Cargando…
Evaluation of bone healing in canine tibial defects filled with cortical autograft, commercial-DBM, calf fetal DBM, omentum and omentum-calf fetal DBM
The present study was conducted to compare the effects of xenogenic bovine fetal demineralized bone matrix (DBM), commercial DBM, omentum, omentum-calf fetal DBM, cortical autograft and xenogenic cartilage powder on the healing of tibial defects in a dog model to determine the best material for bone...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Veterinary Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3788160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23820162 http://dx.doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2013.14.3.337 |
_version_ | 1782286281864118272 |
---|---|
author | Bigham-Sadegh, Amin Karimi, Iraj Alebouye, Mahsa Shafie-Sarvestani, Zahra Oryan, Ahmad |
author_facet | Bigham-Sadegh, Amin Karimi, Iraj Alebouye, Mahsa Shafie-Sarvestani, Zahra Oryan, Ahmad |
author_sort | Bigham-Sadegh, Amin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study was conducted to compare the effects of xenogenic bovine fetal demineralized bone matrix (DBM), commercial DBM, omentum, omentum-calf fetal DBM, cortical autograft and xenogenic cartilage powder on the healing of tibial defects in a dog model to determine the best material for bone healing. Seven male adult mongrel dogs, weighing 26.2 ± 2.5 kg, were used in this study. Seven holes with a diameter of 4-mm were created and then filled with several biomaterials. Radiographs were taken postoperatively on day 1 and weeks 2, 4, 6, 8. The operated tibias were removed on the 56th postoperative day and histopathologically evaluated. On postoperative days 14, 42 and 56, the lesions of the control group were significantly inferior to those in the other group (p < 0.05). On the 28th postoperative day, the autograft group was significantly superior to the control and omentum groups (p < 0.05). Moreover, calf fetal DBM was significantly superior to the control group. There was no significant difference between the histopathological sections of all groups. Overall, the omentum and omentum-DBM groups were superior to the control group, but inferior to the autograft, commercial-DBM, calf fetal DBM and calf fetal cartilage groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3788160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Veterinary Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37881602013-10-04 Evaluation of bone healing in canine tibial defects filled with cortical autograft, commercial-DBM, calf fetal DBM, omentum and omentum-calf fetal DBM Bigham-Sadegh, Amin Karimi, Iraj Alebouye, Mahsa Shafie-Sarvestani, Zahra Oryan, Ahmad J Vet Sci Original Article The present study was conducted to compare the effects of xenogenic bovine fetal demineralized bone matrix (DBM), commercial DBM, omentum, omentum-calf fetal DBM, cortical autograft and xenogenic cartilage powder on the healing of tibial defects in a dog model to determine the best material for bone healing. Seven male adult mongrel dogs, weighing 26.2 ± 2.5 kg, were used in this study. Seven holes with a diameter of 4-mm were created and then filled with several biomaterials. Radiographs were taken postoperatively on day 1 and weeks 2, 4, 6, 8. The operated tibias were removed on the 56th postoperative day and histopathologically evaluated. On postoperative days 14, 42 and 56, the lesions of the control group were significantly inferior to those in the other group (p < 0.05). On the 28th postoperative day, the autograft group was significantly superior to the control and omentum groups (p < 0.05). Moreover, calf fetal DBM was significantly superior to the control group. There was no significant difference between the histopathological sections of all groups. Overall, the omentum and omentum-DBM groups were superior to the control group, but inferior to the autograft, commercial-DBM, calf fetal DBM and calf fetal cartilage groups. The Korean Society of Veterinary Science 2013-09 2013-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3788160/ /pubmed/23820162 http://dx.doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2013.14.3.337 Text en © 2013 The Korean Society of Veterinary Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bigham-Sadegh, Amin Karimi, Iraj Alebouye, Mahsa Shafie-Sarvestani, Zahra Oryan, Ahmad Evaluation of bone healing in canine tibial defects filled with cortical autograft, commercial-DBM, calf fetal DBM, omentum and omentum-calf fetal DBM |
title | Evaluation of bone healing in canine tibial defects filled with cortical autograft, commercial-DBM, calf fetal DBM, omentum and omentum-calf fetal DBM |
title_full | Evaluation of bone healing in canine tibial defects filled with cortical autograft, commercial-DBM, calf fetal DBM, omentum and omentum-calf fetal DBM |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of bone healing in canine tibial defects filled with cortical autograft, commercial-DBM, calf fetal DBM, omentum and omentum-calf fetal DBM |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of bone healing in canine tibial defects filled with cortical autograft, commercial-DBM, calf fetal DBM, omentum and omentum-calf fetal DBM |
title_short | Evaluation of bone healing in canine tibial defects filled with cortical autograft, commercial-DBM, calf fetal DBM, omentum and omentum-calf fetal DBM |
title_sort | evaluation of bone healing in canine tibial defects filled with cortical autograft, commercial-dbm, calf fetal dbm, omentum and omentum-calf fetal dbm |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3788160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23820162 http://dx.doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2013.14.3.337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bighamsadeghamin evaluationofbonehealingincaninetibialdefectsfilledwithcorticalautograftcommercialdbmcalffetaldbmomentumandomentumcalffetaldbm AT karimiiraj evaluationofbonehealingincaninetibialdefectsfilledwithcorticalautograftcommercialdbmcalffetaldbmomentumandomentumcalffetaldbm AT alebouyemahsa evaluationofbonehealingincaninetibialdefectsfilledwithcorticalautograftcommercialdbmcalffetaldbmomentumandomentumcalffetaldbm AT shafiesarvestanizahra evaluationofbonehealingincaninetibialdefectsfilledwithcorticalautograftcommercialdbmcalffetaldbmomentumandomentumcalffetaldbm AT oryanahmad evaluationofbonehealingincaninetibialdefectsfilledwithcorticalautograftcommercialdbmcalffetaldbmomentumandomentumcalffetaldbm |