Cargando…

Two Live Births following Robotic-Assisted Abdominal Cerclage in Nonpregnant Women

Introduction. To report the robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage performed in two nonpregnant women and the success of live birth outcomes. Presentation of Cases. A 36-year-old woman with a complaint of recurrent second trimester pregnancy losses and a 35-year-old patient with a complaint of preterm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Göçmen, Ahmet, Şanlıkan, Fatih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/256972
_version_ 1782286212479844352
author Göçmen, Ahmet
Şanlıkan, Fatih
author_facet Göçmen, Ahmet
Şanlıkan, Fatih
author_sort Göçmen, Ahmet
collection PubMed
description Introduction. To report the robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage performed in two nonpregnant women and the success of live birth outcomes. Presentation of Cases. A 36-year-old woman with a complaint of recurrent second trimester pregnancy losses and a 35-year-old patient with a complaint of preterm deliveries and cervical insufficiency underwent robotic assisted abdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage placement in nonpregnant period. The two patients had spontaneous pregnancy after the robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage and delivered healthy infants. Discussion. The limitations of traditional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage have been accomplished with robotic surgery advantages especially intuitive movements and increased range of motion. There are only a few studies in the literature including robotic assisted abdominal cerclage in nonpregnant women, and only five successful live birth outcomes were reported. In this paper, we reported the sixth and seventh cases of achieved live pregnancy after robotic assisted abdominal cerclage in the literature. Conclusion. Robotic assisted abdominal cerclage is a good alternative surgical method with successful pregnancy outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3787646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37876462013-10-09 Two Live Births following Robotic-Assisted Abdominal Cerclage in Nonpregnant Women Göçmen, Ahmet Şanlıkan, Fatih Case Rep Obstet Gynecol Case Report Introduction. To report the robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage performed in two nonpregnant women and the success of live birth outcomes. Presentation of Cases. A 36-year-old woman with a complaint of recurrent second trimester pregnancy losses and a 35-year-old patient with a complaint of preterm deliveries and cervical insufficiency underwent robotic assisted abdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage placement in nonpregnant period. The two patients had spontaneous pregnancy after the robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage and delivered healthy infants. Discussion. The limitations of traditional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage have been accomplished with robotic surgery advantages especially intuitive movements and increased range of motion. There are only a few studies in the literature including robotic assisted abdominal cerclage in nonpregnant women, and only five successful live birth outcomes were reported. In this paper, we reported the sixth and seventh cases of achieved live pregnancy after robotic assisted abdominal cerclage in the literature. Conclusion. Robotic assisted abdominal cerclage is a good alternative surgical method with successful pregnancy outcomes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3787646/ /pubmed/24109534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/256972 Text en Copyright © 2013 A. Göçmen and F. Şanlıkan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Göçmen, Ahmet
Şanlıkan, Fatih
Two Live Births following Robotic-Assisted Abdominal Cerclage in Nonpregnant Women
title Two Live Births following Robotic-Assisted Abdominal Cerclage in Nonpregnant Women
title_full Two Live Births following Robotic-Assisted Abdominal Cerclage in Nonpregnant Women
title_fullStr Two Live Births following Robotic-Assisted Abdominal Cerclage in Nonpregnant Women
title_full_unstemmed Two Live Births following Robotic-Assisted Abdominal Cerclage in Nonpregnant Women
title_short Two Live Births following Robotic-Assisted Abdominal Cerclage in Nonpregnant Women
title_sort two live births following robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage in nonpregnant women
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/256972
work_keys_str_mv AT gocmenahmet twolivebirthsfollowingroboticassistedabdominalcerclageinnonpregnantwomen
AT sanlıkanfatih twolivebirthsfollowingroboticassistedabdominalcerclageinnonpregnantwomen