Cargando…
Automatic Evaluation of Progression Angle and Fetal Head Station through Intrapartum Echographic Monitoring
Labor progression is routinely assessed through transvaginal digital inspections, meaning that the clinical decisions taken during the most delicate phase of pregnancy are subjective and scarcely supported by technological devices. In response to such inadequacies, we combined intrapartum echographi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3782760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24106524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/278978 |
_version_ | 1782285607737753600 |
---|---|
author | Casciaro, Sergio Conversano, Francesco Casciaro, Ernesto Soloperto, Giulia Perrone, Emanuele Di Renzo, Gian Carlo Perrone, Antonio |
author_facet | Casciaro, Sergio Conversano, Francesco Casciaro, Ernesto Soloperto, Giulia Perrone, Emanuele Di Renzo, Gian Carlo Perrone, Antonio |
author_sort | Casciaro, Sergio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Labor progression is routinely assessed through transvaginal digital inspections, meaning that the clinical decisions taken during the most delicate phase of pregnancy are subjective and scarcely supported by technological devices. In response to such inadequacies, we combined intrapartum echographic acquisitions with advanced tracking algorithms in a new method for noninvasive, quantitative, and automatic monitoring of labor. Aim of this work is the preliminary clinical validation and accuracy evaluation of our automatic algorithm in assessing progression angle (PA) and fetal head station (FHS). A cohort of 10 parturients underwent conventional labor management, with additional translabial echographic examinations after each uterine contraction. PA and FHS were evaluated by our automatic algorithm on the acquired images. Additionally, an experienced clinical sonographer, blinded regarding the algorithm results, quantified on the same acquisitions of the two parameters through manual contouring, which were considered as the standard reference in the evaluation of automatic algorithm and routine method accuracies. The automatic algorithm (mean error ± 2SD) provided a global accuracy of 0.9 ± 4.0 mm for FHS and 4° ± 9° for PA, which is far above the diagnostic ability shown by the routine method, and therefore it resulted in a reliable method for earlier identification of abnormal labor patterns in support of clinical decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3782760 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37827602013-10-08 Automatic Evaluation of Progression Angle and Fetal Head Station through Intrapartum Echographic Monitoring Casciaro, Sergio Conversano, Francesco Casciaro, Ernesto Soloperto, Giulia Perrone, Emanuele Di Renzo, Gian Carlo Perrone, Antonio Comput Math Methods Med Research Article Labor progression is routinely assessed through transvaginal digital inspections, meaning that the clinical decisions taken during the most delicate phase of pregnancy are subjective and scarcely supported by technological devices. In response to such inadequacies, we combined intrapartum echographic acquisitions with advanced tracking algorithms in a new method for noninvasive, quantitative, and automatic monitoring of labor. Aim of this work is the preliminary clinical validation and accuracy evaluation of our automatic algorithm in assessing progression angle (PA) and fetal head station (FHS). A cohort of 10 parturients underwent conventional labor management, with additional translabial echographic examinations after each uterine contraction. PA and FHS were evaluated by our automatic algorithm on the acquired images. Additionally, an experienced clinical sonographer, blinded regarding the algorithm results, quantified on the same acquisitions of the two parameters through manual contouring, which were considered as the standard reference in the evaluation of automatic algorithm and routine method accuracies. The automatic algorithm (mean error ± 2SD) provided a global accuracy of 0.9 ± 4.0 mm for FHS and 4° ± 9° for PA, which is far above the diagnostic ability shown by the routine method, and therefore it resulted in a reliable method for earlier identification of abnormal labor patterns in support of clinical decisions. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3782760/ /pubmed/24106524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/278978 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sergio Casciaro et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Casciaro, Sergio Conversano, Francesco Casciaro, Ernesto Soloperto, Giulia Perrone, Emanuele Di Renzo, Gian Carlo Perrone, Antonio Automatic Evaluation of Progression Angle and Fetal Head Station through Intrapartum Echographic Monitoring |
title | Automatic Evaluation of Progression Angle and Fetal Head Station through Intrapartum Echographic Monitoring |
title_full | Automatic Evaluation of Progression Angle and Fetal Head Station through Intrapartum Echographic Monitoring |
title_fullStr | Automatic Evaluation of Progression Angle and Fetal Head Station through Intrapartum Echographic Monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic Evaluation of Progression Angle and Fetal Head Station through Intrapartum Echographic Monitoring |
title_short | Automatic Evaluation of Progression Angle and Fetal Head Station through Intrapartum Echographic Monitoring |
title_sort | automatic evaluation of progression angle and fetal head station through intrapartum echographic monitoring |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3782760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24106524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/278978 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT casciarosergio automaticevaluationofprogressionangleandfetalheadstationthroughintrapartumechographicmonitoring AT conversanofrancesco automaticevaluationofprogressionangleandfetalheadstationthroughintrapartumechographicmonitoring AT casciaroernesto automaticevaluationofprogressionangleandfetalheadstationthroughintrapartumechographicmonitoring AT solopertogiulia automaticevaluationofprogressionangleandfetalheadstationthroughintrapartumechographicmonitoring AT perroneemanuele automaticevaluationofprogressionangleandfetalheadstationthroughintrapartumechographicmonitoring AT direnzogiancarlo automaticevaluationofprogressionangleandfetalheadstationthroughintrapartumechographicmonitoring AT perroneantonio automaticevaluationofprogressionangleandfetalheadstationthroughintrapartumechographicmonitoring |