Cargando…
Bee Products Prevent Agrichemical-Induced Oxidative Damage in Fish
In southern South America and other parts of the world, aquaculture is an activity that complements agriculture. Small amounts of agrichemicals can reach aquaculture ponds, which results in numerous problems caused by oxidative stress in non-target organisms. Substances that can prevent or reverse a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074499 |
_version_ | 1782286485540569088 |
---|---|
author | Ferreira, Daiane Rocha, Helio Carlos Kreutz, Luiz Carlos Loro, Vania Lucia Marqueze, Alessandra Koakoski, Gessi Santos da Rosa, João Gabriel Gusso, Darlan Oliveira, Thiago Acosta de Abreu, Murilo Sander Barcellos, Leonardo José Gil |
author_facet | Ferreira, Daiane Rocha, Helio Carlos Kreutz, Luiz Carlos Loro, Vania Lucia Marqueze, Alessandra Koakoski, Gessi Santos da Rosa, João Gabriel Gusso, Darlan Oliveira, Thiago Acosta de Abreu, Murilo Sander Barcellos, Leonardo José Gil |
author_sort | Ferreira, Daiane |
collection | PubMed |
description | In southern South America and other parts of the world, aquaculture is an activity that complements agriculture. Small amounts of agrichemicals can reach aquaculture ponds, which results in numerous problems caused by oxidative stress in non-target organisms. Substances that can prevent or reverse agrichemical-induced oxidative damage may be used to combat these effects. This study includes four experiments. In each experiment, 96 mixed-sex, 6-month-old Rhamdia quelen (118±15 g) were distributed into eight experimental groups: a control group that was not exposed to contaminated water, three groups that were exposed to various concentrations of bee products, three groups that were exposed to various concentrations of bee products plus tebuconazole (TEB; Folicur 200 CE™) and a group that was exposed to 0.88 mg L(−1) of TEB alone (corresponding to 16.6% of the 96-h LC(50)). We show that waterborne bee products, including royal jelly (RJ), honey (H), bee pollen (BP) and propolis (P), reversed the oxidative damage caused by exposure to TEB. These effects were likely caused by the high polyphenol contents of these bee-derived compounds. The most likely mechanism of action for the protective effects of bee products against tissue oxidation and the resultant damage is that the enzymatic activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) are increased. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3789728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37897282013-10-04 Bee Products Prevent Agrichemical-Induced Oxidative Damage in Fish Ferreira, Daiane Rocha, Helio Carlos Kreutz, Luiz Carlos Loro, Vania Lucia Marqueze, Alessandra Koakoski, Gessi Santos da Rosa, João Gabriel Gusso, Darlan Oliveira, Thiago Acosta de Abreu, Murilo Sander Barcellos, Leonardo José Gil PLoS One Research Article In southern South America and other parts of the world, aquaculture is an activity that complements agriculture. Small amounts of agrichemicals can reach aquaculture ponds, which results in numerous problems caused by oxidative stress in non-target organisms. Substances that can prevent or reverse agrichemical-induced oxidative damage may be used to combat these effects. This study includes four experiments. In each experiment, 96 mixed-sex, 6-month-old Rhamdia quelen (118±15 g) were distributed into eight experimental groups: a control group that was not exposed to contaminated water, three groups that were exposed to various concentrations of bee products, three groups that were exposed to various concentrations of bee products plus tebuconazole (TEB; Folicur 200 CE™) and a group that was exposed to 0.88 mg L(−1) of TEB alone (corresponding to 16.6% of the 96-h LC(50)). We show that waterborne bee products, including royal jelly (RJ), honey (H), bee pollen (BP) and propolis (P), reversed the oxidative damage caused by exposure to TEB. These effects were likely caused by the high polyphenol contents of these bee-derived compounds. The most likely mechanism of action for the protective effects of bee products against tissue oxidation and the resultant damage is that the enzymatic activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) are increased. Public Library of Science 2013-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3789728/ /pubmed/24098336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074499 Text en © 2013 Ferreira et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ferreira, Daiane Rocha, Helio Carlos Kreutz, Luiz Carlos Loro, Vania Lucia Marqueze, Alessandra Koakoski, Gessi Santos da Rosa, João Gabriel Gusso, Darlan Oliveira, Thiago Acosta de Abreu, Murilo Sander Barcellos, Leonardo José Gil Bee Products Prevent Agrichemical-Induced Oxidative Damage in Fish |
title | Bee Products Prevent Agrichemical-Induced Oxidative Damage in Fish |
title_full | Bee Products Prevent Agrichemical-Induced Oxidative Damage in Fish |
title_fullStr | Bee Products Prevent Agrichemical-Induced Oxidative Damage in Fish |
title_full_unstemmed | Bee Products Prevent Agrichemical-Induced Oxidative Damage in Fish |
title_short | Bee Products Prevent Agrichemical-Induced Oxidative Damage in Fish |
title_sort | bee products prevent agrichemical-induced oxidative damage in fish |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074499 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferreiradaiane beeproductspreventagrichemicalinducedoxidativedamageinfish AT rochaheliocarlos beeproductspreventagrichemicalinducedoxidativedamageinfish AT kreutzluizcarlos beeproductspreventagrichemicalinducedoxidativedamageinfish AT lorovanialucia beeproductspreventagrichemicalinducedoxidativedamageinfish AT marquezealessandra beeproductspreventagrichemicalinducedoxidativedamageinfish AT koakoskigessi beeproductspreventagrichemicalinducedoxidativedamageinfish AT santosdarosajoaogabriel beeproductspreventagrichemicalinducedoxidativedamageinfish AT gussodarlan beeproductspreventagrichemicalinducedoxidativedamageinfish AT oliveirathiagoacosta beeproductspreventagrichemicalinducedoxidativedamageinfish AT deabreumurilosander beeproductspreventagrichemicalinducedoxidativedamageinfish AT barcellosleonardojosegil beeproductspreventagrichemicalinducedoxidativedamageinfish |