Cargando…

Early Electrophysiological Abnormalities and Clinical Neuropathy: A prospective study in patients with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to elucidate whether subclinical nerve dysfunction as reflected by neurophysiological testing predicts the development of clinical neuropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients were studied twice with neurophysiolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hyllienmark, Lars, Alstrand, Nils, Jonsson, Björn, Ludvigsson, Johnny, Cooray, Gerald, Wahlberg-Topp, Jeanette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23723354
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2226
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to elucidate whether subclinical nerve dysfunction as reflected by neurophysiological testing predicts the development of clinical neuropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients were studied twice with neurophysiological measurements at baseline and at follow-up. At baseline, patients were 15.5 ± 3.22 years (range 7–22 years) of age, and duration of diabetes was 6.8 ± 3.3 years. At follow-up, patients were 20–35 years of age, and disease duration was 20 ± 5.3 years (range 10–31 years). RESULTS: At baseline, patients showed modestly reduced nerve conduction velocities and amplitudes compared with healthy subjects, but all were free of clinical neuropathy. At follow-up, clinical neuropathy was present in nine (15%) patients. These patients had a more pronounced reduction in peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV), median MCV, and sural sensory nerve action potential at baseline (P < 0.010–0.003). In simple logistic regression analyses, the predictor with the strongest association with clinical neuropathy was baseline HbA(1c) (R(2) = 48%, odds ratio 7.9, P < 0.002) followed by peroneal MCV at baseline (R(2) = 38%, odds ratio 0.6, P < 0.006). With the use of a stepwise forward analysis that included all predictors, first baseline HbA(1c) and then only peroneal MCV at baseline entered significantly (R(2) = 61%). Neuropathy impairment assessment showed a stronger correlation with baseline HbA(1c) (ρ = 0.40, P < 0.002) than with follow-up HbA(1c) (ρ = 0.034, P < 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Early defects in nerve conduction velocity predict the development of diabetic neuropathy. However, the strongest predictor was HbA(1c) during the first years of the disease.