Cargando…
Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery
In urology, the main use for the robotic technique has been in radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Robotic surgery for other organs, such as the kidneys and bladder, has been less explored. However, partial nephrectomy or radical nephroureterectomy can be difficult for inexperienced laparosco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cancer Intelligence
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3788173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24101943 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2013.354 |
_version_ | 1782286284605095936 |
---|---|
author | De Lorenzis, Elisa Palumbo, Carlotta Cozzi, Gabriele Talso, Michele Rosso, Marco Costa, Beatrice Gadda, Franco Rocco, Bernardo |
author_facet | De Lorenzis, Elisa Palumbo, Carlotta Cozzi, Gabriele Talso, Michele Rosso, Marco Costa, Beatrice Gadda, Franco Rocco, Bernardo |
author_sort | De Lorenzis, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | In urology, the main use for the robotic technique has been in radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Robotic surgery for other organs, such as the kidneys and bladder, has been less explored. However, partial nephrectomy or radical nephroureterectomy can be difficult for inexperienced laparoscopic surgeons. The advent of the da Vinci robot, with multijointed endowristed instruments and stereoscopic vision, decreases the technical difficulty of intracorporeal suturing and improves the reconstructive steps. The objective of this article is to offer an overview of all robotic procedures recently developed in the field of urology. We evaluate the feasibility of these procedures and their potential advantages and disadvantages. We also describe perioperative, postoperative, and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted surgery as well as perform a comparison with open and laparoscopic techniques. Comparative data and an adequate follow-up are needed to demonstrate equivalent oncologic outcomes in comparison with traditional open or laparoscopic procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3788173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Cancer Intelligence |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37881732013-10-07 Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery De Lorenzis, Elisa Palumbo, Carlotta Cozzi, Gabriele Talso, Michele Rosso, Marco Costa, Beatrice Gadda, Franco Rocco, Bernardo Ecancermedicalscience Review In urology, the main use for the robotic technique has been in radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Robotic surgery for other organs, such as the kidneys and bladder, has been less explored. However, partial nephrectomy or radical nephroureterectomy can be difficult for inexperienced laparoscopic surgeons. The advent of the da Vinci robot, with multijointed endowristed instruments and stereoscopic vision, decreases the technical difficulty of intracorporeal suturing and improves the reconstructive steps. The objective of this article is to offer an overview of all robotic procedures recently developed in the field of urology. We evaluate the feasibility of these procedures and their potential advantages and disadvantages. We also describe perioperative, postoperative, and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted surgery as well as perform a comparison with open and laparoscopic techniques. Comparative data and an adequate follow-up are needed to demonstrate equivalent oncologic outcomes in comparison with traditional open or laparoscopic procedures. Cancer Intelligence 2013-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3788173/ /pubmed/24101943 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2013.354 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review De Lorenzis, Elisa Palumbo, Carlotta Cozzi, Gabriele Talso, Michele Rosso, Marco Costa, Beatrice Gadda, Franco Rocco, Bernardo Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery |
title | Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery |
title_full | Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery |
title_fullStr | Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery |
title_short | Robotics in uro-oncologic surgery |
title_sort | robotics in uro-oncologic surgery |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3788173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24101943 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2013.354 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delorenziselisa roboticsinurooncologicsurgery AT palumbocarlotta roboticsinurooncologicsurgery AT cozzigabriele roboticsinurooncologicsurgery AT talsomichele roboticsinurooncologicsurgery AT rossomarco roboticsinurooncologicsurgery AT costabeatrice roboticsinurooncologicsurgery AT gaddafranco roboticsinurooncologicsurgery AT roccobernardo roboticsinurooncologicsurgery |