Cargando…
Validation and extension of the reward-mountain model
The reward-mountain model relates the vigor of reward seeking to the strength and cost of reward. Application of this model provides information about the stage of processing at which manipulations such as drug administration, lesions, deprivation states, and optogenetic interventions act to alter r...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00125 |
_version_ | 1782286215134838784 |
---|---|
author | Breton, Yannick-André Mullett, Ada Conover, Kent Shizgal, Peter |
author_facet | Breton, Yannick-André Mullett, Ada Conover, Kent Shizgal, Peter |
author_sort | Breton, Yannick-André |
collection | PubMed |
description | The reward-mountain model relates the vigor of reward seeking to the strength and cost of reward. Application of this model provides information about the stage of processing at which manipulations such as drug administration, lesions, deprivation states, and optogenetic interventions act to alter reward seeking. The model has been updated by incorporation of new information about frequency following in the directly stimulated neurons responsible for brain stimulation reward and about the function that maps objective opportunity costs into subjective ones. The behavioral methods for applying the model have been updated and improved as well. To assess the impact of these changes, two related predictions of the model that were supported by earlier work have been retested: (1) altering the duration of rewarding brain stimulation should change the pulse frequency required to produce a reward of half-maximal intensity, and (2) this manipulation should not change the opportunity cost at which half-maximal performance is directed at earning a maximally intense reward. Prediction 1 was supported in all six subjects, but prediction 2 was supported in only three. The latter finding is interpreted to reflect recruitment, at some stimulation sites, of a heterogeneous reward substrate comprising dual, parallel circuits that integrate the stimulation-induced neural signals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3787655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37876552013-10-04 Validation and extension of the reward-mountain model Breton, Yannick-André Mullett, Ada Conover, Kent Shizgal, Peter Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience The reward-mountain model relates the vigor of reward seeking to the strength and cost of reward. Application of this model provides information about the stage of processing at which manipulations such as drug administration, lesions, deprivation states, and optogenetic interventions act to alter reward seeking. The model has been updated by incorporation of new information about frequency following in the directly stimulated neurons responsible for brain stimulation reward and about the function that maps objective opportunity costs into subjective ones. The behavioral methods for applying the model have been updated and improved as well. To assess the impact of these changes, two related predictions of the model that were supported by earlier work have been retested: (1) altering the duration of rewarding brain stimulation should change the pulse frequency required to produce a reward of half-maximal intensity, and (2) this manipulation should not change the opportunity cost at which half-maximal performance is directed at earning a maximally intense reward. Prediction 1 was supported in all six subjects, but prediction 2 was supported in only three. The latter finding is interpreted to reflect recruitment, at some stimulation sites, of a heterogeneous reward substrate comprising dual, parallel circuits that integrate the stimulation-induced neural signals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3787655/ /pubmed/24098275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00125 Text en Copyright © 2013 Breton, Mullett, Conover and Shizgal. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Breton, Yannick-André Mullett, Ada Conover, Kent Shizgal, Peter Validation and extension of the reward-mountain model |
title | Validation and extension of the reward-mountain model |
title_full | Validation and extension of the reward-mountain model |
title_fullStr | Validation and extension of the reward-mountain model |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation and extension of the reward-mountain model |
title_short | Validation and extension of the reward-mountain model |
title_sort | validation and extension of the reward-mountain model |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bretonyannickandre validationandextensionoftherewardmountainmodel AT mullettada validationandextensionoftherewardmountainmodel AT conoverkent validationandextensionoftherewardmountainmodel AT shizgalpeter validationandextensionoftherewardmountainmodel |