Cargando…
Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies()
A number of studies have investigated procedural learning in dyslexia using serial reaction time (SRT) tasks. Overall, the results have been mixed, with evidence of both impaired and intact learning reported. We undertook a systematic search of studies that examined procedural learning using SRT tas...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pergamon Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3784964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23920029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017 |
_version_ | 1782477617480335360 |
---|---|
author | Lum, Jarrad A.G. Ullman, Michael T. Conti-Ramsden, Gina |
author_facet | Lum, Jarrad A.G. Ullman, Michael T. Conti-Ramsden, Gina |
author_sort | Lum, Jarrad A.G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A number of studies have investigated procedural learning in dyslexia using serial reaction time (SRT) tasks. Overall, the results have been mixed, with evidence of both impaired and intact learning reported. We undertook a systematic search of studies that examined procedural learning using SRT tasks, and synthesized the data using meta-analysis. A total of 14 studies were identified, representing data from 314 individuals with dyslexia and 317 typically developing control participants. The results indicate that, on average, individuals with dyslexia have worse procedural learning abilities than controls, as indexed by sequence learning on the SRT task. The average weighted standardized mean difference (the effect size) was found to be 0.449 (CI(95): .204, .693), and was significant (p < .001). However, moderate levels of heterogeneity were found between study-level effect sizes. Meta-regression analyses indicated that studies with older participants that used SRT tasks with second order conditional sequences, or with older participants that used sequences that were presented a large number of times, were associated with smaller effect sizes. These associations are discussed with respect to compensatory and delayed memory systems in dyslexia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3784964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Pergamon Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37849642013-10-01 Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies() Lum, Jarrad A.G. Ullman, Michael T. Conti-Ramsden, Gina Res Dev Disabil Review Article A number of studies have investigated procedural learning in dyslexia using serial reaction time (SRT) tasks. Overall, the results have been mixed, with evidence of both impaired and intact learning reported. We undertook a systematic search of studies that examined procedural learning using SRT tasks, and synthesized the data using meta-analysis. A total of 14 studies were identified, representing data from 314 individuals with dyslexia and 317 typically developing control participants. The results indicate that, on average, individuals with dyslexia have worse procedural learning abilities than controls, as indexed by sequence learning on the SRT task. The average weighted standardized mean difference (the effect size) was found to be 0.449 (CI(95): .204, .693), and was significant (p < .001). However, moderate levels of heterogeneity were found between study-level effect sizes. Meta-regression analyses indicated that studies with older participants that used SRT tasks with second order conditional sequences, or with older participants that used sequences that were presented a large number of times, were associated with smaller effect sizes. These associations are discussed with respect to compensatory and delayed memory systems in dyslexia. Pergamon Press 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3784964/ /pubmed/23920029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017 Text en © 2013 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Review Article Lum, Jarrad A.G. Ullman, Michael T. Conti-Ramsden, Gina Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies() |
title | Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies() |
title_full | Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies() |
title_fullStr | Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies() |
title_full_unstemmed | Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies() |
title_short | Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies() |
title_sort | procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies() |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3784964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23920029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lumjarradag procedurallearningisimpairedindyslexiaevidencefromametaanalysisofserialreactiontimestudies AT ullmanmichaelt procedurallearningisimpairedindyslexiaevidencefromametaanalysisofserialreactiontimestudies AT contiramsdengina procedurallearningisimpairedindyslexiaevidencefromametaanalysisofserialreactiontimestudies |