Cargando…

The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain

Clostridium difficile is a major cause of healthcare-associated infection and inflicts a considerable financial burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Disease symptoms range from self-limiting diarrhoea to fatal pseudomembranous colitis. Whilst C. difficile has two major virulence factors, toxin A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baban, Soza T., Kuehne, Sarah A., Barketi-Klai, Amira, Cartman, Stephen T., Kelly, Michelle L., Hardie, Kim R., Kansau, Imad, Collignon, Anne, Minton, Nigel P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24086268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073026
_version_ 1782285370406207488
author Baban, Soza T.
Kuehne, Sarah A.
Barketi-Klai, Amira
Cartman, Stephen T.
Kelly, Michelle L.
Hardie, Kim R.
Kansau, Imad
Collignon, Anne
Minton, Nigel P.
author_facet Baban, Soza T.
Kuehne, Sarah A.
Barketi-Klai, Amira
Cartman, Stephen T.
Kelly, Michelle L.
Hardie, Kim R.
Kansau, Imad
Collignon, Anne
Minton, Nigel P.
author_sort Baban, Soza T.
collection PubMed
description Clostridium difficile is a major cause of healthcare-associated infection and inflicts a considerable financial burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Disease symptoms range from self-limiting diarrhoea to fatal pseudomembranous colitis. Whilst C. difficile has two major virulence factors, toxin A and B, it is generally accepted that other virulence components of the bacterium contribute to disease. C. difficile colonises the gut of humans and animals and hence the processes of adherence and colonisation are essential for disease onset. Previously it has been suggested that flagella might be implicated in colonisation. Here we tested this hypothesis by comparing flagellated parental strains to strains in which flagella genes were inactivated using ClosTron technology. Our focus was on a UK-outbreak, PCR-ribotype 027 (B1/NAP1) strain, R20291. We compared the flagellated wild-type to a mutant with a paralyzed flagellum and also to mutants (fliC, fliD and flgE) that no longer produce flagella in vitro and in vivo. Our results with R20291 provide the first strong evidence that by disabling the motor of the flagellum, the structural components of the flagellum rather than active motility, is needed for adherence and colonisation of the intestinal epithelium during infection. Comparison to published data on 630Δerm and our own data on that strain revealed major differences between the strains: the R20291 flagellar mutants adhered less than the parental strain in vitro, whereas we saw the opposite in 630Δerm. We also showed that flagella and motility are not needed for successful colonisation in vivo using strain 630Δerm. Finally we demonstrated that in strain R20291, flagella do play a role in colonisation and adherence and that there are striking differences between C. difficile strains. The latter emphasises the overriding need to characterize more than just one strain before drawing general conclusions concerning specific mechanisms of pathogenesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3781105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37811052013-10-01 The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain Baban, Soza T. Kuehne, Sarah A. Barketi-Klai, Amira Cartman, Stephen T. Kelly, Michelle L. Hardie, Kim R. Kansau, Imad Collignon, Anne Minton, Nigel P. PLoS One Research Article Clostridium difficile is a major cause of healthcare-associated infection and inflicts a considerable financial burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Disease symptoms range from self-limiting diarrhoea to fatal pseudomembranous colitis. Whilst C. difficile has two major virulence factors, toxin A and B, it is generally accepted that other virulence components of the bacterium contribute to disease. C. difficile colonises the gut of humans and animals and hence the processes of adherence and colonisation are essential for disease onset. Previously it has been suggested that flagella might be implicated in colonisation. Here we tested this hypothesis by comparing flagellated parental strains to strains in which flagella genes were inactivated using ClosTron technology. Our focus was on a UK-outbreak, PCR-ribotype 027 (B1/NAP1) strain, R20291. We compared the flagellated wild-type to a mutant with a paralyzed flagellum and also to mutants (fliC, fliD and flgE) that no longer produce flagella in vitro and in vivo. Our results with R20291 provide the first strong evidence that by disabling the motor of the flagellum, the structural components of the flagellum rather than active motility, is needed for adherence and colonisation of the intestinal epithelium during infection. Comparison to published data on 630Δerm and our own data on that strain revealed major differences between the strains: the R20291 flagellar mutants adhered less than the parental strain in vitro, whereas we saw the opposite in 630Δerm. We also showed that flagella and motility are not needed for successful colonisation in vivo using strain 630Δerm. Finally we demonstrated that in strain R20291, flagella do play a role in colonisation and adherence and that there are striking differences between C. difficile strains. The latter emphasises the overriding need to characterize more than just one strain before drawing general conclusions concerning specific mechanisms of pathogenesis. Public Library of Science 2013-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3781105/ /pubmed/24086268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073026 Text en © 2013 Baban et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baban, Soza T.
Kuehne, Sarah A.
Barketi-Klai, Amira
Cartman, Stephen T.
Kelly, Michelle L.
Hardie, Kim R.
Kansau, Imad
Collignon, Anne
Minton, Nigel P.
The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain
title The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain
title_full The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain
title_fullStr The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain
title_short The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain
title_sort role of flagella in clostridium difficile pathogenesis: comparison between a non-epidemic and an epidemic strain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24086268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073026
work_keys_str_mv AT babansozat theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT kuehnesaraha theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT barketiklaiamira theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT cartmanstephent theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT kellymichellel theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT hardiekimr theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT kansauimad theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT collignonanne theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT mintonnigelp theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT babansozat roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT kuehnesaraha roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT barketiklaiamira roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT cartmanstephent roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT kellymichellel roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT hardiekimr roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT kansauimad roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT collignonanne roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain
AT mintonnigelp roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain