Cargando…
The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain
Clostridium difficile is a major cause of healthcare-associated infection and inflicts a considerable financial burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Disease symptoms range from self-limiting diarrhoea to fatal pseudomembranous colitis. Whilst C. difficile has two major virulence factors, toxin A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24086268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073026 |
_version_ | 1782285370406207488 |
---|---|
author | Baban, Soza T. Kuehne, Sarah A. Barketi-Klai, Amira Cartman, Stephen T. Kelly, Michelle L. Hardie, Kim R. Kansau, Imad Collignon, Anne Minton, Nigel P. |
author_facet | Baban, Soza T. Kuehne, Sarah A. Barketi-Klai, Amira Cartman, Stephen T. Kelly, Michelle L. Hardie, Kim R. Kansau, Imad Collignon, Anne Minton, Nigel P. |
author_sort | Baban, Soza T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clostridium difficile is a major cause of healthcare-associated infection and inflicts a considerable financial burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Disease symptoms range from self-limiting diarrhoea to fatal pseudomembranous colitis. Whilst C. difficile has two major virulence factors, toxin A and B, it is generally accepted that other virulence components of the bacterium contribute to disease. C. difficile colonises the gut of humans and animals and hence the processes of adherence and colonisation are essential for disease onset. Previously it has been suggested that flagella might be implicated in colonisation. Here we tested this hypothesis by comparing flagellated parental strains to strains in which flagella genes were inactivated using ClosTron technology. Our focus was on a UK-outbreak, PCR-ribotype 027 (B1/NAP1) strain, R20291. We compared the flagellated wild-type to a mutant with a paralyzed flagellum and also to mutants (fliC, fliD and flgE) that no longer produce flagella in vitro and in vivo. Our results with R20291 provide the first strong evidence that by disabling the motor of the flagellum, the structural components of the flagellum rather than active motility, is needed for adherence and colonisation of the intestinal epithelium during infection. Comparison to published data on 630Δerm and our own data on that strain revealed major differences between the strains: the R20291 flagellar mutants adhered less than the parental strain in vitro, whereas we saw the opposite in 630Δerm. We also showed that flagella and motility are not needed for successful colonisation in vivo using strain 630Δerm. Finally we demonstrated that in strain R20291, flagella do play a role in colonisation and adherence and that there are striking differences between C. difficile strains. The latter emphasises the overriding need to characterize more than just one strain before drawing general conclusions concerning specific mechanisms of pathogenesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3781105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37811052013-10-01 The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain Baban, Soza T. Kuehne, Sarah A. Barketi-Klai, Amira Cartman, Stephen T. Kelly, Michelle L. Hardie, Kim R. Kansau, Imad Collignon, Anne Minton, Nigel P. PLoS One Research Article Clostridium difficile is a major cause of healthcare-associated infection and inflicts a considerable financial burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Disease symptoms range from self-limiting diarrhoea to fatal pseudomembranous colitis. Whilst C. difficile has two major virulence factors, toxin A and B, it is generally accepted that other virulence components of the bacterium contribute to disease. C. difficile colonises the gut of humans and animals and hence the processes of adherence and colonisation are essential for disease onset. Previously it has been suggested that flagella might be implicated in colonisation. Here we tested this hypothesis by comparing flagellated parental strains to strains in which flagella genes were inactivated using ClosTron technology. Our focus was on a UK-outbreak, PCR-ribotype 027 (B1/NAP1) strain, R20291. We compared the flagellated wild-type to a mutant with a paralyzed flagellum and also to mutants (fliC, fliD and flgE) that no longer produce flagella in vitro and in vivo. Our results with R20291 provide the first strong evidence that by disabling the motor of the flagellum, the structural components of the flagellum rather than active motility, is needed for adherence and colonisation of the intestinal epithelium during infection. Comparison to published data on 630Δerm and our own data on that strain revealed major differences between the strains: the R20291 flagellar mutants adhered less than the parental strain in vitro, whereas we saw the opposite in 630Δerm. We also showed that flagella and motility are not needed for successful colonisation in vivo using strain 630Δerm. Finally we demonstrated that in strain R20291, flagella do play a role in colonisation and adherence and that there are striking differences between C. difficile strains. The latter emphasises the overriding need to characterize more than just one strain before drawing general conclusions concerning specific mechanisms of pathogenesis. Public Library of Science 2013-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3781105/ /pubmed/24086268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073026 Text en © 2013 Baban et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Baban, Soza T. Kuehne, Sarah A. Barketi-Klai, Amira Cartman, Stephen T. Kelly, Michelle L. Hardie, Kim R. Kansau, Imad Collignon, Anne Minton, Nigel P. The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain |
title | The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain |
title_full | The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain |
title_fullStr | The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain |
title_short | The Role of Flagella in Clostridium difficile Pathogenesis: Comparison between a Non-Epidemic and an Epidemic Strain |
title_sort | role of flagella in clostridium difficile pathogenesis: comparison between a non-epidemic and an epidemic strain |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24086268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT babansozat theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT kuehnesaraha theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT barketiklaiamira theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT cartmanstephent theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT kellymichellel theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT hardiekimr theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT kansauimad theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT collignonanne theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT mintonnigelp theroleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT babansozat roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT kuehnesaraha roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT barketiklaiamira roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT cartmanstephent roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT kellymichellel roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT hardiekimr roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT kansauimad roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT collignonanne roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain AT mintonnigelp roleofflagellainclostridiumdifficilepathogenesiscomparisonbetweenanonepidemicandanepidemicstrain |