Cargando…

The COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study: protocol for a Dutch cohort study on poststroke subjective cognitive complaints

BACKGROUND: Although many studies have assessed poststroke objective cognitive impairment, only a few have evaluated patients’ subjective cognitive complaints (SCC). Although these SCC are found to be common in the early and chronic phases after stroke, knowledge about their risk factors, course ove...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Rijsbergen, Marielle W A, Mark, Ruth E, de Kort, Paul L M, Sitskoorn, Margriet M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24056490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003599
_version_ 1782285294817509376
author van Rijsbergen, Marielle W A
Mark, Ruth E
de Kort, Paul L M
Sitskoorn, Margriet M
author_facet van Rijsbergen, Marielle W A
Mark, Ruth E
de Kort, Paul L M
Sitskoorn, Margriet M
author_sort van Rijsbergen, Marielle W A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although many studies have assessed poststroke objective cognitive impairment, only a few have evaluated patients’ subjective cognitive complaints (SCC). Although these SCC are found to be common in the early and chronic phases after stroke, knowledge about their risk factors, course over time, differences with healthy controls and their diagnostic relevance is limited. The aim of the COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study is therefore to determine the possible risk factors, prognosis, time course and predictive value of SCC in the first 2 years after stroke. METHODS AND DESIGN: A prospective cohort study is conducted in which patients are compared to non-stroke controls at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after stroke. Approximately 300 patients are recruited from the stroke units of three hospitals in the Netherlands, while 300 controls are sought among the relatives (spouses excluded) and social networks of participants. A wide range of subjective and objective variables is assessed in both groups using interviews, questionnaires and neuropsychological assessment. The primary outcomes include SCC and objective cognitive impairment, whereas secondary outcomes are quality of life, subjective recovery and daily life functioning. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is being carried out in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act. The protocol has been approved by the medical ethics committees of the participating centres and all participants give written informed consent. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to the medical society and general public. DISCUSSION: The COMPAS study is the first to systematically evaluate poststroke SCC in a prospective longitudinal design, taking a wide range of subjective and objective variables into account. The results obtained can be used to accurately inform patients and their families, as well as to develop patient-tailored intervention programmes to ultimately improve stroke patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3780338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37803382013-09-30 The COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study: protocol for a Dutch cohort study on poststroke subjective cognitive complaints van Rijsbergen, Marielle W A Mark, Ruth E de Kort, Paul L M Sitskoorn, Margriet M BMJ Open Neurology BACKGROUND: Although many studies have assessed poststroke objective cognitive impairment, only a few have evaluated patients’ subjective cognitive complaints (SCC). Although these SCC are found to be common in the early and chronic phases after stroke, knowledge about their risk factors, course over time, differences with healthy controls and their diagnostic relevance is limited. The aim of the COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study is therefore to determine the possible risk factors, prognosis, time course and predictive value of SCC in the first 2 years after stroke. METHODS AND DESIGN: A prospective cohort study is conducted in which patients are compared to non-stroke controls at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after stroke. Approximately 300 patients are recruited from the stroke units of three hospitals in the Netherlands, while 300 controls are sought among the relatives (spouses excluded) and social networks of participants. A wide range of subjective and objective variables is assessed in both groups using interviews, questionnaires and neuropsychological assessment. The primary outcomes include SCC and objective cognitive impairment, whereas secondary outcomes are quality of life, subjective recovery and daily life functioning. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is being carried out in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act. The protocol has been approved by the medical ethics committees of the participating centres and all participants give written informed consent. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to the medical society and general public. DISCUSSION: The COMPAS study is the first to systematically evaluate poststroke SCC in a prospective longitudinal design, taking a wide range of subjective and objective variables into account. The results obtained can be used to accurately inform patients and their families, as well as to develop patient-tailored intervention programmes to ultimately improve stroke patient care. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3780338/ /pubmed/24056490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003599 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Neurology
van Rijsbergen, Marielle W A
Mark, Ruth E
de Kort, Paul L M
Sitskoorn, Margriet M
The COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study: protocol for a Dutch cohort study on poststroke subjective cognitive complaints
title The COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study: protocol for a Dutch cohort study on poststroke subjective cognitive complaints
title_full The COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study: protocol for a Dutch cohort study on poststroke subjective cognitive complaints
title_fullStr The COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study: protocol for a Dutch cohort study on poststroke subjective cognitive complaints
title_full_unstemmed The COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study: protocol for a Dutch cohort study on poststroke subjective cognitive complaints
title_short The COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study: protocol for a Dutch cohort study on poststroke subjective cognitive complaints
title_sort complaints after stroke (compas) study: protocol for a dutch cohort study on poststroke subjective cognitive complaints
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24056490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003599
work_keys_str_mv AT vanrijsbergenmariellewa thecomplaintsafterstrokecompasstudyprotocolforadutchcohortstudyonpoststrokesubjectivecognitivecomplaints
AT markruthe thecomplaintsafterstrokecompasstudyprotocolforadutchcohortstudyonpoststrokesubjectivecognitivecomplaints
AT dekortpaullm thecomplaintsafterstrokecompasstudyprotocolforadutchcohortstudyonpoststrokesubjectivecognitivecomplaints
AT sitskoornmargrietm thecomplaintsafterstrokecompasstudyprotocolforadutchcohortstudyonpoststrokesubjectivecognitivecomplaints
AT vanrijsbergenmariellewa complaintsafterstrokecompasstudyprotocolforadutchcohortstudyonpoststrokesubjectivecognitivecomplaints
AT markruthe complaintsafterstrokecompasstudyprotocolforadutchcohortstudyonpoststrokesubjectivecognitivecomplaints
AT dekortpaullm complaintsafterstrokecompasstudyprotocolforadutchcohortstudyonpoststrokesubjectivecognitivecomplaints
AT sitskoornmargrietm complaintsafterstrokecompasstudyprotocolforadutchcohortstudyonpoststrokesubjectivecognitivecomplaints