Cargando…
Next generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of neurological disorders using ataxias as a model
Many neurological conditions are caused by immensely heterogeneous gene mutations. The diagnostic process is often long and complex with most patients undergoing multiple invasive and costly investigations without ever reaching a conclusive molecular diagnosis. The advent of massively parallel, next...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3784284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24030952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt236 |
_version_ | 1782477536111886336 |
---|---|
author | Németh, Andrea H. Kwasniewska, Alexandra C. Lise, Stefano Parolin Schnekenberg, Ricardo Becker, Esther B. E. Bera, Katarzyna D. Shanks, Morag E. Gregory, Lorna Buck, David Zameel Cader, M. Talbot, Kevin de Silva, Rajith Fletcher, Nicholas Hastings, Rob Jayawant, Sandeep Morrison, Patrick J. Worth, Paul Taylor, Malcolm Tolmie, John O’Regan, Mary Valentine, Ruth Packham, Emily Evans, Julie Seller, Anneke Ragoussis, Jiannis |
author_facet | Németh, Andrea H. Kwasniewska, Alexandra C. Lise, Stefano Parolin Schnekenberg, Ricardo Becker, Esther B. E. Bera, Katarzyna D. Shanks, Morag E. Gregory, Lorna Buck, David Zameel Cader, M. Talbot, Kevin de Silva, Rajith Fletcher, Nicholas Hastings, Rob Jayawant, Sandeep Morrison, Patrick J. Worth, Paul Taylor, Malcolm Tolmie, John O’Regan, Mary Valentine, Ruth Packham, Emily Evans, Julie Seller, Anneke Ragoussis, Jiannis |
author_sort | Németh, Andrea H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many neurological conditions are caused by immensely heterogeneous gene mutations. The diagnostic process is often long and complex with most patients undergoing multiple invasive and costly investigations without ever reaching a conclusive molecular diagnosis. The advent of massively parallel, next-generation sequencing promises to revolutionize genetic testing and shorten the ‘diagnostic odyssey’ for many of these patients. We performed a pilot study using heterogeneous ataxias as a model neurogenetic disorder to assess the introduction of next-generation sequencing into clinical practice. We captured 58 known human ataxia genes followed by Illumina Next-Generation Sequencing in 50 highly heterogeneous patients with ataxia who had been extensively investigated and were refractory to diagnosis. All cases had been tested for spinocerebellar ataxia 1–3, 6, 7 and Friedrich’s ataxia and had multiple other biochemical, genetic and invasive tests. In those cases where we identified the genetic mutation, we determined the time to diagnosis. Pathogenicity was assessed using a bioinformatics pipeline and novel variants were validated using functional experiments. The overall detection rate in our heterogeneous cohort was 18% and varied from 8.3% in those with an adult onset progressive disorder to 40% in those with a childhood or adolescent onset progressive disorder. The highest detection rate was in those with an adolescent onset and a family history (75%). The majority of cases with detectable mutations had a childhood onset but most are now adults, reflecting the long delay in diagnosis. The delays were primarily related to lack of easily available clinical testing, but other factors included the presence of atypical phenotypes and the use of indirect testing. In the cases where we made an eventual diagnosis, the delay was 3–35 years (mean 18.1 years). Alignment and coverage metrics indicated that the capture and sequencing was highly efficient and the consumable cost was ∼£400 (€460 or US$620). Our pathogenicity interpretation pathway predicted 13 different mutations in eight different genes: PRKCG, TTBK2, SETX, SPTBN2, SACS, MRE11, KCNC3 and DARS2 of which nine were novel including one causing a newly described recessive ataxia syndrome. Genetic testing using targeted capture followed by next-generation sequencing was efficient, cost-effective, and enabled a molecular diagnosis in many refractory cases. A specific challenge of next-generation sequencing data is pathogenicity interpretation, but functional analysis confirmed the pathogenicity of novel variants showing that the pipeline was robust. Our results have broad implications for clinical neurology practice and the approach to diagnostic testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3784284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37842842013-10-01 Next generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of neurological disorders using ataxias as a model Németh, Andrea H. Kwasniewska, Alexandra C. Lise, Stefano Parolin Schnekenberg, Ricardo Becker, Esther B. E. Bera, Katarzyna D. Shanks, Morag E. Gregory, Lorna Buck, David Zameel Cader, M. Talbot, Kevin de Silva, Rajith Fletcher, Nicholas Hastings, Rob Jayawant, Sandeep Morrison, Patrick J. Worth, Paul Taylor, Malcolm Tolmie, John O’Regan, Mary Valentine, Ruth Packham, Emily Evans, Julie Seller, Anneke Ragoussis, Jiannis Brain Original Articles Many neurological conditions are caused by immensely heterogeneous gene mutations. The diagnostic process is often long and complex with most patients undergoing multiple invasive and costly investigations without ever reaching a conclusive molecular diagnosis. The advent of massively parallel, next-generation sequencing promises to revolutionize genetic testing and shorten the ‘diagnostic odyssey’ for many of these patients. We performed a pilot study using heterogeneous ataxias as a model neurogenetic disorder to assess the introduction of next-generation sequencing into clinical practice. We captured 58 known human ataxia genes followed by Illumina Next-Generation Sequencing in 50 highly heterogeneous patients with ataxia who had been extensively investigated and were refractory to diagnosis. All cases had been tested for spinocerebellar ataxia 1–3, 6, 7 and Friedrich’s ataxia and had multiple other biochemical, genetic and invasive tests. In those cases where we identified the genetic mutation, we determined the time to diagnosis. Pathogenicity was assessed using a bioinformatics pipeline and novel variants were validated using functional experiments. The overall detection rate in our heterogeneous cohort was 18% and varied from 8.3% in those with an adult onset progressive disorder to 40% in those with a childhood or adolescent onset progressive disorder. The highest detection rate was in those with an adolescent onset and a family history (75%). The majority of cases with detectable mutations had a childhood onset but most are now adults, reflecting the long delay in diagnosis. The delays were primarily related to lack of easily available clinical testing, but other factors included the presence of atypical phenotypes and the use of indirect testing. In the cases where we made an eventual diagnosis, the delay was 3–35 years (mean 18.1 years). Alignment and coverage metrics indicated that the capture and sequencing was highly efficient and the consumable cost was ∼£400 (€460 or US$620). Our pathogenicity interpretation pathway predicted 13 different mutations in eight different genes: PRKCG, TTBK2, SETX, SPTBN2, SACS, MRE11, KCNC3 and DARS2 of which nine were novel including one causing a newly described recessive ataxia syndrome. Genetic testing using targeted capture followed by next-generation sequencing was efficient, cost-effective, and enabled a molecular diagnosis in many refractory cases. A specific challenge of next-generation sequencing data is pathogenicity interpretation, but functional analysis confirmed the pathogenicity of novel variants showing that the pipeline was robust. Our results have broad implications for clinical neurology practice and the approach to diagnostic testing. Oxford University Press 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3784284/ /pubmed/24030952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt236 Text en © The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Németh, Andrea H. Kwasniewska, Alexandra C. Lise, Stefano Parolin Schnekenberg, Ricardo Becker, Esther B. E. Bera, Katarzyna D. Shanks, Morag E. Gregory, Lorna Buck, David Zameel Cader, M. Talbot, Kevin de Silva, Rajith Fletcher, Nicholas Hastings, Rob Jayawant, Sandeep Morrison, Patrick J. Worth, Paul Taylor, Malcolm Tolmie, John O’Regan, Mary Valentine, Ruth Packham, Emily Evans, Julie Seller, Anneke Ragoussis, Jiannis Next generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of neurological disorders using ataxias as a model |
title | Next generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of neurological disorders using ataxias as a model |
title_full | Next generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of neurological disorders using ataxias as a model |
title_fullStr | Next generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of neurological disorders using ataxias as a model |
title_full_unstemmed | Next generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of neurological disorders using ataxias as a model |
title_short | Next generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of neurological disorders using ataxias as a model |
title_sort | next generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of neurological disorders using ataxias as a model |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3784284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24030952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt236 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nemethandreah nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT kwasniewskaalexandrac nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT lisestefano nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT parolinschnekenbergricardo nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT beckerestherbe nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT berakatarzynad nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT shanksmorage nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT gregorylorna nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT buckdavid nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT zameelcaderm nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT talbotkevin nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT desilvarajith nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT fletchernicholas nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT hastingsrob nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT jayawantsandeep nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT morrisonpatrickj nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT worthpaul nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT taylormalcolm nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT tolmiejohn nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT oreganmary nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT valentineruth nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT packhamemily nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT evansjulie nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT selleranneke nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel AT ragoussisjiannis nextgenerationsequencingformoleculardiagnosisofneurologicaldisordersusingataxiasasamodel |