Cargando…

Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue

Several immobilized enzyme-based electrochemical biosensors for glutamate detection have been developed over the last decade. In this review, we compare first and second generation sensors. Structures, working mechanisms, interference prevention, in vitro detection characteristics and in vivo perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Si, van der Zeyden, Miranda, Oldenziel, Weite H., Cremers, Thomas I.F.H., Westerink, Ben H.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27873904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8116860
_version_ 1782286171355742208
author Qin, Si
van der Zeyden, Miranda
Oldenziel, Weite H.
Cremers, Thomas I.F.H.
Westerink, Ben H.C.
author_facet Qin, Si
van der Zeyden, Miranda
Oldenziel, Weite H.
Cremers, Thomas I.F.H.
Westerink, Ben H.C.
author_sort Qin, Si
collection PubMed
description Several immobilized enzyme-based electrochemical biosensors for glutamate detection have been developed over the last decade. In this review, we compare first and second generation sensors. Structures, working mechanisms, interference prevention, in vitro detection characteristics and in vivo performance are summarized here for those sensors that have successfully detected brain glutamate in vivo. In brief, first generation sensors have a simpler structure and are faster in glutamate detection. They also show a better sensitivity to glutamate during calibration in vitro. For second generation sensors, besides their less precise detection, their fabrication is difficult to reproduce, even with a semi-automatic dip-coater. Both generations of sensors can detect glutamate levels in vivo, but the reported basal levels are different. In general, second generation sensors detect higher basal levels of glutamate compared with the results obtained from first generation sensors. However, whether the detected glutamate is indeed from synaptic sources is an issue that needs further attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3787420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37874202013-10-17 Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue Qin, Si van der Zeyden, Miranda Oldenziel, Weite H. Cremers, Thomas I.F.H. Westerink, Ben H.C. Sensors (Basel) Review Several immobilized enzyme-based electrochemical biosensors for glutamate detection have been developed over the last decade. In this review, we compare first and second generation sensors. Structures, working mechanisms, interference prevention, in vitro detection characteristics and in vivo performance are summarized here for those sensors that have successfully detected brain glutamate in vivo. In brief, first generation sensors have a simpler structure and are faster in glutamate detection. They also show a better sensitivity to glutamate during calibration in vitro. For second generation sensors, besides their less precise detection, their fabrication is difficult to reproduce, even with a semi-automatic dip-coater. Both generations of sensors can detect glutamate levels in vivo, but the reported basal levels are different. In general, second generation sensors detect higher basal levels of glutamate compared with the results obtained from first generation sensors. However, whether the detected glutamate is indeed from synaptic sources is an issue that needs further attention. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2008-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3787420/ /pubmed/27873904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8116860 Text en © 2008 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Qin, Si
van der Zeyden, Miranda
Oldenziel, Weite H.
Cremers, Thomas I.F.H.
Westerink, Ben H.C.
Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue
title Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue
title_full Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue
title_fullStr Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue
title_full_unstemmed Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue
title_short Microsensors for in vivo Measurement of Glutamate in Brain Tissue
title_sort microsensors for in vivo measurement of glutamate in brain tissue
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27873904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8116860
work_keys_str_mv AT qinsi microsensorsforinvivomeasurementofglutamateinbraintissue
AT vanderzeydenmiranda microsensorsforinvivomeasurementofglutamateinbraintissue
AT oldenzielweiteh microsensorsforinvivomeasurementofglutamateinbraintissue
AT cremersthomasifh microsensorsforinvivomeasurementofglutamateinbraintissue
AT westerinkbenhc microsensorsforinvivomeasurementofglutamateinbraintissue