Cargando…

Ligand Pose and Orientational Sampling in Molecular Docking

Molecular docking remains an important tool for structure-based screening to find new ligands and chemical probes. As docking ambitions grow to include new scoring function terms, and to address ever more targets, the reliability and extendability of the orientation sampling, and the throughput of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coleman, Ryan G., Carchia, Michael, Sterling, Teague, Irwin, John J., Shoichet, Brian K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075992
_version_ 1782286256794763264
author Coleman, Ryan G.
Carchia, Michael
Sterling, Teague
Irwin, John J.
Shoichet, Brian K.
author_facet Coleman, Ryan G.
Carchia, Michael
Sterling, Teague
Irwin, John J.
Shoichet, Brian K.
author_sort Coleman, Ryan G.
collection PubMed
description Molecular docking remains an important tool for structure-based screening to find new ligands and chemical probes. As docking ambitions grow to include new scoring function terms, and to address ever more targets, the reliability and extendability of the orientation sampling, and the throughput of the method, become pressing. Here we explore sampling techniques that eliminate stochastic behavior in DOCK3.6, allowing us to optimize the method for regularly variable sampling of orientations. This also enabled a focused effort to optimize the code for efficiency, with a three-fold increase in the speed of the program. This, in turn, facilitated extensive testing of the method on the 102 targets, 22,805 ligands and 1,411,214 decoys of the Directory of Useful Decoys - Enhanced (DUD-E) benchmarking set, at multiple levels of sampling. Encouragingly, we observe that as sampling increases from 50 to 500 to 2000 to 5000 to 20000 molecular orientations in the binding site (and so from about 1×10(10) to 4×10(10) to 1×10(11) to 2×10(11) to 5×10(11) mean atoms scored per target, since multiple conformations are sampled per orientation), the enrichment of ligands over decoys monotonically increases for most DUD-E targets. Meanwhile, including internal electrostatics in the evaluation ligand conformational energies, and restricting aromatic hydroxyls to low energy rotamers, further improved enrichment values. Several of the strategies used here to improve the efficiency of the code are broadly applicable in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3787967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37879672013-10-04 Ligand Pose and Orientational Sampling in Molecular Docking Coleman, Ryan G. Carchia, Michael Sterling, Teague Irwin, John J. Shoichet, Brian K. PLoS One Research Article Molecular docking remains an important tool for structure-based screening to find new ligands and chemical probes. As docking ambitions grow to include new scoring function terms, and to address ever more targets, the reliability and extendability of the orientation sampling, and the throughput of the method, become pressing. Here we explore sampling techniques that eliminate stochastic behavior in DOCK3.6, allowing us to optimize the method for regularly variable sampling of orientations. This also enabled a focused effort to optimize the code for efficiency, with a three-fold increase in the speed of the program. This, in turn, facilitated extensive testing of the method on the 102 targets, 22,805 ligands and 1,411,214 decoys of the Directory of Useful Decoys - Enhanced (DUD-E) benchmarking set, at multiple levels of sampling. Encouragingly, we observe that as sampling increases from 50 to 500 to 2000 to 5000 to 20000 molecular orientations in the binding site (and so from about 1×10(10) to 4×10(10) to 1×10(11) to 2×10(11) to 5×10(11) mean atoms scored per target, since multiple conformations are sampled per orientation), the enrichment of ligands over decoys monotonically increases for most DUD-E targets. Meanwhile, including internal electrostatics in the evaluation ligand conformational energies, and restricting aromatic hydroxyls to low energy rotamers, further improved enrichment values. Several of the strategies used here to improve the efficiency of the code are broadly applicable in the field. Public Library of Science 2013-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3787967/ /pubmed/24098414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075992 Text en © 2013 Coleman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Coleman, Ryan G.
Carchia, Michael
Sterling, Teague
Irwin, John J.
Shoichet, Brian K.
Ligand Pose and Orientational Sampling in Molecular Docking
title Ligand Pose and Orientational Sampling in Molecular Docking
title_full Ligand Pose and Orientational Sampling in Molecular Docking
title_fullStr Ligand Pose and Orientational Sampling in Molecular Docking
title_full_unstemmed Ligand Pose and Orientational Sampling in Molecular Docking
title_short Ligand Pose and Orientational Sampling in Molecular Docking
title_sort ligand pose and orientational sampling in molecular docking
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3787967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075992
work_keys_str_mv AT colemanryang ligandposeandorientationalsamplinginmoleculardocking
AT carchiamichael ligandposeandorientationalsamplinginmoleculardocking
AT sterlingteague ligandposeandorientationalsamplinginmoleculardocking
AT irwinjohnj ligandposeandorientationalsamplinginmoleculardocking
AT shoichetbriank ligandposeandorientationalsamplinginmoleculardocking