Cargando…

Comparison of the direct fluorescence assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of influenza virus A and B in immunocompromised patients

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of two methods for the detection of influenza virus in immunocompromised transplant patients. METHODS: A total of 475 respiratory samples, 236 from patients in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program and 239 from kidney transplant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perosa, Ana Helena, Watanabe, Aripuanã S. A., Guatura, Sandra B., Silva, Ellen R. M., Granato, Celso, Bellei, Nancy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3782734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24141835
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(09)05
_version_ 1782285604061446144
author Perosa, Ana Helena
Watanabe, Aripuanã S. A.
Guatura, Sandra B.
Silva, Ellen R. M.
Granato, Celso
Bellei, Nancy
author_facet Perosa, Ana Helena
Watanabe, Aripuanã S. A.
Guatura, Sandra B.
Silva, Ellen R. M.
Granato, Celso
Bellei, Nancy
author_sort Perosa, Ana Helena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of two methods for the detection of influenza virus in immunocompromised transplant patients. METHODS: A total of 475 respiratory samples, 236 from patients in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program and 239 from kidney transplant patients, were analyzed by a direct fluorescence assay and the Centers for Disease Control real-time polymerase chain reaction protocol for influenza A and B detection. RESULTS: Influenza detection using either method was 7.6% in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant group and 30.5% in the kidney transplant patient group. Influenza detection by real-time polymerase chain reaction yielded a higher positive rate compared with fluorescence than that reported by other studies, and this difference was more pronounced for influenza A. The fluorescence assay sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and kappa coefficient were 17.6%, 100%, 1, 0.83, and 0.256, respectively, and lower detection rates occurred in the kidney transplant patients. CONCLUSIONS: The real-time polymerase chain reaction performance and the associated turnaround time for a large number of samples support the choice of this method for use in different routine diagnostic settings and influenza surveillance in high-risk patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3782734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37827342013-09-25 Comparison of the direct fluorescence assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of influenza virus A and B in immunocompromised patients Perosa, Ana Helena Watanabe, Aripuanã S. A. Guatura, Sandra B. Silva, Ellen R. M. Granato, Celso Bellei, Nancy Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Science OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of two methods for the detection of influenza virus in immunocompromised transplant patients. METHODS: A total of 475 respiratory samples, 236 from patients in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program and 239 from kidney transplant patients, were analyzed by a direct fluorescence assay and the Centers for Disease Control real-time polymerase chain reaction protocol for influenza A and B detection. RESULTS: Influenza detection using either method was 7.6% in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant group and 30.5% in the kidney transplant patient group. Influenza detection by real-time polymerase chain reaction yielded a higher positive rate compared with fluorescence than that reported by other studies, and this difference was more pronounced for influenza A. The fluorescence assay sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and kappa coefficient were 17.6%, 100%, 1, 0.83, and 0.256, respectively, and lower detection rates occurred in the kidney transplant patients. CONCLUSIONS: The real-time polymerase chain reaction performance and the associated turnaround time for a large number of samples support the choice of this method for use in different routine diagnostic settings and influenza surveillance in high-risk patients. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3782734/ /pubmed/24141835 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(09)05 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Perosa, Ana Helena
Watanabe, Aripuanã S. A.
Guatura, Sandra B.
Silva, Ellen R. M.
Granato, Celso
Bellei, Nancy
Comparison of the direct fluorescence assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of influenza virus A and B in immunocompromised patients
title Comparison of the direct fluorescence assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of influenza virus A and B in immunocompromised patients
title_full Comparison of the direct fluorescence assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of influenza virus A and B in immunocompromised patients
title_fullStr Comparison of the direct fluorescence assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of influenza virus A and B in immunocompromised patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the direct fluorescence assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of influenza virus A and B in immunocompromised patients
title_short Comparison of the direct fluorescence assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of influenza virus A and B in immunocompromised patients
title_sort comparison of the direct fluorescence assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of influenza virus a and b in immunocompromised patients
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3782734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24141835
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(09)05
work_keys_str_mv AT perosaanahelena comparisonofthedirectfluorescenceassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthedetectionofinfluenzavirusaandbinimmunocompromisedpatients
AT watanabearipuanasa comparisonofthedirectfluorescenceassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthedetectionofinfluenzavirusaandbinimmunocompromisedpatients
AT guaturasandrab comparisonofthedirectfluorescenceassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthedetectionofinfluenzavirusaandbinimmunocompromisedpatients
AT silvaellenrm comparisonofthedirectfluorescenceassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthedetectionofinfluenzavirusaandbinimmunocompromisedpatients
AT granatocelso comparisonofthedirectfluorescenceassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthedetectionofinfluenzavirusaandbinimmunocompromisedpatients
AT belleinancy comparisonofthedirectfluorescenceassayandrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthedetectionofinfluenzavirusaandbinimmunocompromisedpatients