Cargando…
Internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation
OBJECTIVES: For the last decade a host of different projects have been launched to allow persons who are concerned about their hearing status to quickly and at a low cost test their hearing ability. Most often, this is carried out without collecting complementary information that could be correlated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24041846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003223 |
_version_ | 1782285291647664128 |
---|---|
author | Molander, Peter Nordqvist, Peter Öberg, Marie Lunner, Thomas Lyxell, Björn Andersson, Gerhard |
author_facet | Molander, Peter Nordqvist, Peter Öberg, Marie Lunner, Thomas Lyxell, Björn Andersson, Gerhard |
author_sort | Molander, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: For the last decade a host of different projects have been launched to allow persons who are concerned about their hearing status to quickly and at a low cost test their hearing ability. Most often, this is carried out without collecting complementary information that could be correlated with hearing impairment. In this two-part study we first, present the development and validation of a novel Internet-based hearing test, and second, report on the associations between this test and phonological representation, quality of life and self-reported hearing difficulties. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: An opportunity sample of participants was recruited at the Stockholm central station for the first study. All parts of the second study were conducted via the Internet, with testing and self-report forms adapted for online use. PARTICIPANTS: The first part of the study was carried out in direct contact with the participants, and participants from the second study were recruited by means of advertisements in newspapers and on webpages. The only exclusion criterion was that participants had to be over 18 years old. Most participants were between 60 and 69 years old. There were almost an equal number of men and women (total n=316). OUTCOME MEASURES: 48 participants failed the Internet-based hearing screening test. The group failing the test reported more problems on the Amsterdam Inventory of Auditory Disability. In addition, they were found to have diminished phonological representational skills. However, no difference in quality of life was found. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one in five participants was in need of contacting their local hearing clinic. This group had more complaints regarding tinnitus and hyperacusis, rated their own hearing as worse than those who passed, and had a poorer capability of generating accurate phonological representations. This study suggests that it is feasible to screen for hearing status online, and obtain valid data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3780321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37803212013-09-30 Internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation Molander, Peter Nordqvist, Peter Öberg, Marie Lunner, Thomas Lyxell, Björn Andersson, Gerhard BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology OBJECTIVES: For the last decade a host of different projects have been launched to allow persons who are concerned about their hearing status to quickly and at a low cost test their hearing ability. Most often, this is carried out without collecting complementary information that could be correlated with hearing impairment. In this two-part study we first, present the development and validation of a novel Internet-based hearing test, and second, report on the associations between this test and phonological representation, quality of life and self-reported hearing difficulties. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: An opportunity sample of participants was recruited at the Stockholm central station for the first study. All parts of the second study were conducted via the Internet, with testing and self-report forms adapted for online use. PARTICIPANTS: The first part of the study was carried out in direct contact with the participants, and participants from the second study were recruited by means of advertisements in newspapers and on webpages. The only exclusion criterion was that participants had to be over 18 years old. Most participants were between 60 and 69 years old. There were almost an equal number of men and women (total n=316). OUTCOME MEASURES: 48 participants failed the Internet-based hearing screening test. The group failing the test reported more problems on the Amsterdam Inventory of Auditory Disability. In addition, they were found to have diminished phonological representational skills. However, no difference in quality of life was found. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one in five participants was in need of contacting their local hearing clinic. This group had more complaints regarding tinnitus and hyperacusis, rated their own hearing as worse than those who passed, and had a poorer capability of generating accurate phonological representations. This study suggests that it is feasible to screen for hearing status online, and obtain valid data. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3780321/ /pubmed/24041846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003223 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology Molander, Peter Nordqvist, Peter Öberg, Marie Lunner, Thomas Lyxell, Björn Andersson, Gerhard Internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation |
title | Internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation |
title_full | Internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation |
title_fullStr | Internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation |
title_full_unstemmed | Internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation |
title_short | Internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation |
title_sort | internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation |
topic | Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24041846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molanderpeter internetbasedhearingscreeningusingspeechinnoisevalidationandcomparisonsofselfreportedhearingproblemsqualityoflifeandphonologicalrepresentation AT nordqvistpeter internetbasedhearingscreeningusingspeechinnoisevalidationandcomparisonsofselfreportedhearingproblemsqualityoflifeandphonologicalrepresentation AT obergmarie internetbasedhearingscreeningusingspeechinnoisevalidationandcomparisonsofselfreportedhearingproblemsqualityoflifeandphonologicalrepresentation AT lunnerthomas internetbasedhearingscreeningusingspeechinnoisevalidationandcomparisonsofselfreportedhearingproblemsqualityoflifeandphonologicalrepresentation AT lyxellbjorn internetbasedhearingscreeningusingspeechinnoisevalidationandcomparisonsofselfreportedhearingproblemsqualityoflifeandphonologicalrepresentation AT anderssongerhard internetbasedhearingscreeningusingspeechinnoisevalidationandcomparisonsofselfreportedhearingproblemsqualityoflifeandphonologicalrepresentation |