Cargando…
Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis
Objective To estimate the disease burden of the most important complications of postoperative abdominal adhesions: small bowel obstruction, difficulties at reoperation, infertility, and chronic pain. Design Systematic review and meta-analyses. Data sources Searches of PubMed, Embase, and Central, fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24092941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5588 |
_version_ | 1782286465525350400 |
---|---|
author | ten Broek, Richard P G Issa, Yama van Santbrink, Evert J P Bouvy, Nicole D Kruitwagen, Roy F P M Jeekel, Johannes Bakkum, Erica A Rovers, Maroeska M van Goor, Harry |
author_facet | ten Broek, Richard P G Issa, Yama van Santbrink, Evert J P Bouvy, Nicole D Kruitwagen, Roy F P M Jeekel, Johannes Bakkum, Erica A Rovers, Maroeska M van Goor, Harry |
author_sort | ten Broek, Richard P G |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To estimate the disease burden of the most important complications of postoperative abdominal adhesions: small bowel obstruction, difficulties at reoperation, infertility, and chronic pain. Design Systematic review and meta-analyses. Data sources Searches of PubMed, Embase, and Central, from January 1990 to December 2012, without restrictions to publication status or language. Study selection All types of studies reporting on the incidence of adhesion related complications were considered. Data extraction and analysis The primary outcome was the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction in patients with a history of abdominal surgery. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of small bowel obstruction by any cause, difference in operative time, enterotomy during adhesiolysis, and pregnancy rate after abdominal surgery. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were done to study the robustness of the results. A random effects model was used to account for heterogeneity between studies. Results We identified 196 eligible papers. Heterogeneity was considerable for almost all meta-analyses. The origin of heterogeneity could not be explained by study design, study quality, publication date, anatomical site of operation, or operative technique. The incidence of small bowel obstruction by any cause after abdominal surgery was 9% (95% confidence interval 7% to 10%; I(2)=99%). the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction was 2% (2% to 3%; I(2)=93%); presence of adhesions was generally confirmed by emergent reoperation. In patients with a known cause of small bowel obstruction, adhesions were the single most common cause (56%, 49% to 64%; I(2)=96%). Operative time was prolonged by 15 minutes (95% confidence interval 9.3 to 21.1 minutes; I(2)=85%) in patients with previous surgery. Use of adhesiolysis resulted in a 6% (4% to 8%; I(2)=89%) incidence of iatrogenic bowel injury. The pregnancy rate after colorectal surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was 50% (37% to 63%; I(2)=94%), which was significantly lower than the pregnancy rate in medically treated patients (82%, 70% to 94%; I(2)=97%). Conclusions This review provides detailed and systematically analysed knowledge of the disease burden of adhesions. Complications of postoperative adhesion formation are frequent, have a large negative effect on patients’ health, and increase workload in clinical practice. The quantitative effects should be interpreted with caution owing to large heterogeneity. Registration The review protocol was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42012003180). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3789584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37895842013-10-03 Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis ten Broek, Richard P G Issa, Yama van Santbrink, Evert J P Bouvy, Nicole D Kruitwagen, Roy F P M Jeekel, Johannes Bakkum, Erica A Rovers, Maroeska M van Goor, Harry BMJ Research Objective To estimate the disease burden of the most important complications of postoperative abdominal adhesions: small bowel obstruction, difficulties at reoperation, infertility, and chronic pain. Design Systematic review and meta-analyses. Data sources Searches of PubMed, Embase, and Central, from January 1990 to December 2012, without restrictions to publication status or language. Study selection All types of studies reporting on the incidence of adhesion related complications were considered. Data extraction and analysis The primary outcome was the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction in patients with a history of abdominal surgery. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of small bowel obstruction by any cause, difference in operative time, enterotomy during adhesiolysis, and pregnancy rate after abdominal surgery. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were done to study the robustness of the results. A random effects model was used to account for heterogeneity between studies. Results We identified 196 eligible papers. Heterogeneity was considerable for almost all meta-analyses. The origin of heterogeneity could not be explained by study design, study quality, publication date, anatomical site of operation, or operative technique. The incidence of small bowel obstruction by any cause after abdominal surgery was 9% (95% confidence interval 7% to 10%; I(2)=99%). the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction was 2% (2% to 3%; I(2)=93%); presence of adhesions was generally confirmed by emergent reoperation. In patients with a known cause of small bowel obstruction, adhesions were the single most common cause (56%, 49% to 64%; I(2)=96%). Operative time was prolonged by 15 minutes (95% confidence interval 9.3 to 21.1 minutes; I(2)=85%) in patients with previous surgery. Use of adhesiolysis resulted in a 6% (4% to 8%; I(2)=89%) incidence of iatrogenic bowel injury. The pregnancy rate after colorectal surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was 50% (37% to 63%; I(2)=94%), which was significantly lower than the pregnancy rate in medically treated patients (82%, 70% to 94%; I(2)=97%). Conclusions This review provides detailed and systematically analysed knowledge of the disease burden of adhesions. Complications of postoperative adhesion formation are frequent, have a large negative effect on patients’ health, and increase workload in clinical practice. The quantitative effects should be interpreted with caution owing to large heterogeneity. Registration The review protocol was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42012003180). BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3789584/ /pubmed/24092941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5588 Text en © ten Broek et al 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research ten Broek, Richard P G Issa, Yama van Santbrink, Evert J P Bouvy, Nicole D Kruitwagen, Roy F P M Jeekel, Johannes Bakkum, Erica A Rovers, Maroeska M van Goor, Harry Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis |
title | Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis |
title_full | Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis |
title_fullStr | Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis |
title_short | Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis |
title_sort | burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24092941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tenbroekrichardpg burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT issayama burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT vansantbrinkevertjp burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT bouvynicoled burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT kruitwagenroyfpm burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT jeekeljohannes burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT bakkumericaa burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT roversmaroeskam burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis AT vangoorharry burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis |