Cargando…

Parity and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

BACKGROUND: Association between parity and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk has been investigated by several epidemiological studies but results are controversial, yet a comprehensive and quantitative assessment of this association has not been reported so far. METHODS: Relevant published studies of par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guan, Hong-Bo, Wu, Qi-Jun, Gong, Ting-Ting, Lin, Bei, Wang, Yong-Lai, Liu, Cai-Xia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075279
_version_ 1782286143070404608
author Guan, Hong-Bo
Wu, Qi-Jun
Gong, Ting-Ting
Lin, Bei
Wang, Yong-Lai
Liu, Cai-Xia
author_facet Guan, Hong-Bo
Wu, Qi-Jun
Gong, Ting-Ting
Lin, Bei
Wang, Yong-Lai
Liu, Cai-Xia
author_sort Guan, Hong-Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Association between parity and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk has been investigated by several epidemiological studies but results are controversial, yet a comprehensive and quantitative assessment of this association has not been reported so far. METHODS: Relevant published studies of parity and CRC were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases through end of April 2013. Two authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. Eleven prospective studies reported relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of CRC risk associated with parity. We pooled the RR from individual studies using fixed- or random-effects models and carried out heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. RESULTS: The summary RR for the ever parity vs. nulliparous was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88–1.02), with no heterogeneity (Q = 9.04, P = 0.443, I (2) = 0.5%). Likewise, no significant association was yielded for the highest vs. lowest parity number (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.89–1.17), with moderate heterogeneity (Q = 17.48, P = 0.094, I (2) = 37.1%). Dose-response analysis still indicated no effect of parity on CRC risk and the summary RR of per one livebirth was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96–1.02), with moderate of heterogeneity (Q = 16.50, P<0.021, I (2) = 57.6%). Similar results were observed among all the subgroup analyses. No evidence of publication bias and significant heterogeneity between subgroups were detected by meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSION: Results of this dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies found that there was little evidence of an association between parity and CRC risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3787107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37871072013-10-04 Parity and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies Guan, Hong-Bo Wu, Qi-Jun Gong, Ting-Ting Lin, Bei Wang, Yong-Lai Liu, Cai-Xia PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Association between parity and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk has been investigated by several epidemiological studies but results are controversial, yet a comprehensive and quantitative assessment of this association has not been reported so far. METHODS: Relevant published studies of parity and CRC were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases through end of April 2013. Two authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. Eleven prospective studies reported relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of CRC risk associated with parity. We pooled the RR from individual studies using fixed- or random-effects models and carried out heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. RESULTS: The summary RR for the ever parity vs. nulliparous was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88–1.02), with no heterogeneity (Q = 9.04, P = 0.443, I (2) = 0.5%). Likewise, no significant association was yielded for the highest vs. lowest parity number (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.89–1.17), with moderate heterogeneity (Q = 17.48, P = 0.094, I (2) = 37.1%). Dose-response analysis still indicated no effect of parity on CRC risk and the summary RR of per one livebirth was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96–1.02), with moderate of heterogeneity (Q = 16.50, P<0.021, I (2) = 57.6%). Similar results were observed among all the subgroup analyses. No evidence of publication bias and significant heterogeneity between subgroups were detected by meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSION: Results of this dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies found that there was little evidence of an association between parity and CRC risk. Public Library of Science 2013-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3787107/ /pubmed/24098689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075279 Text en © 2013 Guan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guan, Hong-Bo
Wu, Qi-Jun
Gong, Ting-Ting
Lin, Bei
Wang, Yong-Lai
Liu, Cai-Xia
Parity and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title Parity and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_full Parity and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_fullStr Parity and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_full_unstemmed Parity and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_short Parity and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
title_sort parity and risk of colorectal cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075279
work_keys_str_mv AT guanhongbo parityandriskofcolorectalcanceradoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT wuqijun parityandriskofcolorectalcanceradoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT gongtingting parityandriskofcolorectalcanceradoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT linbei parityandriskofcolorectalcanceradoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT wangyonglai parityandriskofcolorectalcanceradoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies
AT liucaixia parityandriskofcolorectalcanceradoseresponsemetaanalysisofprospectivestudies