Cargando…

Retention Loss of Resin Based Fissure Sealants - a Valid Predictor for Clinical Outcome?

PURPOSE: The null-hypothesis that retention loss of resin fissure sealants predicts caries manifestation no more accurately than random values was tested. METHODS: Systematic reviews were checked and electronic databases searched for clinical trials. Trials reporting on the retention of resin sealan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Mickenautsch, Steffen, Yengopal, Veerasamy
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Bentham Open 2013
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3785037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24078856 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/18742106201305130001

Ejemplares similares

Caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent teeth: An update of systematic review evidence
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Validity of Sealant Retention as Surrogate for Caries Prevention – A Systematic Review
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention
por: MICKENAUTSCH, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Failure Rate of Direct High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomer Versus Hybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Posterior Permanent Teeth - a Systematic Review
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Allocation concealment appraisal of clinical therapy trials using the extended Composite Quality Score (CQS-2)—An empirically based update
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Direct Contra Naïve-Indirect Comparison of Clinical Failure Rates between High-Viscosity GIC and Conventional Amalgam Restorations: An Empirical Study
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Do Laboratory Results Concerning High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomers versus Amalgam for Tooth Restorations Indicate Similar Effect Direction and Magnitude than that of Controlled Clinical Trials? - A Meta-Epidemiological Study
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Retention of resin-based filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealants: A comparative clinical study
por: Reddy, V. Rajashekar, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant in children with special needs
por: Morales-Chávez, Mariana C., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restorations: An update of systematic review evidence
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The composite quality score for the appraisal of prospective controlled clinical therapy trials in systematic reviews and its limits
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Extension of the Composite Quality Score (CQS) as an appraisal tool for prospective, controlled clinical therapy trials–A systematic review of meta-epidemiological evidence
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Fissure sealant materials: Wear resistance of flowable composite resins
por: Asefi, Sohrab, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Evaluation of the effect of enamel preparation on retention rate of fissure sealant
por: Nahid, Askarizadeh, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant
por: Beresescu, Liana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Fluorinated Montmorillonite Composite Resin as a Dental Pit and Fissure Sealant
por: Li, Keng-Yuan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effectiveness of Fissure Sealant Retention and Caries Prevention with and without Primer and Bond
por: Nazar, Huda, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Ameloplasty is counterproductive in reducing microleakage around Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and Resin based fissure sealants
por: Khan, Tabinda Nawaz, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical Evaluation of the Retention of Different Pit and Fissure Sealants: A 1-Year Study
por: Kumaran, Parvathy
Publicado: (2013)

An In-Vitro Analysis of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Fissure Sealant vs. Conventional and GIC Fissure Sealants
por: Gorseta, Kristina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Microleakage of conventional light-cure resin-based fissure sealant and resin-modified glass ionomer sealant after application of a fluoride varnish on demineralized enamel
por: Germán-Cecilia, Concepción, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Glass ionomer ART sealant and fluoride-releasing resin sealant in fissure caries prevention – results from a randomized clinical trial
por: Liu, Bao Ying, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Resin-based Pit and Fissure Sealant and Self-adhering Flowable Composite: An In Vivo Study
por: Wadhwa, Saakshe, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Marginal Microleakage of Conventional Fissure Sealants and Self-Adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth
por: Rahimian-Imam, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Pit and fissure sealants penetration capacity and their correlation with fissure morphology
por: Muntean, Alexandrina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

SUGAR-FREE CHEWING GUM AND DENTAL CARIES – A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Prevention of Secondary Caries Using Resin-Based Pit and Fissure Sealants Containing Hydrated Calcium Silicate
por: Yang, Song-Yi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

One-year Clinical Evaluation of Retention Ability and Anticaries Effect of a Glass Ionomer-based and a Resin-based Fissure Sealant on Permanent First Molars: An In Vivo Study
por: Mathew, Sheeja R, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Performance of fissure sealants on fully erupted permanent molars with incipient carious lesions: A glass-ionomer-based versus a resin-based sealant
por: Jaafar, Nada, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review
por: Ramesh, Hasini, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of the Success Rate of Filled and Unfilled Resin-Based Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Bagheri, Elmira, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Clinical evaluation of giomer- and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent molars affected by molar-incisor hypomineralization: a randomized clinical trial
por: Özgür, Beste, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Fluoride: Is It Worth to be added in Pit and Fissure Sealants?
por: Prabhakar, AR, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Pit and Fissure Sealants—A Comprehensive Review
por: Cvikl, Barbara, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Effects of sealant, viscosity, and bonding agents on microleakage of fissure sealants: An in vitro study
por: Mehrabkhani, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Indirect evaluation of pit and fissure sealants: A 3D-based method validation
por: Moreira, Kelly, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Development of antibacterial composite resin containing chitosan/fluoride microparticles as pit and fissure sealant to prevent caries
por: Lai, Chun-Cheng, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems
por: Nahvi, Azam, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive
por: Aman, Nadia, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_pr89ar3mv7rk6pb1todso9l1hi