Cargando…
Measuring a caring culture in hospitals: a systematic review of instruments
OBJECTIVE: To identify instruments or components of instruments that aim to measure aspects of a caring culture-shared beliefs, norms and values that direct professionals and managers to act caring in hospitals, and to evaluate their psychometric properties. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES:...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24065697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003416 |
_version_ | 1782286181240668160 |
---|---|
author | Hesselink, G Kuis, E Pijnenburg, M Wollersheim, H |
author_facet | Hesselink, G Kuis, E Pijnenburg, M Wollersheim, H |
author_sort | Hesselink, G |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To identify instruments or components of instruments that aim to measure aspects of a caring culture-shared beliefs, norms and values that direct professionals and managers to act caring in hospitals, and to evaluate their psychometric properties. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychInfo, Web of Science and the International bibliography of the Social Sciences. STUDY SELECTION: Peer-reviewed articles describing (components of) instruments measuring aspects of a caring culture in a hospital setting. Studies had to report psychometric data regarding the reliability or validity of the instrument. Potentially useful instruments that were identified after the title and abstract scan were assessed on relevance by an expert panel (n=12) using the RAND-modified Delphi procedure. RESULTS: Of the 6399 references identified, 75 were examined in detail. 7 studies each covering a unique instrument met our inclusion criteria. On average, 24% of the instrument's items were considered relevant for measuring aspects of the hospital's caring culture. Studies showed moderate-to-high validity and reliability scores. Validity was addressed for 6 of the 7 instruments. Face, content (90%) and construct (60%) validity were the most frequently reported psychometric properties described. One study (14%) reported discriminant validity of the instrument. Reliability data were available for all of the instruments. Internal consistency was the most frequently reported psychometric property for the instruments and demonstrated by: a Cronbach's α coefficient (80%), subscale intercorrelations (60%), and item–total correlations (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The ultimate standard for measuring a caring culture in hospitals does not exist. Existing instruments provide partial coverage and lack information on discriminant validity, responsiveness and feasibility. Characteristics of the instruments included in this review could provide useful input for the design of a reliable and valid instrument for measuring a caring culture in hospitals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3787470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37874702013-10-15 Measuring a caring culture in hospitals: a systematic review of instruments Hesselink, G Kuis, E Pijnenburg, M Wollersheim, H BMJ Open Ethics OBJECTIVE: To identify instruments or components of instruments that aim to measure aspects of a caring culture-shared beliefs, norms and values that direct professionals and managers to act caring in hospitals, and to evaluate their psychometric properties. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychInfo, Web of Science and the International bibliography of the Social Sciences. STUDY SELECTION: Peer-reviewed articles describing (components of) instruments measuring aspects of a caring culture in a hospital setting. Studies had to report psychometric data regarding the reliability or validity of the instrument. Potentially useful instruments that were identified after the title and abstract scan were assessed on relevance by an expert panel (n=12) using the RAND-modified Delphi procedure. RESULTS: Of the 6399 references identified, 75 were examined in detail. 7 studies each covering a unique instrument met our inclusion criteria. On average, 24% of the instrument's items were considered relevant for measuring aspects of the hospital's caring culture. Studies showed moderate-to-high validity and reliability scores. Validity was addressed for 6 of the 7 instruments. Face, content (90%) and construct (60%) validity were the most frequently reported psychometric properties described. One study (14%) reported discriminant validity of the instrument. Reliability data were available for all of the instruments. Internal consistency was the most frequently reported psychometric property for the instruments and demonstrated by: a Cronbach's α coefficient (80%), subscale intercorrelations (60%), and item–total correlations (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The ultimate standard for measuring a caring culture in hospitals does not exist. Existing instruments provide partial coverage and lack information on discriminant validity, responsiveness and feasibility. Characteristics of the instruments included in this review could provide useful input for the design of a reliable and valid instrument for measuring a caring culture in hospitals. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3787470/ /pubmed/24065697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003416 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Ethics Hesselink, G Kuis, E Pijnenburg, M Wollersheim, H Measuring a caring culture in hospitals: a systematic review of instruments |
title | Measuring a caring culture in hospitals: a systematic review of instruments |
title_full | Measuring a caring culture in hospitals: a systematic review of instruments |
title_fullStr | Measuring a caring culture in hospitals: a systematic review of instruments |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring a caring culture in hospitals: a systematic review of instruments |
title_short | Measuring a caring culture in hospitals: a systematic review of instruments |
title_sort | measuring a caring culture in hospitals: a systematic review of instruments |
topic | Ethics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24065697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003416 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hesselinkg measuringacaringcultureinhospitalsasystematicreviewofinstruments AT kuise measuringacaringcultureinhospitalsasystematicreviewofinstruments AT pijnenburgm measuringacaringcultureinhospitalsasystematicreviewofinstruments AT wollersheimh measuringacaringcultureinhospitalsasystematicreviewofinstruments |