Cargando…

Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies()

A number of studies have investigated procedural learning in dyslexia using serial reaction time (SRT) tasks. Overall, the results have been mixed, with evidence of both impaired and intact learning reported. We undertook a systematic search of studies that examined procedural learning using SRT tas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lum, Jarrad A.G., Ullman, Michael T., Conti-Ramsden, Gina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3784964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23920029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017
_version_ 1782477617480335360
author Lum, Jarrad A.G.
Ullman, Michael T.
Conti-Ramsden, Gina
author_facet Lum, Jarrad A.G.
Ullman, Michael T.
Conti-Ramsden, Gina
author_sort Lum, Jarrad A.G.
collection PubMed
description A number of studies have investigated procedural learning in dyslexia using serial reaction time (SRT) tasks. Overall, the results have been mixed, with evidence of both impaired and intact learning reported. We undertook a systematic search of studies that examined procedural learning using SRT tasks, and synthesized the data using meta-analysis. A total of 14 studies were identified, representing data from 314 individuals with dyslexia and 317 typically developing control participants. The results indicate that, on average, individuals with dyslexia have worse procedural learning abilities than controls, as indexed by sequence learning on the SRT task. The average weighted standardized mean difference (the effect size) was found to be 0.449 (CI(95): .204, .693), and was significant (p < .001). However, moderate levels of heterogeneity were found between study-level effect sizes. Meta-regression analyses indicated that studies with older participants that used SRT tasks with second order conditional sequences, or with older participants that used sequences that were presented a large number of times, were associated with smaller effect sizes. These associations are discussed with respect to compensatory and delayed memory systems in dyslexia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3784964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Pergamon Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37849642013-10-01 Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies() Lum, Jarrad A.G. Ullman, Michael T. Conti-Ramsden, Gina Res Dev Disabil Review Article A number of studies have investigated procedural learning in dyslexia using serial reaction time (SRT) tasks. Overall, the results have been mixed, with evidence of both impaired and intact learning reported. We undertook a systematic search of studies that examined procedural learning using SRT tasks, and synthesized the data using meta-analysis. A total of 14 studies were identified, representing data from 314 individuals with dyslexia and 317 typically developing control participants. The results indicate that, on average, individuals with dyslexia have worse procedural learning abilities than controls, as indexed by sequence learning on the SRT task. The average weighted standardized mean difference (the effect size) was found to be 0.449 (CI(95): .204, .693), and was significant (p < .001). However, moderate levels of heterogeneity were found between study-level effect sizes. Meta-regression analyses indicated that studies with older participants that used SRT tasks with second order conditional sequences, or with older participants that used sequences that were presented a large number of times, were associated with smaller effect sizes. These associations are discussed with respect to compensatory and delayed memory systems in dyslexia. Pergamon Press 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3784964/ /pubmed/23920029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017 Text en © 2013 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Review Article
Lum, Jarrad A.G.
Ullman, Michael T.
Conti-Ramsden, Gina
Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies()
title Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies()
title_full Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies()
title_fullStr Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies()
title_full_unstemmed Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies()
title_short Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies()
title_sort procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies()
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3784964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23920029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017
work_keys_str_mv AT lumjarradag procedurallearningisimpairedindyslexiaevidencefromametaanalysisofserialreactiontimestudies
AT ullmanmichaelt procedurallearningisimpairedindyslexiaevidencefromametaanalysisofserialreactiontimestudies
AT contiramsdengina procedurallearningisimpairedindyslexiaevidencefromametaanalysisofserialreactiontimestudies