Cargando…
Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation?
This study examines spontaneous phonetic accommodation of a dialect with distinct categories by speakers who are in the process of merging those categories. We focus on the merger of the NEAR and SQUARE lexical sets in New Zealand English, presenting New Zealand participants with an unmerged speaker...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00653 |
_version_ | 1782285409819033600 |
---|---|
author | Babel, Molly McAuliffe, Michael Haber, Graham |
author_facet | Babel, Molly McAuliffe, Michael Haber, Graham |
author_sort | Babel, Molly |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study examines spontaneous phonetic accommodation of a dialect with distinct categories by speakers who are in the process of merging those categories. We focus on the merger of the NEAR and SQUARE lexical sets in New Zealand English, presenting New Zealand participants with an unmerged speaker of Australian English. Mergers-in-progress are a uniquely interesting sound change as they showcase the asymmetry between speech perception and production. Yet, we examine mergers using spontaneous phonetic imitation, which is phenomenon that is necessarily a behavior where perceptual input influences speech production. Phonetic imitation is quantified by a perceptual measure and an acoustic calculation of mergedness using a Pillai-Bartlett trace. The results from both analyses indicate spontaneous phonetic imitation is moderated by extra-linguistic factors such as the valence of assigned conditions and social bias. We also find evidence for a decrease in the degree of mergedness in post-exposure productions. Taken together, our results suggest that under the appropriate conditions New Zealanders phonetically accommodate to Australian English and that in the process of speech imitation, mergers-in-progress can, but do not consistently, become less merged. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3781342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37813422013-09-25 Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation? Babel, Molly McAuliffe, Michael Haber, Graham Front Psychol Psychology This study examines spontaneous phonetic accommodation of a dialect with distinct categories by speakers who are in the process of merging those categories. We focus on the merger of the NEAR and SQUARE lexical sets in New Zealand English, presenting New Zealand participants with an unmerged speaker of Australian English. Mergers-in-progress are a uniquely interesting sound change as they showcase the asymmetry between speech perception and production. Yet, we examine mergers using spontaneous phonetic imitation, which is phenomenon that is necessarily a behavior where perceptual input influences speech production. Phonetic imitation is quantified by a perceptual measure and an acoustic calculation of mergedness using a Pillai-Bartlett trace. The results from both analyses indicate spontaneous phonetic imitation is moderated by extra-linguistic factors such as the valence of assigned conditions and social bias. We also find evidence for a decrease in the degree of mergedness in post-exposure productions. Taken together, our results suggest that under the appropriate conditions New Zealanders phonetically accommodate to Australian English and that in the process of speech imitation, mergers-in-progress can, but do not consistently, become less merged. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3781342/ /pubmed/24069011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00653 Text en Copyright © 2013 Babel, McAuliffe and Haber. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Babel, Molly McAuliffe, Michael Haber, Graham Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation? |
title | Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation? |
title_full | Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation? |
title_fullStr | Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation? |
title_short | Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation? |
title_sort | can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT babelmolly canmergersinprogressbeunmergedinspeechaccommodation AT mcauliffemichael canmergersinprogressbeunmergedinspeechaccommodation AT habergraham canmergersinprogressbeunmergedinspeechaccommodation |