Cargando…
Can Commercial Digital Cameras Be Used as Multispectral Sensors? A Crop Monitoring Test
The use of consumer digital cameras or webcams to characterize and monitor different features has become prevalent in various domains, especially in environmental applications. Despite some promising results, such digital camera systems generally suffer from signal aberrations due to the on-board im...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27873930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8117300 |
_version_ | 1782286177502494720 |
---|---|
author | Lebourgeois, Valentine Bégué, Agnès Labbé, Sylvain Mallavan, Benjamin Prévot, Laurent Roux, Bruno |
author_facet | Lebourgeois, Valentine Bégué, Agnès Labbé, Sylvain Mallavan, Benjamin Prévot, Laurent Roux, Bruno |
author_sort | Lebourgeois, Valentine |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of consumer digital cameras or webcams to characterize and monitor different features has become prevalent in various domains, especially in environmental applications. Despite some promising results, such digital camera systems generally suffer from signal aberrations due to the on-board image processing systems and thus offer limited quantitative data acquisition capability. The objective of this study was to test a series of radiometric corrections having the potential to reduce radiometric distortions linked to camera optics and environmental conditions, and to quantify the effects of these corrections on our ability to monitor crop variables. In 2007, we conducted a five-month experiment on sugarcane trial plots using original RGB and modified RGB (Red-Edge and NIR) cameras fitted onto a light aircraft. The camera settings were kept unchanged throughout the acquisition period and the images were recorded in JPEG and RAW formats. These images were corrected to eliminate the vignetting effect, and normalized between acquisition dates. Our results suggest that 1) the use of unprocessed image data did not improve the results of image analyses; 2) vignetting had a significant effect, especially for the modified camera, and 3) normalized vegetation indices calculated with vignetting-corrected images were sufficient to correct for scene illumination conditions. These results are discussed in the light of the experimental protocol and recommendations are made for the use of these versatile systems for quantitative remote sensing of terrestrial surfaces. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3787446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37874462013-10-17 Can Commercial Digital Cameras Be Used as Multispectral Sensors? A Crop Monitoring Test Lebourgeois, Valentine Bégué, Agnès Labbé, Sylvain Mallavan, Benjamin Prévot, Laurent Roux, Bruno Sensors (Basel) Article The use of consumer digital cameras or webcams to characterize and monitor different features has become prevalent in various domains, especially in environmental applications. Despite some promising results, such digital camera systems generally suffer from signal aberrations due to the on-board image processing systems and thus offer limited quantitative data acquisition capability. The objective of this study was to test a series of radiometric corrections having the potential to reduce radiometric distortions linked to camera optics and environmental conditions, and to quantify the effects of these corrections on our ability to monitor crop variables. In 2007, we conducted a five-month experiment on sugarcane trial plots using original RGB and modified RGB (Red-Edge and NIR) cameras fitted onto a light aircraft. The camera settings were kept unchanged throughout the acquisition period and the images were recorded in JPEG and RAW formats. These images were corrected to eliminate the vignetting effect, and normalized between acquisition dates. Our results suggest that 1) the use of unprocessed image data did not improve the results of image analyses; 2) vignetting had a significant effect, especially for the modified camera, and 3) normalized vegetation indices calculated with vignetting-corrected images were sufficient to correct for scene illumination conditions. These results are discussed in the light of the experimental protocol and recommendations are made for the use of these versatile systems for quantitative remote sensing of terrestrial surfaces. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2008-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3787446/ /pubmed/27873930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8117300 Text en © 2008 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lebourgeois, Valentine Bégué, Agnès Labbé, Sylvain Mallavan, Benjamin Prévot, Laurent Roux, Bruno Can Commercial Digital Cameras Be Used as Multispectral Sensors? A Crop Monitoring Test |
title | Can Commercial Digital Cameras Be Used as Multispectral Sensors? A Crop Monitoring Test |
title_full | Can Commercial Digital Cameras Be Used as Multispectral Sensors? A Crop Monitoring Test |
title_fullStr | Can Commercial Digital Cameras Be Used as Multispectral Sensors? A Crop Monitoring Test |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Commercial Digital Cameras Be Used as Multispectral Sensors? A Crop Monitoring Test |
title_short | Can Commercial Digital Cameras Be Used as Multispectral Sensors? A Crop Monitoring Test |
title_sort | can commercial digital cameras be used as multispectral sensors? a crop monitoring test |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27873930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8117300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lebourgeoisvalentine cancommercialdigitalcamerasbeusedasmultispectralsensorsacropmonitoringtest AT begueagnes cancommercialdigitalcamerasbeusedasmultispectralsensorsacropmonitoringtest AT labbesylvain cancommercialdigitalcamerasbeusedasmultispectralsensorsacropmonitoringtest AT mallavanbenjamin cancommercialdigitalcamerasbeusedasmultispectralsensorsacropmonitoringtest AT prevotlaurent cancommercialdigitalcamerasbeusedasmultispectralsensorsacropmonitoringtest AT rouxbruno cancommercialdigitalcamerasbeusedasmultispectralsensorsacropmonitoringtest |