Cargando…

Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes

Since the first procedure performed in 2000, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been rapidly gaining increasing acceptance from both urologists and patients. Today, RARP is the dominant treatment option for localised prostate cancer (PCa) in the United States, despite the absence of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cozzi, Gabriele, Lorenzis, Elisa De, Palumbo, Carlotta, Acquati, Pietro, Albo, Giancarlo, dell’Orto, Paolo, Grasso, Angelica, Rocco, Bernardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3788169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24101944
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2013.355
_version_ 1782286283906744320
author Cozzi, Gabriele
Lorenzis, Elisa De
Palumbo, Carlotta
Acquati, Pietro
Albo, Giancarlo
dell’Orto, Paolo
Grasso, Angelica
Rocco, Bernardo
author_facet Cozzi, Gabriele
Lorenzis, Elisa De
Palumbo, Carlotta
Acquati, Pietro
Albo, Giancarlo
dell’Orto, Paolo
Grasso, Angelica
Rocco, Bernardo
author_sort Cozzi, Gabriele
collection PubMed
description Since the first procedure performed in 2000, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been rapidly gaining increasing acceptance from both urologists and patients. Today, RARP is the dominant treatment option for localised prostate cancer (PCa) in the United States, despite the absence of any prospective randomised trial comparing RARP with other procedures. Robotic systems have been introduced in an attempt to reduce the difficulty involved in performing complex laparoscopic procedures and the related steep learning curve. The recognised advantages of this kind of minimally invasive surgery are three-dimensional (3D) vision, ten-fold magnification, Endowrist technology with seven degrees of freedom, and tremor filtration. In this article, we examine this technique and report its functional (in terms of urinary continence and potency) and oncologic results. We also evaluate the potential advantages of RARP in comparison with open and laparoscopic procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3788169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37881692013-10-07 Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes Cozzi, Gabriele Lorenzis, Elisa De Palumbo, Carlotta Acquati, Pietro Albo, Giancarlo dell’Orto, Paolo Grasso, Angelica Rocco, Bernardo Ecancermedicalscience Review Since the first procedure performed in 2000, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been rapidly gaining increasing acceptance from both urologists and patients. Today, RARP is the dominant treatment option for localised prostate cancer (PCa) in the United States, despite the absence of any prospective randomised trial comparing RARP with other procedures. Robotic systems have been introduced in an attempt to reduce the difficulty involved in performing complex laparoscopic procedures and the related steep learning curve. The recognised advantages of this kind of minimally invasive surgery are three-dimensional (3D) vision, ten-fold magnification, Endowrist technology with seven degrees of freedom, and tremor filtration. In this article, we examine this technique and report its functional (in terms of urinary continence and potency) and oncologic results. We also evaluate the potential advantages of RARP in comparison with open and laparoscopic procedures. Cancer Intelligence 2013-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3788169/ /pubmed/24101944 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2013.355 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Cozzi, Gabriele
Lorenzis, Elisa De
Palumbo, Carlotta
Acquati, Pietro
Albo, Giancarlo
dell’Orto, Paolo
Grasso, Angelica
Rocco, Bernardo
Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes
title Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes
title_full Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes
title_fullStr Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes
title_short Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes
title_sort robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3788169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24101944
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2013.355
work_keys_str_mv AT cozzigabriele roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes
AT lorenziselisade roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes
AT palumbocarlotta roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes
AT acquatipietro roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes
AT albogiancarlo roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes
AT dellortopaolo roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes
AT grassoangelica roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes
AT roccobernardo roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes