Cargando…

Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response?

BACKGROUND: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a widely used treatment for open angle glaucoma, producing sustained reductions of intraocular pressure (IOP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term relationship between SLT energy dosage and IOP reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habib, Larissa, Lin, James, Berezina, Tamara, Holland, Bart, Fechtner, Robert D., Khouri, Albert S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082666
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.116635
_version_ 1782285247161827328
author Habib, Larissa
Lin, James
Berezina, Tamara
Holland, Bart
Fechtner, Robert D.
Khouri, Albert S.
author_facet Habib, Larissa
Lin, James
Berezina, Tamara
Holland, Bart
Fechtner, Robert D.
Khouri, Albert S.
author_sort Habib, Larissa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a widely used treatment for open angle glaucoma, producing sustained reductions of intraocular pressure (IOP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term relationship between SLT energy dosage and IOP reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for patients receiving primary SLT therapy, with inclusion of subjects treated with 360° of SLT. Energy settings were collected upon treatment and IOP was collected at baseline up to 36 months. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine whether there was a significant correlation between SLT energy and IOP reduction at all time points. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was performed to determine the differences in IOP reduction ≥20% from baseline among those treated with low (<85 mJ), medium (85-105 mJ), and high (>105 mJ) energy SLT. RESULTS: A total of 104 eyes (75 patients) were included. The mean total SLT energy was 93.73 mJ (standard deviation (SD) = 21.83 mJ, range: 34.4-122 mJ). A significant positive correlation (P ≤ 0.05) between the amount of energy delivered and IOP reduction was found at all time points. Log-rank test showed a significant difference in IOP reduction ≥20% from baseline between the three energy groups, with low energy patients experiencing failure at an earlier time (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of total energy examined, there is a positive correlation between total energy used and amount of pressure reduction achieved at up to 3 years of follow-up. This may be useful in determining the optimal energy dosage for maximum effect for patients receiving SLT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3779422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37794222013-09-30 Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response? Habib, Larissa Lin, James Berezina, Tamara Holland, Bart Fechtner, Robert D. Khouri, Albert S. Oman J Ophthalmol Original Article BACKGROUND: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a widely used treatment for open angle glaucoma, producing sustained reductions of intraocular pressure (IOP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term relationship between SLT energy dosage and IOP reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for patients receiving primary SLT therapy, with inclusion of subjects treated with 360° of SLT. Energy settings were collected upon treatment and IOP was collected at baseline up to 36 months. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine whether there was a significant correlation between SLT energy and IOP reduction at all time points. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was performed to determine the differences in IOP reduction ≥20% from baseline among those treated with low (<85 mJ), medium (85-105 mJ), and high (>105 mJ) energy SLT. RESULTS: A total of 104 eyes (75 patients) were included. The mean total SLT energy was 93.73 mJ (standard deviation (SD) = 21.83 mJ, range: 34.4-122 mJ). A significant positive correlation (P ≤ 0.05) between the amount of energy delivered and IOP reduction was found at all time points. Log-rank test showed a significant difference in IOP reduction ≥20% from baseline between the three energy groups, with low energy patients experiencing failure at an earlier time (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of total energy examined, there is a positive correlation between total energy used and amount of pressure reduction achieved at up to 3 years of follow-up. This may be useful in determining the optimal energy dosage for maximum effect for patients receiving SLT. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3779422/ /pubmed/24082666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.116635 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Habib L, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Habib, Larissa
Lin, James
Berezina, Tamara
Holland, Bart
Fechtner, Robert D.
Khouri, Albert S.
Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response?
title Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response?
title_full Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response?
title_fullStr Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response?
title_full_unstemmed Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response?
title_short Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response?
title_sort selective laser trabeculoplasty: does energy dosage predict response?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082666
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.116635
work_keys_str_mv AT habiblarissa selectivelasertrabeculoplastydoesenergydosagepredictresponse
AT linjames selectivelasertrabeculoplastydoesenergydosagepredictresponse
AT berezinatamara selectivelasertrabeculoplastydoesenergydosagepredictresponse
AT hollandbart selectivelasertrabeculoplastydoesenergydosagepredictresponse
AT fechtnerrobertd selectivelasertrabeculoplastydoesenergydosagepredictresponse
AT khourialberts selectivelasertrabeculoplastydoesenergydosagepredictresponse