Cargando…

Update on rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction

As anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has evolved to less invasive, more anatomical approaches, rehabilitation of the injured athlete has likewise become more progressive and innovative, with a sound understanding of graft and fixation strength and biologic healing-remodeling constraint...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nyland, John, Brand, Emily, Fisher, Brent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24198553
_version_ 1782285486182629376
author Nyland, John
Brand, Emily
Fisher, Brent
author_facet Nyland, John
Brand, Emily
Fisher, Brent
author_sort Nyland, John
collection PubMed
description As anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has evolved to less invasive, more anatomical approaches, rehabilitation of the injured athlete has likewise become more progressive and innovative, with a sound understanding of graft and fixation strength and biologic healing-remodeling constraints. This review discusses these innovations including specific considerations before surgery, when planning rehabilitation timetables, and the importance of reestablishing nonimpaired active and passive knee range of motion and biarticular musculotendinous extensibility in positions of function. Concepts of self-efficacy or confidence and reestablishing the “athlete role” are also addressed. Since ACL injury and reinjury are largely related to the influence of structure-form-function on dynamic knee joint stability, the interrelationships between sensorimotor, neuromuscular, and conventional resistance training are also discussed. Although pivot shift “giving way” relates to function loss following ACL injury, anterior translational laxity often does not. Although there is growing evidence that progressive eccentric training may benefit the patient following ACL reconstruction, there is less evidence supporting the use of functional ACL knee braces. Of considerable importance is selecting and achieving a criteria-based progression to sports-specific training, reestablishing osseous homeostasis and improved bone density, blending open and closed kinetic chain exercises at the appropriate time period, and appreciating the influence of the trunk, upper extremities, and sports equipment use on knee loads. We believe that knee dysfunction and functional recovery should be considered from a local, regional, and global perspective. These concepts are consolidated into our approach to prepare patients for return to play including field testing and maintenance training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3781865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37818652013-11-06 Update on rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction Nyland, John Brand, Emily Fisher, Brent Open Access J Sports Med Review As anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has evolved to less invasive, more anatomical approaches, rehabilitation of the injured athlete has likewise become more progressive and innovative, with a sound understanding of graft and fixation strength and biologic healing-remodeling constraints. This review discusses these innovations including specific considerations before surgery, when planning rehabilitation timetables, and the importance of reestablishing nonimpaired active and passive knee range of motion and biarticular musculotendinous extensibility in positions of function. Concepts of self-efficacy or confidence and reestablishing the “athlete role” are also addressed. Since ACL injury and reinjury are largely related to the influence of structure-form-function on dynamic knee joint stability, the interrelationships between sensorimotor, neuromuscular, and conventional resistance training are also discussed. Although pivot shift “giving way” relates to function loss following ACL injury, anterior translational laxity often does not. Although there is growing evidence that progressive eccentric training may benefit the patient following ACL reconstruction, there is less evidence supporting the use of functional ACL knee braces. Of considerable importance is selecting and achieving a criteria-based progression to sports-specific training, reestablishing osseous homeostasis and improved bone density, blending open and closed kinetic chain exercises at the appropriate time period, and appreciating the influence of the trunk, upper extremities, and sports equipment use on knee loads. We believe that knee dysfunction and functional recovery should be considered from a local, regional, and global perspective. These concepts are consolidated into our approach to prepare patients for return to play including field testing and maintenance training. Dove Medical Press 2010-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3781865/ /pubmed/24198553 Text en © 2010 Nyland et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Nyland, John
Brand, Emily
Fisher, Brent
Update on rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction
title Update on rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction
title_full Update on rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction
title_fullStr Update on rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Update on rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction
title_short Update on rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction
title_sort update on rehabilitation following acl reconstruction
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3781865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24198553
work_keys_str_mv AT nylandjohn updateonrehabilitationfollowingaclreconstruction
AT brandemily updateonrehabilitationfollowingaclreconstruction
AT fisherbrent updateonrehabilitationfollowingaclreconstruction