Cargando…

Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation?

This study examines spontaneous phonetic accommodation of a dialect with distinct categories by speakers who are in the process of merging those categories. We focus on the merger of the NEAR and SQUARE lexical sets in New Zealand English, presenting New Zealand participants with an unmerged speaker...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babel, Molly, McAuliffe, Michael, Haber, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069011
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00653
_version_ 1782285409819033600
author Babel, Molly
McAuliffe, Michael
Haber, Graham
author_facet Babel, Molly
McAuliffe, Michael
Haber, Graham
author_sort Babel, Molly
collection PubMed
description This study examines spontaneous phonetic accommodation of a dialect with distinct categories by speakers who are in the process of merging those categories. We focus on the merger of the NEAR and SQUARE lexical sets in New Zealand English, presenting New Zealand participants with an unmerged speaker of Australian English. Mergers-in-progress are a uniquely interesting sound change as they showcase the asymmetry between speech perception and production. Yet, we examine mergers using spontaneous phonetic imitation, which is phenomenon that is necessarily a behavior where perceptual input influences speech production. Phonetic imitation is quantified by a perceptual measure and an acoustic calculation of mergedness using a Pillai-Bartlett trace. The results from both analyses indicate spontaneous phonetic imitation is moderated by extra-linguistic factors such as the valence of assigned conditions and social bias. We also find evidence for a decrease in the degree of mergedness in post-exposure productions. Taken together, our results suggest that under the appropriate conditions New Zealanders phonetically accommodate to Australian English and that in the process of speech imitation, mergers-in-progress can, but do not consistently, become less merged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3781342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37813422013-09-25 Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation? Babel, Molly McAuliffe, Michael Haber, Graham Front Psychol Psychology This study examines spontaneous phonetic accommodation of a dialect with distinct categories by speakers who are in the process of merging those categories. We focus on the merger of the NEAR and SQUARE lexical sets in New Zealand English, presenting New Zealand participants with an unmerged speaker of Australian English. Mergers-in-progress are a uniquely interesting sound change as they showcase the asymmetry between speech perception and production. Yet, we examine mergers using spontaneous phonetic imitation, which is phenomenon that is necessarily a behavior where perceptual input influences speech production. Phonetic imitation is quantified by a perceptual measure and an acoustic calculation of mergedness using a Pillai-Bartlett trace. The results from both analyses indicate spontaneous phonetic imitation is moderated by extra-linguistic factors such as the valence of assigned conditions and social bias. We also find evidence for a decrease in the degree of mergedness in post-exposure productions. Taken together, our results suggest that under the appropriate conditions New Zealanders phonetically accommodate to Australian English and that in the process of speech imitation, mergers-in-progress can, but do not consistently, become less merged. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3781342/ /pubmed/24069011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00653 Text en Copyright © 2013 Babel, McAuliffe and Haber. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Babel, Molly
McAuliffe, Michael
Haber, Graham
Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation?
title Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation?
title_full Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation?
title_fullStr Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation?
title_full_unstemmed Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation?
title_short Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation?
title_sort can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069011
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00653
work_keys_str_mv AT babelmolly canmergersinprogressbeunmergedinspeechaccommodation
AT mcauliffemichael canmergersinprogressbeunmergedinspeechaccommodation
AT habergraham canmergersinprogressbeunmergedinspeechaccommodation