Cargando…

The ON-Q pain management system in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: Management of postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare postoperative surgical site pain in gynecologic cancer patients who underwent elective extended lower midline laparotomy and managed their pain with either the ON-Q pain management system (surgical incision site pain relief system, ON-Q pump) or an in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Dawn, Lee, Yoo Jin, Jo, Mi Hyun, Park, Hyun Jong, Lim, Ga Won, Cho, Hanbyoul, Nam, Eun Ji, Kim, Sang Wun, Kim, Jae Hoon, Kim, Young Tae, Kim, Sunghoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endocrinology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimal Invasive Surgery; Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Korean Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3784090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24327987
http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/OGS.2013.56.2.93
_version_ 1782285766536200192
author Chung, Dawn
Lee, Yoo Jin
Jo, Mi Hyun
Park, Hyun Jong
Lim, Ga Won
Cho, Hanbyoul
Nam, Eun Ji
Kim, Sang Wun
Kim, Jae Hoon
Kim, Young Tae
Kim, Sunghoon
author_facet Chung, Dawn
Lee, Yoo Jin
Jo, Mi Hyun
Park, Hyun Jong
Lim, Ga Won
Cho, Hanbyoul
Nam, Eun Ji
Kim, Sang Wun
Kim, Jae Hoon
Kim, Young Tae
Kim, Sunghoon
author_sort Chung, Dawn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare postoperative surgical site pain in gynecologic cancer patients who underwent elective extended lower midline laparotomy and managed their pain with either the ON-Q pain management system (surgical incision site pain relief system, ON-Q pump) or an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia pump (IV PCA). METHODS: Twenty gynecologic cancer patients who underwent elective extended lower midline laparotomy were divided into two groups. One group received a 72-hour continuous wound perfusion of the local anesthetic ropivacaine (0.5%, study group) into the supraperitoneal layer of the abdominal incision through the ON-Q pump. The other group received intravenous infusion pump of patient-controlled analgesia (fentanyl citrate 20 mg/mL · kg+ondansetron hydrochloride 16 mg/8 mL+normal saline). Postoperative pain was assessed immediately and at 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery using the visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Postoperative surgical site pain scores at 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery were lower in the ON-Q group than the IV PCA group. Pain scores at 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery were significantly different between the two groups (P=0.023, P<0.001). Overall painkiller administration was higher in the ON-Q group but this difference was not statistically significant (5.1 vs. 4.3, P=0.481). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the ON-Q pain management system is a more effective approach than IV PCA for acute postoperative surgical site pain relief after extended lower midline laparotomy in gynecologic cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3784090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endocrinology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimal Invasive Surgery; Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Korean Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37840902013-12-10 The ON-Q pain management system in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: Management of postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia Chung, Dawn Lee, Yoo Jin Jo, Mi Hyun Park, Hyun Jong Lim, Ga Won Cho, Hanbyoul Nam, Eun Ji Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Jae Hoon Kim, Young Tae Kim, Sunghoon Obstet Gynecol Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare postoperative surgical site pain in gynecologic cancer patients who underwent elective extended lower midline laparotomy and managed their pain with either the ON-Q pain management system (surgical incision site pain relief system, ON-Q pump) or an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia pump (IV PCA). METHODS: Twenty gynecologic cancer patients who underwent elective extended lower midline laparotomy were divided into two groups. One group received a 72-hour continuous wound perfusion of the local anesthetic ropivacaine (0.5%, study group) into the supraperitoneal layer of the abdominal incision through the ON-Q pump. The other group received intravenous infusion pump of patient-controlled analgesia (fentanyl citrate 20 mg/mL · kg+ondansetron hydrochloride 16 mg/8 mL+normal saline). Postoperative pain was assessed immediately and at 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery using the visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Postoperative surgical site pain scores at 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery were lower in the ON-Q group than the IV PCA group. Pain scores at 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery were significantly different between the two groups (P=0.023, P<0.001). Overall painkiller administration was higher in the ON-Q group but this difference was not statistically significant (5.1 vs. 4.3, P=0.481). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the ON-Q pain management system is a more effective approach than IV PCA for acute postoperative surgical site pain relief after extended lower midline laparotomy in gynecologic cancer patients. Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endocrinology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimal Invasive Surgery; Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Korean Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2013-03 2013-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3784090/ /pubmed/24327987 http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/OGS.2013.56.2.93 Text en Copyright © 2013 Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Articles published in Obstet Gynecol Sci are open-access, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chung, Dawn
Lee, Yoo Jin
Jo, Mi Hyun
Park, Hyun Jong
Lim, Ga Won
Cho, Hanbyoul
Nam, Eun Ji
Kim, Sang Wun
Kim, Jae Hoon
Kim, Young Tae
Kim, Sunghoon
The ON-Q pain management system in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: Management of postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
title The ON-Q pain management system in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: Management of postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
title_full The ON-Q pain management system in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: Management of postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
title_fullStr The ON-Q pain management system in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: Management of postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
title_full_unstemmed The ON-Q pain management system in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: Management of postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
title_short The ON-Q pain management system in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: Management of postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
title_sort on-q pain management system in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: management of postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3784090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24327987
http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/OGS.2013.56.2.93
work_keys_str_mv AT chungdawn theonqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT leeyoojin theonqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT jomihyun theonqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT parkhyunjong theonqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT limgawon theonqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT chohanbyoul theonqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT nameunji theonqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT kimsangwun theonqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT kimjaehoon theonqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT kimyoungtae theonqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT kimsunghoon theonqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT chungdawn onqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT leeyoojin onqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT jomihyun onqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT parkhyunjong onqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT limgawon onqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT chohanbyoul onqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT nameunji onqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT kimsangwun onqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT kimjaehoon onqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT kimyoungtae onqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia
AT kimsunghoon onqpainmanagementsysteminelectivegynecologyoncologicsurgerymanagementofpostoperativesurgicalsitepaincomparedtointravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesia