Cargando…

Cigarette pack design and adolescent smoking susceptibility: a cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVES: To compare adolescents’ responses to three different styles of cigarette packaging: novelty (branded packs designed with a distinctive shape, opening style or bright colour), regular (branded pack with no special design features) and plain (brown pack with a standard shape and opening an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ford, Allison, MacKintosh, Anne Marie, Moodie, Crawford, Richardson, Sol, Hastings, Gerard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24056481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003282
_version_ 1782285288160100352
author Ford, Allison
MacKintosh, Anne Marie
Moodie, Crawford
Richardson, Sol
Hastings, Gerard
author_facet Ford, Allison
MacKintosh, Anne Marie
Moodie, Crawford
Richardson, Sol
Hastings, Gerard
author_sort Ford, Allison
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare adolescents’ responses to three different styles of cigarette packaging: novelty (branded packs designed with a distinctive shape, opening style or bright colour), regular (branded pack with no special design features) and plain (brown pack with a standard shape and opening and all branding removed, aside from brand name). DESIGN: Cross-sectional in-home survey. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Random location quota sample of 1025 never smokers aged 11–16 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Susceptibility to smoking and composite measures of pack appraisal and pack receptivity derived from 11 survey items. RESULTS: Mean responses to the three pack types were negative for all survey items. However, ‘novelty’ packs were rated significantly less negatively than the ‘regular’ pack on most items, and the novelty and regular packs were rated less negatively than the ‘plain’ pack. For the novelty packs, logistic regressions, controlling for factors known to influence youth smoking, showed that susceptibility was associated with positive appraisal and also receptivity. For example, those receptive to the innovative Silk Cut Superslims pack were more than four times as likely to be susceptible to smoking than those not receptive to this pack (AOR=4.42, 95% CI 2.50 to 7.81, p<0.001). For the regular pack, an association was found between positive appraisal and susceptibility but not with receptivity and susceptibility. There was no association with pack appraisal or receptivity for the plain pack. CONCLUSIONS: Pack structure (shape and opening style) and colour are independently associated, not just with appreciation of and receptivity to the pack, but also with susceptibility to smoke. In other words, those who think most highly of novelty cigarette packaging are also the ones who indicate that they are most likely to go on to smoke. Plain packaging, in contrast, was found to directly reduce the appeal of smoking to adolescents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3780301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37803012013-09-30 Cigarette pack design and adolescent smoking susceptibility: a cross-sectional survey Ford, Allison MacKintosh, Anne Marie Moodie, Crawford Richardson, Sol Hastings, Gerard BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco OBJECTIVES: To compare adolescents’ responses to three different styles of cigarette packaging: novelty (branded packs designed with a distinctive shape, opening style or bright colour), regular (branded pack with no special design features) and plain (brown pack with a standard shape and opening and all branding removed, aside from brand name). DESIGN: Cross-sectional in-home survey. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Random location quota sample of 1025 never smokers aged 11–16 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Susceptibility to smoking and composite measures of pack appraisal and pack receptivity derived from 11 survey items. RESULTS: Mean responses to the three pack types were negative for all survey items. However, ‘novelty’ packs were rated significantly less negatively than the ‘regular’ pack on most items, and the novelty and regular packs were rated less negatively than the ‘plain’ pack. For the novelty packs, logistic regressions, controlling for factors known to influence youth smoking, showed that susceptibility was associated with positive appraisal and also receptivity. For example, those receptive to the innovative Silk Cut Superslims pack were more than four times as likely to be susceptible to smoking than those not receptive to this pack (AOR=4.42, 95% CI 2.50 to 7.81, p<0.001). For the regular pack, an association was found between positive appraisal and susceptibility but not with receptivity and susceptibility. There was no association with pack appraisal or receptivity for the plain pack. CONCLUSIONS: Pack structure (shape and opening style) and colour are independently associated, not just with appreciation of and receptivity to the pack, but also with susceptibility to smoke. In other words, those who think most highly of novelty cigarette packaging are also the ones who indicate that they are most likely to go on to smoke. Plain packaging, in contrast, was found to directly reduce the appeal of smoking to adolescents. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3780301/ /pubmed/24056481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003282 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Smoking and Tobacco
Ford, Allison
MacKintosh, Anne Marie
Moodie, Crawford
Richardson, Sol
Hastings, Gerard
Cigarette pack design and adolescent smoking susceptibility: a cross-sectional survey
title Cigarette pack design and adolescent smoking susceptibility: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Cigarette pack design and adolescent smoking susceptibility: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Cigarette pack design and adolescent smoking susceptibility: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Cigarette pack design and adolescent smoking susceptibility: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Cigarette pack design and adolescent smoking susceptibility: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort cigarette pack design and adolescent smoking susceptibility: a cross-sectional survey
topic Smoking and Tobacco
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24056481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003282
work_keys_str_mv AT fordallison cigarettepackdesignandadolescentsmokingsusceptibilityacrosssectionalsurvey
AT mackintoshannemarie cigarettepackdesignandadolescentsmokingsusceptibilityacrosssectionalsurvey
AT moodiecrawford cigarettepackdesignandadolescentsmokingsusceptibilityacrosssectionalsurvey
AT richardsonsol cigarettepackdesignandadolescentsmokingsusceptibilityacrosssectionalsurvey
AT hastingsgerard cigarettepackdesignandadolescentsmokingsusceptibilityacrosssectionalsurvey