Cargando…
Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response?
BACKGROUND: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a widely used treatment for open angle glaucoma, producing sustained reductions of intraocular pressure (IOP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term relationship between SLT energy dosage and IOP reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.116635 |
_version_ | 1782285247161827328 |
---|---|
author | Habib, Larissa Lin, James Berezina, Tamara Holland, Bart Fechtner, Robert D. Khouri, Albert S. |
author_facet | Habib, Larissa Lin, James Berezina, Tamara Holland, Bart Fechtner, Robert D. Khouri, Albert S. |
author_sort | Habib, Larissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a widely used treatment for open angle glaucoma, producing sustained reductions of intraocular pressure (IOP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term relationship between SLT energy dosage and IOP reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for patients receiving primary SLT therapy, with inclusion of subjects treated with 360° of SLT. Energy settings were collected upon treatment and IOP was collected at baseline up to 36 months. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine whether there was a significant correlation between SLT energy and IOP reduction at all time points. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was performed to determine the differences in IOP reduction ≥20% from baseline among those treated with low (<85 mJ), medium (85-105 mJ), and high (>105 mJ) energy SLT. RESULTS: A total of 104 eyes (75 patients) were included. The mean total SLT energy was 93.73 mJ (standard deviation (SD) = 21.83 mJ, range: 34.4-122 mJ). A significant positive correlation (P ≤ 0.05) between the amount of energy delivered and IOP reduction was found at all time points. Log-rank test showed a significant difference in IOP reduction ≥20% from baseline between the three energy groups, with low energy patients experiencing failure at an earlier time (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of total energy examined, there is a positive correlation between total energy used and amount of pressure reduction achieved at up to 3 years of follow-up. This may be useful in determining the optimal energy dosage for maximum effect for patients receiving SLT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3779422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37794222013-09-30 Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response? Habib, Larissa Lin, James Berezina, Tamara Holland, Bart Fechtner, Robert D. Khouri, Albert S. Oman J Ophthalmol Original Article BACKGROUND: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a widely used treatment for open angle glaucoma, producing sustained reductions of intraocular pressure (IOP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term relationship between SLT energy dosage and IOP reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for patients receiving primary SLT therapy, with inclusion of subjects treated with 360° of SLT. Energy settings were collected upon treatment and IOP was collected at baseline up to 36 months. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine whether there was a significant correlation between SLT energy and IOP reduction at all time points. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was performed to determine the differences in IOP reduction ≥20% from baseline among those treated with low (<85 mJ), medium (85-105 mJ), and high (>105 mJ) energy SLT. RESULTS: A total of 104 eyes (75 patients) were included. The mean total SLT energy was 93.73 mJ (standard deviation (SD) = 21.83 mJ, range: 34.4-122 mJ). A significant positive correlation (P ≤ 0.05) between the amount of energy delivered and IOP reduction was found at all time points. Log-rank test showed a significant difference in IOP reduction ≥20% from baseline between the three energy groups, with low energy patients experiencing failure at an earlier time (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of total energy examined, there is a positive correlation between total energy used and amount of pressure reduction achieved at up to 3 years of follow-up. This may be useful in determining the optimal energy dosage for maximum effect for patients receiving SLT. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3779422/ /pubmed/24082666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.116635 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Habib L, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Habib, Larissa Lin, James Berezina, Tamara Holland, Bart Fechtner, Robert D. Khouri, Albert S. Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response? |
title | Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response? |
title_full | Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response? |
title_fullStr | Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response? |
title_full_unstemmed | Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response? |
title_short | Selective laser trabeculoplasty: Does energy dosage predict response? |
title_sort | selective laser trabeculoplasty: does energy dosage predict response? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24082666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.116635 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT habiblarissa selectivelasertrabeculoplastydoesenergydosagepredictresponse AT linjames selectivelasertrabeculoplastydoesenergydosagepredictresponse AT berezinatamara selectivelasertrabeculoplastydoesenergydosagepredictresponse AT hollandbart selectivelasertrabeculoplastydoesenergydosagepredictresponse AT fechtnerrobertd selectivelasertrabeculoplastydoesenergydosagepredictresponse AT khourialberts selectivelasertrabeculoplastydoesenergydosagepredictresponse |