Cargando…
Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes
Since the first procedure performed in 2000, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been rapidly gaining increasing acceptance from both urologists and patients. Today, RARP is the dominant treatment option for localised prostate cancer (PCa) in the United States, despite the absence of a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cancer Intelligence
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3788169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24101944 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2013.355 |
_version_ | 1782286283906744320 |
---|---|
author | Cozzi, Gabriele Lorenzis, Elisa De Palumbo, Carlotta Acquati, Pietro Albo, Giancarlo dell’Orto, Paolo Grasso, Angelica Rocco, Bernardo |
author_facet | Cozzi, Gabriele Lorenzis, Elisa De Palumbo, Carlotta Acquati, Pietro Albo, Giancarlo dell’Orto, Paolo Grasso, Angelica Rocco, Bernardo |
author_sort | Cozzi, Gabriele |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the first procedure performed in 2000, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been rapidly gaining increasing acceptance from both urologists and patients. Today, RARP is the dominant treatment option for localised prostate cancer (PCa) in the United States, despite the absence of any prospective randomised trial comparing RARP with other procedures. Robotic systems have been introduced in an attempt to reduce the difficulty involved in performing complex laparoscopic procedures and the related steep learning curve. The recognised advantages of this kind of minimally invasive surgery are three-dimensional (3D) vision, ten-fold magnification, Endowrist technology with seven degrees of freedom, and tremor filtration. In this article, we examine this technique and report its functional (in terms of urinary continence and potency) and oncologic results. We also evaluate the potential advantages of RARP in comparison with open and laparoscopic procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3788169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Cancer Intelligence |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37881692013-10-07 Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes Cozzi, Gabriele Lorenzis, Elisa De Palumbo, Carlotta Acquati, Pietro Albo, Giancarlo dell’Orto, Paolo Grasso, Angelica Rocco, Bernardo Ecancermedicalscience Review Since the first procedure performed in 2000, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been rapidly gaining increasing acceptance from both urologists and patients. Today, RARP is the dominant treatment option for localised prostate cancer (PCa) in the United States, despite the absence of any prospective randomised trial comparing RARP with other procedures. Robotic systems have been introduced in an attempt to reduce the difficulty involved in performing complex laparoscopic procedures and the related steep learning curve. The recognised advantages of this kind of minimally invasive surgery are three-dimensional (3D) vision, ten-fold magnification, Endowrist technology with seven degrees of freedom, and tremor filtration. In this article, we examine this technique and report its functional (in terms of urinary continence and potency) and oncologic results. We also evaluate the potential advantages of RARP in comparison with open and laparoscopic procedures. Cancer Intelligence 2013-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3788169/ /pubmed/24101944 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2013.355 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Cozzi, Gabriele Lorenzis, Elisa De Palumbo, Carlotta Acquati, Pietro Albo, Giancarlo dell’Orto, Paolo Grasso, Angelica Rocco, Bernardo Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes |
title | Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes |
title_full | Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes |
title_fullStr | Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes |
title_short | Robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes |
title_sort | robotic prostatectomy: an update on functional and oncologic outcomes |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3788169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24101944 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2013.355 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cozzigabriele roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes AT lorenziselisade roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes AT palumbocarlotta roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes AT acquatipietro roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes AT albogiancarlo roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes AT dellortopaolo roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes AT grassoangelica roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes AT roccobernardo roboticprostatectomyanupdateonfunctionalandoncologicoutcomes |