Cargando…
Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide
OBJECTIVES: Review available guidance for quality assurance (QA) in mammography and discuss its contribution to harmonise practices worldwide. METHODS: Literature search was performed on different sources to identify guidance documents for QA in mammography available worldwide in international bodie...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23912879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0269-1 |
_version_ | 1782285393748557824 |
---|---|
author | Reis, Cláudia Pascoal, Ana Sakellaris, Taxiarchis Koutalonis, Manthos |
author_facet | Reis, Cláudia Pascoal, Ana Sakellaris, Taxiarchis Koutalonis, Manthos |
author_sort | Reis, Cláudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Review available guidance for quality assurance (QA) in mammography and discuss its contribution to harmonise practices worldwide. METHODS: Literature search was performed on different sources to identify guidance documents for QA in mammography available worldwide in international bodies, healthcare providers, professional/scientific associations. The guidance documents identified were reviewed and a selection was compared for type of guidance (clinical/technical), technology and proposed QA methodologies focusing on dose and image quality (IQ) performance assessment. RESULTS: Fourteen protocols (targeted at conventional and digital mammography) were reviewed. All included recommendations for testing acquisition, processing and display systems associated with mammographic equipment. All guidance reviewed highlighted the importance of dose assessment and testing the Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) system. Recommended tests for assessment of IQ showed variations in the proposed methodologies. Recommended testing focused on assessment of low-contrast detection, spatial resolution and noise. QC of image display is recommended following the American Association of Physicists in Medicine guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The existing QA guidance for mammography is derived from key documents (American College of Radiology and European Union guidelines) and proposes similar tests despite the variations in detail and methodologies. Studies reported on QA data should provide detail on experimental technique to allow robust data comparison. Countries aiming to implement a mammography/QA program may select/prioritise the tests depending on available technology and resources. MAIN MESSAGES: •An effective QA program should be practical to implement in a clinical setting. •QA should address the various stages of the imaging chain: acquisition, processing and display. •AEC system QC testing is simple to implement and provides information on equipment performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3781250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37812502013-09-25 Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide Reis, Cláudia Pascoal, Ana Sakellaris, Taxiarchis Koutalonis, Manthos Insights Imaging Review OBJECTIVES: Review available guidance for quality assurance (QA) in mammography and discuss its contribution to harmonise practices worldwide. METHODS: Literature search was performed on different sources to identify guidance documents for QA in mammography available worldwide in international bodies, healthcare providers, professional/scientific associations. The guidance documents identified were reviewed and a selection was compared for type of guidance (clinical/technical), technology and proposed QA methodologies focusing on dose and image quality (IQ) performance assessment. RESULTS: Fourteen protocols (targeted at conventional and digital mammography) were reviewed. All included recommendations for testing acquisition, processing and display systems associated with mammographic equipment. All guidance reviewed highlighted the importance of dose assessment and testing the Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) system. Recommended tests for assessment of IQ showed variations in the proposed methodologies. Recommended testing focused on assessment of low-contrast detection, spatial resolution and noise. QC of image display is recommended following the American Association of Physicists in Medicine guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The existing QA guidance for mammography is derived from key documents (American College of Radiology and European Union guidelines) and proposes similar tests despite the variations in detail and methodologies. Studies reported on QA data should provide detail on experimental technique to allow robust data comparison. Countries aiming to implement a mammography/QA program may select/prioritise the tests depending on available technology and resources. MAIN MESSAGES: •An effective QA program should be practical to implement in a clinical setting. •QA should address the various stages of the imaging chain: acquisition, processing and display. •AEC system QC testing is simple to implement and provides information on equipment performance. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3781250/ /pubmed/23912879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0269-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Reis, Cláudia Pascoal, Ana Sakellaris, Taxiarchis Koutalonis, Manthos Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide |
title | Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide |
title_full | Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide |
title_fullStr | Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide |
title_short | Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide |
title_sort | quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23912879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0269-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reisclaudia qualityassuranceandqualitycontrolinmammographyareviewofavailableguidanceworldwide AT pascoalana qualityassuranceandqualitycontrolinmammographyareviewofavailableguidanceworldwide AT sakellaristaxiarchis qualityassuranceandqualitycontrolinmammographyareviewofavailableguidanceworldwide AT koutalonismanthos qualityassuranceandqualitycontrolinmammographyareviewofavailableguidanceworldwide |