then placed on the samples (15 samples in six subgroups). Shear bond strength was assessed using universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test. To compare the bond strength in subgroups, one-away ANOVA was applied. Significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results. Bond strength was significantly higher to composite samples compared to RMGI samples (p<0.001). The difference in bond strength of composite samples between MTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.026) as well as MTA and NAMTA subgroups (P= 0.019) was significant, but the difference between NAMTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.56) was not significant. The differences in bond strength in subgroups of RMGI group were not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion. Regarding shear bond strength to the tested substrates, composite was shown to be superior to RMGI. The bond of resin composite to MTA was weaker than that to CEM and NAMTA. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2013 2013-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3779376/ /pubmed/24082988 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.026 Text en © 2013 The Authors; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ajami, Amir Ahmad
Jafari Navimipour, Elmira
Savadi Oskoee, Siavash
Abed Kahnamoui, Mehdi
Lotfi, Mehrdad
Daneshpooy, Mehdi
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
title Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
title_full Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
title_fullStr Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
title_short Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
title_sort comparison of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin to three pulp capping agents
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082988
http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.026
work_keys_str_mv AT ajamiamirahmad comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents
AT jafarinavimipourelmira comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents
AT savadioskoeesiavash comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents
AT abedkahnamouimehdi comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents
AT lotfimehrdad comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents
AT daneshpooymehdi comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents