Cargando…
Internet-Based Attention Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Training towards Negative and Training Towards Positive Cues
Biases in attention processes are thought to play a crucial role in the aetiology and maintenance of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). The goal of the present study was to examine the efficacy of a programme intended to train attention towards positive cues and a programme intended to train attention t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071760 |
_version_ | 1782286135446208512 |
---|---|
author | Boettcher, Johanna Leek, Linda Matson, Lisa Holmes, Emily A. Browning, Michael MacLeod, Colin Andersson, Gerhard Carlbring, Per |
author_facet | Boettcher, Johanna Leek, Linda Matson, Lisa Holmes, Emily A. Browning, Michael MacLeod, Colin Andersson, Gerhard Carlbring, Per |
author_sort | Boettcher, Johanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biases in attention processes are thought to play a crucial role in the aetiology and maintenance of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). The goal of the present study was to examine the efficacy of a programme intended to train attention towards positive cues and a programme intended to train attention towards negative cues. In a randomised, controlled, double-blind design, the impact of these two training conditions on both selective attention and social anxiety were compared to that of a control training condition. A modified dot probe task was used, and delivered via the internet. A total of 129 individuals, diagnosed with SAD, were randomly assigned to one of these three conditions and took part in a 14-day programme with daily training/control sessions. Participants in all three groups did not on average display an attentional bias prior to the training. Critically, results on change in attention bias implied that significantly differential change in selective attention to threat was not detected in the three conditions. However, symptoms of social anxiety reduced significantly from pre- to follow-up-assessment in all three conditions (d(within) = 0.63–1.24), with the procedure intended to train attention towards threat cues producing, relative to the control condition, a significantly greater reduction of social fears. There were no significant differences in social anxiety outcome between the training condition intended to induce attentional bias towards positive cues and the control condition. To our knowledge, this is the first RCT where a condition intended to induce attention bias to negative cues yielded greater emotional benefits than a control condition. Intriguingly, changes in symptoms are unlikely to be by the mechanism of change in attention processes since there was no change detected in bias per se. Implications of this finding for future research on attention bias modification in social anxiety are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01463137 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3787061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37870612013-10-04 Internet-Based Attention Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Training towards Negative and Training Towards Positive Cues Boettcher, Johanna Leek, Linda Matson, Lisa Holmes, Emily A. Browning, Michael MacLeod, Colin Andersson, Gerhard Carlbring, Per PLoS One Research Article Biases in attention processes are thought to play a crucial role in the aetiology and maintenance of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). The goal of the present study was to examine the efficacy of a programme intended to train attention towards positive cues and a programme intended to train attention towards negative cues. In a randomised, controlled, double-blind design, the impact of these two training conditions on both selective attention and social anxiety were compared to that of a control training condition. A modified dot probe task was used, and delivered via the internet. A total of 129 individuals, diagnosed with SAD, were randomly assigned to one of these three conditions and took part in a 14-day programme with daily training/control sessions. Participants in all three groups did not on average display an attentional bias prior to the training. Critically, results on change in attention bias implied that significantly differential change in selective attention to threat was not detected in the three conditions. However, symptoms of social anxiety reduced significantly from pre- to follow-up-assessment in all three conditions (d(within) = 0.63–1.24), with the procedure intended to train attention towards threat cues producing, relative to the control condition, a significantly greater reduction of social fears. There were no significant differences in social anxiety outcome between the training condition intended to induce attentional bias towards positive cues and the control condition. To our knowledge, this is the first RCT where a condition intended to induce attention bias to negative cues yielded greater emotional benefits than a control condition. Intriguingly, changes in symptoms are unlikely to be by the mechanism of change in attention processes since there was no change detected in bias per se. Implications of this finding for future research on attention bias modification in social anxiety are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01463137 Public Library of Science 2013-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3787061/ /pubmed/24098630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071760 Text en © 2013 Boettcher et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Boettcher, Johanna Leek, Linda Matson, Lisa Holmes, Emily A. Browning, Michael MacLeod, Colin Andersson, Gerhard Carlbring, Per Internet-Based Attention Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Training towards Negative and Training Towards Positive Cues |
title | Internet-Based Attention Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Training towards Negative and Training Towards Positive Cues |
title_full | Internet-Based Attention Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Training towards Negative and Training Towards Positive Cues |
title_fullStr | Internet-Based Attention Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Training towards Negative and Training Towards Positive Cues |
title_full_unstemmed | Internet-Based Attention Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Training towards Negative and Training Towards Positive Cues |
title_short | Internet-Based Attention Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Training towards Negative and Training Towards Positive Cues |
title_sort | internet-based attention bias modification for social anxiety: a randomised controlled comparison of training towards negative and training towards positive cues |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071760 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boettcherjohanna internetbasedattentionbiasmodificationforsocialanxietyarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonoftrainingtowardsnegativeandtrainingtowardspositivecues AT leeklinda internetbasedattentionbiasmodificationforsocialanxietyarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonoftrainingtowardsnegativeandtrainingtowardspositivecues AT matsonlisa internetbasedattentionbiasmodificationforsocialanxietyarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonoftrainingtowardsnegativeandtrainingtowardspositivecues AT holmesemilya internetbasedattentionbiasmodificationforsocialanxietyarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonoftrainingtowardsnegativeandtrainingtowardspositivecues AT browningmichael internetbasedattentionbiasmodificationforsocialanxietyarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonoftrainingtowardsnegativeandtrainingtowardspositivecues AT macleodcolin internetbasedattentionbiasmodificationforsocialanxietyarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonoftrainingtowardsnegativeandtrainingtowardspositivecues AT anderssongerhard internetbasedattentionbiasmodificationforsocialanxietyarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonoftrainingtowardsnegativeandtrainingtowardspositivecues AT carlbringper internetbasedattentionbiasmodificationforsocialanxietyarandomisedcontrolledcomparisonoftrainingtowardsnegativeandtrainingtowardspositivecues |