Cargando…

Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis

Objective To estimate the disease burden of the most important complications of postoperative abdominal adhesions: small bowel obstruction, difficulties at reoperation, infertility, and chronic pain. Design Systematic review and meta-analyses. Data sources Searches of PubMed, Embase, and Central, fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ten Broek, Richard P G, Issa, Yama, van Santbrink, Evert J P, Bouvy, Nicole D, Kruitwagen, Roy F P M, Jeekel, Johannes, Bakkum, Erica A, Rovers, Maroeska M, van Goor, Harry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24092941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5588
_version_ 1782286465525350400
author ten Broek, Richard P G
Issa, Yama
van Santbrink, Evert J P
Bouvy, Nicole D
Kruitwagen, Roy F P M
Jeekel, Johannes
Bakkum, Erica A
Rovers, Maroeska M
van Goor, Harry
author_facet ten Broek, Richard P G
Issa, Yama
van Santbrink, Evert J P
Bouvy, Nicole D
Kruitwagen, Roy F P M
Jeekel, Johannes
Bakkum, Erica A
Rovers, Maroeska M
van Goor, Harry
author_sort ten Broek, Richard P G
collection PubMed
description Objective To estimate the disease burden of the most important complications of postoperative abdominal adhesions: small bowel obstruction, difficulties at reoperation, infertility, and chronic pain. Design Systematic review and meta-analyses. Data sources Searches of PubMed, Embase, and Central, from January 1990 to December 2012, without restrictions to publication status or language. Study selection All types of studies reporting on the incidence of adhesion related complications were considered. Data extraction and analysis The primary outcome was the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction in patients with a history of abdominal surgery. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of small bowel obstruction by any cause, difference in operative time, enterotomy during adhesiolysis, and pregnancy rate after abdominal surgery. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were done to study the robustness of the results. A random effects model was used to account for heterogeneity between studies. Results We identified 196 eligible papers. Heterogeneity was considerable for almost all meta-analyses. The origin of heterogeneity could not be explained by study design, study quality, publication date, anatomical site of operation, or operative technique. The incidence of small bowel obstruction by any cause after abdominal surgery was 9% (95% confidence interval 7% to 10%; I(2)=99%). the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction was 2% (2% to 3%; I(2)=93%); presence of adhesions was generally confirmed by emergent reoperation. In patients with a known cause of small bowel obstruction, adhesions were the single most common cause (56%, 49% to 64%; I(2)=96%). Operative time was prolonged by 15 minutes (95% confidence interval 9.3 to 21.1 minutes; I(2)=85%) in patients with previous surgery. Use of adhesiolysis resulted in a 6% (4% to 8%; I(2)=89%) incidence of iatrogenic bowel injury. The pregnancy rate after colorectal surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was 50% (37% to 63%; I(2)=94%), which was significantly lower than the pregnancy rate in medically treated patients (82%, 70% to 94%; I(2)=97%). Conclusions This review provides detailed and systematically analysed knowledge of the disease burden of adhesions. Complications of postoperative adhesion formation are frequent, have a large negative effect on patients’ health, and increase workload in clinical practice. The quantitative effects should be interpreted with caution owing to large heterogeneity. Registration The review protocol was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42012003180).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3789584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37895842013-10-03 Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis ten Broek, Richard P G Issa, Yama van Santbrink, Evert J P Bouvy, Nicole D Kruitwagen, Roy F P M Jeekel, Johannes Bakkum, Erica A Rovers, Maroeska M van Goor, Harry BMJ Research Objective To estimate the disease burden of the most important complications of postoperative abdominal adhesions: small bowel obstruction, difficulties at reoperation, infertility, and chronic pain. Design Systematic review and meta-analyses. Data sources Searches of PubMed, Embase, and Central, from January 1990 to December 2012, without restrictions to publication status or language. Study selection All types of studies reporting on the incidence of adhesion related complications were considered. Data extraction and analysis The primary outcome was the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction in patients with a history of abdominal surgery. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of small bowel obstruction by any cause, difference in operative time, enterotomy during adhesiolysis, and pregnancy rate after abdominal surgery. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were done to study the robustness of the results. A random effects model was used to account for heterogeneity between studies. Results We identified 196 eligible papers. Heterogeneity was considerable for almost all meta-analyses. The origin of heterogeneity could not be explained by study design, study quality, publication date, anatomical site of operation, or operative technique. The incidence of small bowel obstruction by any cause after abdominal surgery was 9% (95% confidence interval 7% to 10%; I(2)=99%). the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction was 2% (2% to 3%; I(2)=93%); presence of adhesions was generally confirmed by emergent reoperation. In patients with a known cause of small bowel obstruction, adhesions were the single most common cause (56%, 49% to 64%; I(2)=96%). Operative time was prolonged by 15 minutes (95% confidence interval 9.3 to 21.1 minutes; I(2)=85%) in patients with previous surgery. Use of adhesiolysis resulted in a 6% (4% to 8%; I(2)=89%) incidence of iatrogenic bowel injury. The pregnancy rate after colorectal surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was 50% (37% to 63%; I(2)=94%), which was significantly lower than the pregnancy rate in medically treated patients (82%, 70% to 94%; I(2)=97%). Conclusions This review provides detailed and systematically analysed knowledge of the disease burden of adhesions. Complications of postoperative adhesion formation are frequent, have a large negative effect on patients’ health, and increase workload in clinical practice. The quantitative effects should be interpreted with caution owing to large heterogeneity. Registration The review protocol was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42012003180). BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3789584/ /pubmed/24092941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5588 Text en © ten Broek et al 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
ten Broek, Richard P G
Issa, Yama
van Santbrink, Evert J P
Bouvy, Nicole D
Kruitwagen, Roy F P M
Jeekel, Johannes
Bakkum, Erica A
Rovers, Maroeska M
van Goor, Harry
Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis
title Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis
title_full Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis
title_fullStr Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis
title_short Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis
title_sort burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24092941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5588
work_keys_str_mv AT tenbroekrichardpg burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis
AT issayama burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis
AT vansantbrinkevertjp burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis
AT bouvynicoled burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis
AT kruitwagenroyfpm burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis
AT jeekeljohannes burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis
AT bakkumericaa burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis
AT roversmaroeskam burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis
AT vangoorharry burdenofadhesionsinabdominalandpelvicsurgerysystematicreviewandmetanalysis