Cargando…
A Tumor initiating cell-enriched prognostic signature for HER2(+):ERα(−) breast cancer; rationale, new features, controversies and future directions
The high intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity of many types of cancers, including breast cancer (BC), poses great challenge to development of subtype-specific prognosis. In BC, the classification of tumors as either ERα(+) (Luminal A and Luminal B), HER2(+) (ERα(+) or ERα(−)) or triple-negative (TNB...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23945331 |
_version_ | 1782286149248614400 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Jeff C. Egan, Sean E. Zacksenhaus, Eldad |
author_facet | Liu, Jeff C. Egan, Sean E. Zacksenhaus, Eldad |
author_sort | Liu, Jeff C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The high intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity of many types of cancers, including breast cancer (BC), poses great challenge to development of subtype-specific prognosis. In BC, the classification of tumors as either ERα(+) (Luminal A and Luminal B), HER2(+) (ERα(+) or ERα(−)) or triple-negative (TNBC)(Basal-like, claudin-low) guides both prognostication and therapy. Indeed, prognostic signatures for ERα(+) BC are being incorporated into clinical use. However, these signatures distinguish between luminal A (low risk) and Luminal B (high risk) BC; signatures that identify low/high risk patients with luminal B BC are yet to be developed. Likewise, no signature is in clinical use for HER2(+) or TNBC. The major obstacles to development of robust signatures stem from diversity of BC, clonal evolution and heterogeneity within each subtype. We have recently generated a prognostic signature for HER2(+):ERα(−) BC based on the identification of genes that were differentially expressed in a tumor-initiating cell (TIC)-enriched fraction versus non-TIC fraction from a mouse model of HER2(+) BC (MMTV-Hers/Neu). Here we describe the rationale behind development of this prognosticator, and present new features of the signature, including elevated PI3K pathway activity and low TNFalpha and IFNgamma signaling in high-risk tumors. In addition, we address controversies in the field such as whether random gene expression signatures significantly associate with cancer outcome. Finally, we suggest a guideline for development of prognostic signatures and discuss future directions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3787160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37871602013-10-01 A Tumor initiating cell-enriched prognostic signature for HER2(+):ERα(−) breast cancer; rationale, new features, controversies and future directions Liu, Jeff C. Egan, Sean E. Zacksenhaus, Eldad Oncotarget Research Perspective The high intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity of many types of cancers, including breast cancer (BC), poses great challenge to development of subtype-specific prognosis. In BC, the classification of tumors as either ERα(+) (Luminal A and Luminal B), HER2(+) (ERα(+) or ERα(−)) or triple-negative (TNBC)(Basal-like, claudin-low) guides both prognostication and therapy. Indeed, prognostic signatures for ERα(+) BC are being incorporated into clinical use. However, these signatures distinguish between luminal A (low risk) and Luminal B (high risk) BC; signatures that identify low/high risk patients with luminal B BC are yet to be developed. Likewise, no signature is in clinical use for HER2(+) or TNBC. The major obstacles to development of robust signatures stem from diversity of BC, clonal evolution and heterogeneity within each subtype. We have recently generated a prognostic signature for HER2(+):ERα(−) BC based on the identification of genes that were differentially expressed in a tumor-initiating cell (TIC)-enriched fraction versus non-TIC fraction from a mouse model of HER2(+) BC (MMTV-Hers/Neu). Here we describe the rationale behind development of this prognosticator, and present new features of the signature, including elevated PI3K pathway activity and low TNFalpha and IFNgamma signaling in high-risk tumors. In addition, we address controversies in the field such as whether random gene expression signatures significantly associate with cancer outcome. Finally, we suggest a guideline for development of prognostic signatures and discuss future directions. Impact Journals LLC 2013-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3787160/ /pubmed/23945331 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Liu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited |
spellingShingle | Research Perspective Liu, Jeff C. Egan, Sean E. Zacksenhaus, Eldad A Tumor initiating cell-enriched prognostic signature for HER2(+):ERα(−) breast cancer; rationale, new features, controversies and future directions |
title | A Tumor initiating cell-enriched prognostic signature for HER2(+):ERα(−) breast cancer; rationale, new features, controversies and future directions |
title_full | A Tumor initiating cell-enriched prognostic signature for HER2(+):ERα(−) breast cancer; rationale, new features, controversies and future directions |
title_fullStr | A Tumor initiating cell-enriched prognostic signature for HER2(+):ERα(−) breast cancer; rationale, new features, controversies and future directions |
title_full_unstemmed | A Tumor initiating cell-enriched prognostic signature for HER2(+):ERα(−) breast cancer; rationale, new features, controversies and future directions |
title_short | A Tumor initiating cell-enriched prognostic signature for HER2(+):ERα(−) breast cancer; rationale, new features, controversies and future directions |
title_sort | tumor initiating cell-enriched prognostic signature for her2(+):erα(−) breast cancer; rationale, new features, controversies and future directions |
topic | Research Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23945331 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liujeffc atumorinitiatingcellenrichedprognosticsignatureforher2erabreastcancerrationalenewfeaturescontroversiesandfuturedirections AT eganseane atumorinitiatingcellenrichedprognosticsignatureforher2erabreastcancerrationalenewfeaturescontroversiesandfuturedirections AT zacksenhauseldad atumorinitiatingcellenrichedprognosticsignatureforher2erabreastcancerrationalenewfeaturescontroversiesandfuturedirections AT liujeffc tumorinitiatingcellenrichedprognosticsignatureforher2erabreastcancerrationalenewfeaturescontroversiesandfuturedirections AT eganseane tumorinitiatingcellenrichedprognosticsignatureforher2erabreastcancerrationalenewfeaturescontroversiesandfuturedirections AT zacksenhauseldad tumorinitiatingcellenrichedprognosticsignatureforher2erabreastcancerrationalenewfeaturescontroversiesandfuturedirections |