Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the painDETECT Questionnaire: A Multicenter Observational Study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ-J). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The translation of the original PDQ into Japanese was achieved according to the published guidelines. Subsequently, a multicenter obs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsubayashi, Yoshitaka, Takeshita, Katsushi, Sumitani, Masahiko, Oshima, Yasushi, Tonosu, Juichi, Kato, So, Ohya, Junichi, Oichi, Takeshi, Okamoto, Naoki, Tanaka, Sakae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068013
_version_ 1782286128707010560
author Matsubayashi, Yoshitaka
Takeshita, Katsushi
Sumitani, Masahiko
Oshima, Yasushi
Tonosu, Juichi
Kato, So
Ohya, Junichi
Oichi, Takeshi
Okamoto, Naoki
Tanaka, Sakae
author_facet Matsubayashi, Yoshitaka
Takeshita, Katsushi
Sumitani, Masahiko
Oshima, Yasushi
Tonosu, Juichi
Kato, So
Ohya, Junichi
Oichi, Takeshi
Okamoto, Naoki
Tanaka, Sakae
author_sort Matsubayashi, Yoshitaka
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ-J). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The translation of the original PDQ into Japanese was achieved according to the published guidelines. Subsequently, a multicenter observational study was performed to evaluate the validity and reliability of PDQ-J, including 113 Japanese patients suffering from pain. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed that the main component of PDQ-J comprises two determinative factors, which account for 62% of the variance observed. Moreover, PDQ-J revealed statistically significant correlation with the intensity of pain (Numerical Rating Scale), Physical Component Score, and Mental Component Score of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The Cronbach alpha for the total score was 0.78 and for the main component was 0.80. In the analysis of test–retest method, the intraclass correlation coefficient between the two scores was 0.94. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the validity and reliability of PDQ-J. We encourage researchers and clinicians to use this tool for the assessment of patients who suffer suspected neuropathic pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3787034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37870342013-10-04 Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the painDETECT Questionnaire: A Multicenter Observational Study Matsubayashi, Yoshitaka Takeshita, Katsushi Sumitani, Masahiko Oshima, Yasushi Tonosu, Juichi Kato, So Ohya, Junichi Oichi, Takeshi Okamoto, Naoki Tanaka, Sakae PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ-J). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The translation of the original PDQ into Japanese was achieved according to the published guidelines. Subsequently, a multicenter observational study was performed to evaluate the validity and reliability of PDQ-J, including 113 Japanese patients suffering from pain. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed that the main component of PDQ-J comprises two determinative factors, which account for 62% of the variance observed. Moreover, PDQ-J revealed statistically significant correlation with the intensity of pain (Numerical Rating Scale), Physical Component Score, and Mental Component Score of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The Cronbach alpha for the total score was 0.78 and for the main component was 0.80. In the analysis of test–retest method, the intraclass correlation coefficient between the two scores was 0.94. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the validity and reliability of PDQ-J. We encourage researchers and clinicians to use this tool for the assessment of patients who suffer suspected neuropathic pain. Public Library of Science 2013-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3787034/ /pubmed/24098629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068013 Text en © 2013 Matsubayashi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matsubayashi, Yoshitaka
Takeshita, Katsushi
Sumitani, Masahiko
Oshima, Yasushi
Tonosu, Juichi
Kato, So
Ohya, Junichi
Oichi, Takeshi
Okamoto, Naoki
Tanaka, Sakae
Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the painDETECT Questionnaire: A Multicenter Observational Study
title Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the painDETECT Questionnaire: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_full Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the painDETECT Questionnaire: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the painDETECT Questionnaire: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the painDETECT Questionnaire: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_short Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the painDETECT Questionnaire: A Multicenter Observational Study
title_sort validity and reliability of the japanese version of the paindetect questionnaire: a multicenter observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068013
work_keys_str_mv AT matsubayashiyoshitaka validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT takeshitakatsushi validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT sumitanimasahiko validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT oshimayasushi validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT tonosujuichi validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT katoso validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT ohyajunichi validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT oichitakeshi validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT okamotonaoki validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT tanakasakae validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy