Cargando…

Flexible spatial perspective-taking: conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks

Research on spatial perspective-taking often focuses on the cognitive processes of isolated individuals as they adopt or maintain imagined perspectives. Collaborative studies of spatial perspective-taking typically examine speakers' linguistic choices, while overlooking their underlying process...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galati, Alexia, Avraamides, Marios N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3783978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133432
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00618
_version_ 1782285750904029184
author Galati, Alexia
Avraamides, Marios N.
author_facet Galati, Alexia
Avraamides, Marios N.
author_sort Galati, Alexia
collection PubMed
description Research on spatial perspective-taking often focuses on the cognitive processes of isolated individuals as they adopt or maintain imagined perspectives. Collaborative studies of spatial perspective-taking typically examine speakers' linguistic choices, while overlooking their underlying processes and representations. We review evidence from two collaborative experiments that examine the contribution of social and representational cues to spatial perspective choices in both language and the organization of spatial memory. Across experiments, speakers organized their memory representations according to the convergence of various cues. When layouts were randomly configured and did not afford intrinsic cues, speakers encoded their partner's viewpoint in memory, if available, but did not use it as an organizing direction. On the other hand, when the layout afforded an intrinsic structure, speakers organized their spatial memories according to the person-centered perspective reinforced by the layout's structure. Similarly, in descriptions, speakers considered multiple cues whether available a priori or at the interaction. They used partner-centered expressions more frequently (e.g., “to your right”) when the partner's viewpoint was misaligned by a small offset or coincided with the layout's structure. Conversely, they used egocentric expressions more frequently when their own viewpoint coincided with the intrinsic structure or when the partner was misaligned by a computationally difficult, oblique offset. Based on these findings we advocate for a framework for flexible perspective-taking: people weigh multiple cues (including social ones) to make attributions about the relative difficulty of perspective-taking for each partner, and adapt behavior to minimize their collective effort. This framework is not specialized for spatial reasoning but instead emerges from the same principles and memory-depended processes that govern perspective-taking in non-spatial tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3783978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37839782013-10-16 Flexible spatial perspective-taking: conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks Galati, Alexia Avraamides, Marios N. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Research on spatial perspective-taking often focuses on the cognitive processes of isolated individuals as they adopt or maintain imagined perspectives. Collaborative studies of spatial perspective-taking typically examine speakers' linguistic choices, while overlooking their underlying processes and representations. We review evidence from two collaborative experiments that examine the contribution of social and representational cues to spatial perspective choices in both language and the organization of spatial memory. Across experiments, speakers organized their memory representations according to the convergence of various cues. When layouts were randomly configured and did not afford intrinsic cues, speakers encoded their partner's viewpoint in memory, if available, but did not use it as an organizing direction. On the other hand, when the layout afforded an intrinsic structure, speakers organized their spatial memories according to the person-centered perspective reinforced by the layout's structure. Similarly, in descriptions, speakers considered multiple cues whether available a priori or at the interaction. They used partner-centered expressions more frequently (e.g., “to your right”) when the partner's viewpoint was misaligned by a small offset or coincided with the layout's structure. Conversely, they used egocentric expressions more frequently when their own viewpoint coincided with the intrinsic structure or when the partner was misaligned by a computationally difficult, oblique offset. Based on these findings we advocate for a framework for flexible perspective-taking: people weigh multiple cues (including social ones) to make attributions about the relative difficulty of perspective-taking for each partner, and adapt behavior to minimize their collective effort. This framework is not specialized for spatial reasoning but instead emerges from the same principles and memory-depended processes that govern perspective-taking in non-spatial tasks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3783978/ /pubmed/24133432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00618 Text en Copyright © 2013 Galati and Avraamides. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Galati, Alexia
Avraamides, Marios N.
Flexible spatial perspective-taking: conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks
title Flexible spatial perspective-taking: conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks
title_full Flexible spatial perspective-taking: conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks
title_fullStr Flexible spatial perspective-taking: conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks
title_full_unstemmed Flexible spatial perspective-taking: conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks
title_short Flexible spatial perspective-taking: conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks
title_sort flexible spatial perspective-taking: conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3783978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133432
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00618
work_keys_str_mv AT galatialexia flexiblespatialperspectivetakingconversationalpartnersweighmultiplecuesincollaborativetasks
AT avraamidesmariosn flexiblespatialperspectivetakingconversationalpartnersweighmultiplecuesincollaborativetasks