Cargando…
Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue
Several immobilized enzyme-based electrochemical biosensors for glutamate detection have been developed over the last decade. In this review, we compare first and second generation sensors. Structures, working mechanisms, interference prevention, in vitro detection characteristics and in vivo perfor...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27873904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8116860 |
_version_ | 1782286171355742208 |
---|---|
author | Qin, Si van der Zeyden, Miranda Oldenziel, Weite H. Cremers, Thomas I.F.H. Westerink, Ben H.C. |
author_facet | Qin, Si van der Zeyden, Miranda Oldenziel, Weite H. Cremers, Thomas I.F.H. Westerink, Ben H.C. |
author_sort | Qin, Si |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several immobilized enzyme-based electrochemical biosensors for glutamate detection have been developed over the last decade. In this review, we compare first and second generation sensors. Structures, working mechanisms, interference prevention, in vitro detection characteristics and in vivo performance are summarized here for those sensors that have successfully detected brain glutamate in vivo. In brief, first generation sensors have a simpler structure and are faster in glutamate detection. They also show a better sensitivity to glutamate during calibration in vitro. For second generation sensors, besides their less precise detection, their fabrication is difficult to reproduce, even with a semi-automatic dip-coater. Both generations of sensors can detect glutamate levels in vivo, but the reported basal levels are different. In general, second generation sensors detect higher basal levels of glutamate compared with the results obtained from first generation sensors. However, whether the detected glutamate is indeed from synaptic sources is an issue that needs further attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3787420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37874202013-10-17 Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue Qin, Si van der Zeyden, Miranda Oldenziel, Weite H. Cremers, Thomas I.F.H. Westerink, Ben H.C. Sensors (Basel) Review Several immobilized enzyme-based electrochemical biosensors for glutamate detection have been developed over the last decade. In this review, we compare first and second generation sensors. Structures, working mechanisms, interference prevention, in vitro detection characteristics and in vivo performance are summarized here for those sensors that have successfully detected brain glutamate in vivo. In brief, first generation sensors have a simpler structure and are faster in glutamate detection. They also show a better sensitivity to glutamate during calibration in vitro. For second generation sensors, besides their less precise detection, their fabrication is difficult to reproduce, even with a semi-automatic dip-coater. Both generations of sensors can detect glutamate levels in vivo, but the reported basal levels are different. In general, second generation sensors detect higher basal levels of glutamate compared with the results obtained from first generation sensors. However, whether the detected glutamate is indeed from synaptic sources is an issue that needs further attention. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2008-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3787420/ /pubmed/27873904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8116860 Text en © 2008 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Qin, Si van der Zeyden, Miranda Oldenziel, Weite H. Cremers, Thomas I.F.H. Westerink, Ben H.C. Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue |
title | Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue |
title_full | Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue |
title_fullStr | Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue |
title_full_unstemmed | Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue |
title_short | Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue |
title_sort | microsensors for in vivo measurement of glutamate in brain tissue |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27873904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8116860 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qinsi microsensorsforinvivomeasurementofglutamateinbraintissue AT vanderzeydenmiranda microsensorsforinvivomeasurementofglutamateinbraintissue AT oldenzielweiteh microsensorsforinvivomeasurementofglutamateinbraintissue AT cremersthomasifh microsensorsforinvivomeasurementofglutamateinbraintissue AT westerinkbenhc microsensorsforinvivomeasurementofglutamateinbraintissue |