Cargando…

Dealing with the Evolutionary Downside of CRISPR Immunity: Bacteria and Beneficial Plasmids

The immune systems that protect organisms from infectious agents invariably have a cost for the host. In bacteria and archaea CRISPR-Cas loci can serve as adaptive immune systems that protect these microbes from infectiously transmitted DNAs. When those DNAs are borne by lytic viruses (phages), this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Wenyan, Maniv, Inbal, Arain, Fawaz, Wang, Yaying, Levin, Bruce R., Marraffini, Luciano A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3784566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24086164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003844
_version_ 1782477581376815104
author Jiang, Wenyan
Maniv, Inbal
Arain, Fawaz
Wang, Yaying
Levin, Bruce R.
Marraffini, Luciano A.
author_facet Jiang, Wenyan
Maniv, Inbal
Arain, Fawaz
Wang, Yaying
Levin, Bruce R.
Marraffini, Luciano A.
author_sort Jiang, Wenyan
collection PubMed
description The immune systems that protect organisms from infectious agents invariably have a cost for the host. In bacteria and archaea CRISPR-Cas loci can serve as adaptive immune systems that protect these microbes from infectiously transmitted DNAs. When those DNAs are borne by lytic viruses (phages), this protection can provide a considerable advantage. CRISPR-Cas immunity can also prevent cells from acquiring plasmids and free DNA bearing genes that increase their fitness. Here, we use a combination of experiments and mathematical-computer simulation models to explore this downside of CRISPR-Cas immunity and its implications for the maintenance of CRISPR-Cas loci in microbial populations. We analyzed the conjugational transfer of the staphylococcal plasmid pG0400 into Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62a recipients that bear a CRISPR-Cas locus targeting this plasmid. Contrary to what is anticipated for lytic phages, which evade CRISPR by mutations in the target region, the evasion of CRISPR immunity by plasmids occurs at the level of the host through loss of functional CRISPR-Cas immunity. The results of our experiments and models indicate that more than 10(−4) of the cells in CRISPR-Cas positive populations are defective or deleted for the CRISPR-Cas region and thereby able to receive and carry the plasmid. Most intriguingly, the loss of CRISPR function even by large deletions can have little or no fitness cost in vitro. These theoretical and experimental results can account for the considerable variation in the existence, number and function of CRISPR-Cas loci within and between bacterial species. We postulate that as a consequence of the opposing positive and negative selection for immunity, CRISPR-Cas systems are in a continuous state of flux. They are lost when they bear immunity to laterally transferred beneficial genes, re-acquired by horizontal gene transfer, and ascend in environments where phage are a major source of mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3784566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37845662013-10-01 Dealing with the Evolutionary Downside of CRISPR Immunity: Bacteria and Beneficial Plasmids Jiang, Wenyan Maniv, Inbal Arain, Fawaz Wang, Yaying Levin, Bruce R. Marraffini, Luciano A. PLoS Genet Research Article The immune systems that protect organisms from infectious agents invariably have a cost for the host. In bacteria and archaea CRISPR-Cas loci can serve as adaptive immune systems that protect these microbes from infectiously transmitted DNAs. When those DNAs are borne by lytic viruses (phages), this protection can provide a considerable advantage. CRISPR-Cas immunity can also prevent cells from acquiring plasmids and free DNA bearing genes that increase their fitness. Here, we use a combination of experiments and mathematical-computer simulation models to explore this downside of CRISPR-Cas immunity and its implications for the maintenance of CRISPR-Cas loci in microbial populations. We analyzed the conjugational transfer of the staphylococcal plasmid pG0400 into Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62a recipients that bear a CRISPR-Cas locus targeting this plasmid. Contrary to what is anticipated for lytic phages, which evade CRISPR by mutations in the target region, the evasion of CRISPR immunity by plasmids occurs at the level of the host through loss of functional CRISPR-Cas immunity. The results of our experiments and models indicate that more than 10(−4) of the cells in CRISPR-Cas positive populations are defective or deleted for the CRISPR-Cas region and thereby able to receive and carry the plasmid. Most intriguingly, the loss of CRISPR function even by large deletions can have little or no fitness cost in vitro. These theoretical and experimental results can account for the considerable variation in the existence, number and function of CRISPR-Cas loci within and between bacterial species. We postulate that as a consequence of the opposing positive and negative selection for immunity, CRISPR-Cas systems are in a continuous state of flux. They are lost when they bear immunity to laterally transferred beneficial genes, re-acquired by horizontal gene transfer, and ascend in environments where phage are a major source of mortality. Public Library of Science 2013-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3784566/ /pubmed/24086164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003844 Text en © 2013 Jiang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jiang, Wenyan
Maniv, Inbal
Arain, Fawaz
Wang, Yaying
Levin, Bruce R.
Marraffini, Luciano A.
Dealing with the Evolutionary Downside of CRISPR Immunity: Bacteria and Beneficial Plasmids
title Dealing with the Evolutionary Downside of CRISPR Immunity: Bacteria and Beneficial Plasmids
title_full Dealing with the Evolutionary Downside of CRISPR Immunity: Bacteria and Beneficial Plasmids
title_fullStr Dealing with the Evolutionary Downside of CRISPR Immunity: Bacteria and Beneficial Plasmids
title_full_unstemmed Dealing with the Evolutionary Downside of CRISPR Immunity: Bacteria and Beneficial Plasmids
title_short Dealing with the Evolutionary Downside of CRISPR Immunity: Bacteria and Beneficial Plasmids
title_sort dealing with the evolutionary downside of crispr immunity: bacteria and beneficial plasmids
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3784566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24086164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003844
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangwenyan dealingwiththeevolutionarydownsideofcrisprimmunitybacteriaandbeneficialplasmids
AT manivinbal dealingwiththeevolutionarydownsideofcrisprimmunitybacteriaandbeneficialplasmids
AT arainfawaz dealingwiththeevolutionarydownsideofcrisprimmunitybacteriaandbeneficialplasmids
AT wangyaying dealingwiththeevolutionarydownsideofcrisprimmunitybacteriaandbeneficialplasmids
AT levinbrucer dealingwiththeevolutionarydownsideofcrisprimmunitybacteriaandbeneficialplasmids
AT marraffinilucianoa dealingwiththeevolutionarydownsideofcrisprimmunitybacteriaandbeneficialplasmids