Cargando…

Use of a generic protocol in documentation of prescription errors in Estonia, Norway and Sweden

Pharmacists have an important role in detecting, preventing, and solving prescription problems, which if left unresolved, may pose a risk of harming the patient. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of a generic study instrument for documentation of prescription p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volmer, Daisy, Haavik, Svein, Ekedahl, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24155820
_version_ 1782285302042198016
author Volmer, Daisy
Haavik, Svein
Ekedahl, Anders
author_facet Volmer, Daisy
Haavik, Svein
Ekedahl, Anders
author_sort Volmer, Daisy
collection PubMed
description Pharmacists have an important role in detecting, preventing, and solving prescription problems, which if left unresolved, may pose a risk of harming the patient. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of a generic study instrument for documentation of prescription problems requiring contact with prescriber before dispensing. The study was organized: 1) by countries: Estonia, Norway and Sweden; 2) by type of prescriptions: handwritten prescriptions, printouts of prescriptions in the electronic medical record and electronically transmitted prescriptions to pharmacies; and 3) by recording method - self-completion by pharmacists and independent observers. METHODS: Observational study with independent observers at community pharmacies in Estonia (n=4) and Sweden (n=7) and self-completed protocols in Norway (n=9). RESULTS: Pharmacists’'in Estonia contacted the prescriber for 1.47% of the prescriptions, about 3 times as often as in Norway (0.45%) and Sweden (0.38%). Handwritten prescriptions dominated among the problem prescriptions in Estonia (73.2%), printouts of prescriptions in the electronic medical record (89.1%) in Norway and electronically transmitted prescriptions to pharmacies (55.9%) in Sweden. More administrative errors were identified on handwritten prescriptions and printouts of prescriptions in the electronic medical record in Estonia and in Norway compared with electronically transmitted prescriptions to pharmacies in Sweden (p<0.05 for prescription types and p<0.01 for countries). However, clinically important errors and delivery problems appeared equally often on the different types of prescriptions. In all three countries, only few cases of drug interactions and adverse drug reactions were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the different patterns of prescription problems in three countries, the instrument was feasible and can be regarded appropriate to document and classify prescription problems necessitating contact with prescriber before dispensing, irrespective of the type of prescription or recording method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3780480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37804802013-10-23 Use of a generic protocol in documentation of prescription errors in Estonia, Norway and Sweden Volmer, Daisy Haavik, Svein Ekedahl, Anders Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research Pharmacists have an important role in detecting, preventing, and solving prescription problems, which if left unresolved, may pose a risk of harming the patient. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of a generic study instrument for documentation of prescription problems requiring contact with prescriber before dispensing. The study was organized: 1) by countries: Estonia, Norway and Sweden; 2) by type of prescriptions: handwritten prescriptions, printouts of prescriptions in the electronic medical record and electronically transmitted prescriptions to pharmacies; and 3) by recording method - self-completion by pharmacists and independent observers. METHODS: Observational study with independent observers at community pharmacies in Estonia (n=4) and Sweden (n=7) and self-completed protocols in Norway (n=9). RESULTS: Pharmacists’'in Estonia contacted the prescriber for 1.47% of the prescriptions, about 3 times as often as in Norway (0.45%) and Sweden (0.38%). Handwritten prescriptions dominated among the problem prescriptions in Estonia (73.2%), printouts of prescriptions in the electronic medical record (89.1%) in Norway and electronically transmitted prescriptions to pharmacies (55.9%) in Sweden. More administrative errors were identified on handwritten prescriptions and printouts of prescriptions in the electronic medical record in Estonia and in Norway compared with electronically transmitted prescriptions to pharmacies in Sweden (p<0.05 for prescription types and p<0.01 for countries). However, clinically important errors and delivery problems appeared equally often on the different types of prescriptions. In all three countries, only few cases of drug interactions and adverse drug reactions were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the different patterns of prescription problems in three countries, the instrument was feasible and can be regarded appropriate to document and classify prescription problems necessitating contact with prescriber before dispensing, irrespective of the type of prescription or recording method. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2012 2012-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3780480/ /pubmed/24155820 Text en Copyright © 2012, CIPF http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Volmer, Daisy
Haavik, Svein
Ekedahl, Anders
Use of a generic protocol in documentation of prescription errors in Estonia, Norway and Sweden
title Use of a generic protocol in documentation of prescription errors in Estonia, Norway and Sweden
title_full Use of a generic protocol in documentation of prescription errors in Estonia, Norway and Sweden
title_fullStr Use of a generic protocol in documentation of prescription errors in Estonia, Norway and Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Use of a generic protocol in documentation of prescription errors in Estonia, Norway and Sweden
title_short Use of a generic protocol in documentation of prescription errors in Estonia, Norway and Sweden
title_sort use of a generic protocol in documentation of prescription errors in estonia, norway and sweden
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24155820
work_keys_str_mv AT volmerdaisy useofagenericprotocolindocumentationofprescriptionerrorsinestonianorwayandsweden
AT haaviksvein useofagenericprotocolindocumentationofprescriptionerrorsinestonianorwayandsweden
AT ekedahlanders useofagenericprotocolindocumentationofprescriptionerrorsinestonianorwayandsweden