Cargando…

Alternative Agents to Prevent Fogging in Head and Neck Endoscopy

BACKGROUND: The essential factor for diagnosis and treatment of diseases in head and neck endoscopy is the visibility of the image. An anti-fogging agent can reduce this problem by minimizing surface tension to prevent the condensation of water in the form of small droplets on a surface. There is no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piromchai, Patorn, Kasemsiri, Pornthep, Thanaviratananich, Sanguansak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3783309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24179399
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMENT.S6597
_version_ 1782285646163869696
author Piromchai, Patorn
Kasemsiri, Pornthep
Thanaviratananich, Sanguansak
author_facet Piromchai, Patorn
Kasemsiri, Pornthep
Thanaviratananich, Sanguansak
author_sort Piromchai, Patorn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The essential factor for diagnosis and treatment of diseases in head and neck endoscopy is the visibility of the image. An anti-fogging agent can reduce this problem by minimizing surface tension to prevent the condensation of water in the form of small droplets on a surface. There is no report on the use of hibiscrub(®) or baby shampoo to reduce fogging in the literature. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy between commercial anti-fogging agent, hibiscrub(®) and baby shampoo to reduce fogging for the use in head and neck endoscopy. METHODS: The study was conducted at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University in August 2010. Commercial anti-fogging agent, baby shampoo and hibiscrub(®) were applied on rigid endoscope lens before putting them into a mist generator. The images were taken at baseline, 15 seconds, 30 seconds and 1 minute. The images’ identifiers were removed before they were sent to two evaluators. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to rate the image quality from 0 to 10. RESULTS: The difference in mean VAS score between anti-fogging agent, baby shampoo and hibiscrub(®) versus no agent were 5.46, 4.45 and 2.1 respectively. The commercial anti-fogging agent and baby shampoo had most protective benefit and performed significantly better than no agent (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Baby shampoo is an effective agent to prevent fogging during head and neck endoscopy and compares favourably with commercial anti-fogging agent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3783309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37833092013-10-31 Alternative Agents to Prevent Fogging in Head and Neck Endoscopy Piromchai, Patorn Kasemsiri, Pornthep Thanaviratananich, Sanguansak Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat Original Research BACKGROUND: The essential factor for diagnosis and treatment of diseases in head and neck endoscopy is the visibility of the image. An anti-fogging agent can reduce this problem by minimizing surface tension to prevent the condensation of water in the form of small droplets on a surface. There is no report on the use of hibiscrub(®) or baby shampoo to reduce fogging in the literature. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy between commercial anti-fogging agent, hibiscrub(®) and baby shampoo to reduce fogging for the use in head and neck endoscopy. METHODS: The study was conducted at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University in August 2010. Commercial anti-fogging agent, baby shampoo and hibiscrub(®) were applied on rigid endoscope lens before putting them into a mist generator. The images were taken at baseline, 15 seconds, 30 seconds and 1 minute. The images’ identifiers were removed before they were sent to two evaluators. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to rate the image quality from 0 to 10. RESULTS: The difference in mean VAS score between anti-fogging agent, baby shampoo and hibiscrub(®) versus no agent were 5.46, 4.45 and 2.1 respectively. The commercial anti-fogging agent and baby shampoo had most protective benefit and performed significantly better than no agent (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Baby shampoo is an effective agent to prevent fogging during head and neck endoscopy and compares favourably with commercial anti-fogging agent. Libertas Academica 2011-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3783309/ /pubmed/24179399 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMENT.S6597 Text en © the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Piromchai, Patorn
Kasemsiri, Pornthep
Thanaviratananich, Sanguansak
Alternative Agents to Prevent Fogging in Head and Neck Endoscopy
title Alternative Agents to Prevent Fogging in Head and Neck Endoscopy
title_full Alternative Agents to Prevent Fogging in Head and Neck Endoscopy
title_fullStr Alternative Agents to Prevent Fogging in Head and Neck Endoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Alternative Agents to Prevent Fogging in Head and Neck Endoscopy
title_short Alternative Agents to Prevent Fogging in Head and Neck Endoscopy
title_sort alternative agents to prevent fogging in head and neck endoscopy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3783309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24179399
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMENT.S6597
work_keys_str_mv AT piromchaipatorn alternativeagentstopreventfogginginheadandneckendoscopy
AT kasemsiripornthep alternativeagentstopreventfogginginheadandneckendoscopy
AT thanaviratananichsanguansak alternativeagentstopreventfogginginheadandneckendoscopy