Cargando…

Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change

In a companion paper, we proposed that cognitive debiasing is a skill essential in developing sound clinical reasoning to mitigate the incidence of diagnostic failure. We reviewed the origins of cognitive biases and some proposed mechanisms for how debiasing processes might work. In this paper, we f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Croskerry, Pat, Singhal, Geeta, Mamede, Sílvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3786644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23996094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001713
_version_ 1782477766556385280
author Croskerry, Pat
Singhal, Geeta
Mamede, Sílvia
author_facet Croskerry, Pat
Singhal, Geeta
Mamede, Sílvia
author_sort Croskerry, Pat
collection PubMed
description In a companion paper, we proposed that cognitive debiasing is a skill essential in developing sound clinical reasoning to mitigate the incidence of diagnostic failure. We reviewed the origins of cognitive biases and some proposed mechanisms for how debiasing processes might work. In this paper, we first outline a general schema of how cognitive change occurs and the constraints that may apply. We review a variety of individual factors, many of them biases themselves, which may be impediments to change. We then examine the major strategies that have been developed in the social sciences and in medicine to achieve cognitive and affective debiasing, including the important concept of forcing functions. The abundance and rich variety of approaches that exist in the literature and in individual clinical domains illustrate the difficulties inherent in achieving cognitive change, and also the need for such interventions. Ongoing cognitive debiasing is arguably the most important feature of the critical thinker and the well-calibrated mind. We outline three groups of suggested interventions going forward: educational strategies, workplace strategies and forcing functions. We stress the importance of ambient and contextual influences on the quality of individual decision making and the need to address factors known to impair calibration of the decision maker. We also emphasise the importance of introducing these concepts and corollary development of training in critical thinking in the undergraduate level in medical education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3786644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37866442013-09-30 Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change Croskerry, Pat Singhal, Geeta Mamede, Sílvia BMJ Qual Saf Narrative Review In a companion paper, we proposed that cognitive debiasing is a skill essential in developing sound clinical reasoning to mitigate the incidence of diagnostic failure. We reviewed the origins of cognitive biases and some proposed mechanisms for how debiasing processes might work. In this paper, we first outline a general schema of how cognitive change occurs and the constraints that may apply. We review a variety of individual factors, many of them biases themselves, which may be impediments to change. We then examine the major strategies that have been developed in the social sciences and in medicine to achieve cognitive and affective debiasing, including the important concept of forcing functions. The abundance and rich variety of approaches that exist in the literature and in individual clinical domains illustrate the difficulties inherent in achieving cognitive change, and also the need for such interventions. Ongoing cognitive debiasing is arguably the most important feature of the critical thinker and the well-calibrated mind. We outline three groups of suggested interventions going forward: educational strategies, workplace strategies and forcing functions. We stress the importance of ambient and contextual influences on the quality of individual decision making and the need to address factors known to impair calibration of the decision maker. We also emphasise the importance of introducing these concepts and corollary development of training in critical thinking in the undergraduate level in medical education. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-10 2013-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3786644/ /pubmed/23996094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001713 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions this is an open access article distributed in accordance with the creative commons attribution non commercial (cc by-nc 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Narrative Review
Croskerry, Pat
Singhal, Geeta
Mamede, Sílvia
Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change
title Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change
title_full Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change
title_fullStr Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change
title_short Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change
title_sort cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change
topic Narrative Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3786644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23996094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001713
work_keys_str_mv AT croskerrypat cognitivedebiasing2impedimentstoandstrategiesforchange
AT singhalgeeta cognitivedebiasing2impedimentstoandstrategiesforchange
AT mamedesilvia cognitivedebiasing2impedimentstoandstrategiesforchange