Cargando…

Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies()

We present, to our knowledge, the first quantitative analysis of functional site diversity in homologous domain superfamilies. Different types of functional sites are considered separately. Our results show that most diverse superfamilies are very plastic in terms of the spatial location of their fu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dessailly, Benoit H., Dawson, Natalie L., Mizuguchi, Kenji, Orengo, Christine A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Pub. Co 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23499848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.02.042
_version_ 1782286226575851520
author Dessailly, Benoit H.
Dawson, Natalie L.
Mizuguchi, Kenji
Orengo, Christine A.
author_facet Dessailly, Benoit H.
Dawson, Natalie L.
Mizuguchi, Kenji
Orengo, Christine A.
author_sort Dessailly, Benoit H.
collection PubMed
description We present, to our knowledge, the first quantitative analysis of functional site diversity in homologous domain superfamilies. Different types of functional sites are considered separately. Our results show that most diverse superfamilies are very plastic in terms of the spatial location of their functional sites. This is especially true for protein–protein interfaces. In contrast, we confirm that catalytic sites typically occupy only a very small number of topological locations. Small-ligand binding sites are more diverse than expected, although in a more limited manner than protein–protein interfaces. In spite of the observed diversity, our results also confirm the previously reported preferential location of functional sites. We identify a subset of homologous domain superfamilies where diversity is particularly extreme, and discuss possible reasons for such plasticity, i.e. structural diversity. Our results do not contradict previous reports of preferential co-location of sites among homologues, but rather point at the importance of not ignoring other sites, especially in large and diverse superfamilies. Data on sites exploited by different relatives, within each well annotated domain superfamily, has been made accessible from the CATH website in order to highlight versatile superfamilies or superfamilies with highly preferential sites. This information is valuable for system biology and knowledge of any constraints on protein interactions could help in understanding the dynamic control of networks in which these proteins participate. The novelty of our work lies in the comprehensive nature of the analysis – we have used a significantly larger dataset than previous studies – and the fact that in many superfamilies we show that different parts of the domain surface are exploited by different relatives for ligand/protein interactions, particularly in superfamilies which are diverse in sequence and structure, an observation not previously reported on such a large scale. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: The emerging dynamic view of proteins: Protein plasticity in allostery, evolution and self-assembly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3787744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier Pub. Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37877442013-10-03 Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies() Dessailly, Benoit H. Dawson, Natalie L. Mizuguchi, Kenji Orengo, Christine A. Biochim Biophys Acta Article We present, to our knowledge, the first quantitative analysis of functional site diversity in homologous domain superfamilies. Different types of functional sites are considered separately. Our results show that most diverse superfamilies are very plastic in terms of the spatial location of their functional sites. This is especially true for protein–protein interfaces. In contrast, we confirm that catalytic sites typically occupy only a very small number of topological locations. Small-ligand binding sites are more diverse than expected, although in a more limited manner than protein–protein interfaces. In spite of the observed diversity, our results also confirm the previously reported preferential location of functional sites. We identify a subset of homologous domain superfamilies where diversity is particularly extreme, and discuss possible reasons for such plasticity, i.e. structural diversity. Our results do not contradict previous reports of preferential co-location of sites among homologues, but rather point at the importance of not ignoring other sites, especially in large and diverse superfamilies. Data on sites exploited by different relatives, within each well annotated domain superfamily, has been made accessible from the CATH website in order to highlight versatile superfamilies or superfamilies with highly preferential sites. This information is valuable for system biology and knowledge of any constraints on protein interactions could help in understanding the dynamic control of networks in which these proteins participate. The novelty of our work lies in the comprehensive nature of the analysis – we have used a significantly larger dataset than previous studies – and the fact that in many superfamilies we show that different parts of the domain surface are exploited by different relatives for ligand/protein interactions, particularly in superfamilies which are diverse in sequence and structure, an observation not previously reported on such a large scale. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: The emerging dynamic view of proteins: Protein plasticity in allostery, evolution and self-assembly. Elsevier Pub. Co 2013-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3787744/ /pubmed/23499848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.02.042 Text en © 2013 Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Dessailly, Benoit H.
Dawson, Natalie L.
Mizuguchi, Kenji
Orengo, Christine A.
Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies()
title Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies()
title_full Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies()
title_fullStr Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies()
title_full_unstemmed Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies()
title_short Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies()
title_sort functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23499848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.02.042
work_keys_str_mv AT dessaillybenoith functionalsiteplasticityindomainsuperfamilies
AT dawsonnataliel functionalsiteplasticityindomainsuperfamilies
AT mizuguchikenji functionalsiteplasticityindomainsuperfamilies
AT orengochristinea functionalsiteplasticityindomainsuperfamilies