Cargando…
A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs
BACKGROUND: The value of integrated care through comprehensive, coordinated, and family-centered services has been increasingly recognized for improving health outcomes of children with special health care needs (CSHCN). In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the integrated care provided through th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098089 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S48870 |
_version_ | 1782286513506091008 |
---|---|
author | Ye, Chenglin Browne, Gina Beyene, Joseph Thabane, Lehana |
author_facet | Ye, Chenglin Browne, Gina Beyene, Joseph Thabane, Lehana |
author_sort | Ye, Chenglin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The value of integrated care through comprehensive, coordinated, and family-centered services has been increasingly recognized for improving health outcomes of children with special health care needs (CSHCN). In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the integrated care provided through the Children’s Treatment Network (CTN) was compared with usual care in improving the psychosocial health of target CSHCN. In this paper, we aimed to estimate the effect of CTN care by conducting multiple analyses to handle noncompliance in the trial. METHODS: The trial recruited target children in Simcoe County and York Region, ON, Canada. Children were randomized to receive CTN or usual care and were followed for 2 years. The CTN group received integrated services through multiple providers to address their specific needs while the usual care group continued to receive care directed by their parents. The outcome was change in psychosocial quality of life at 2 years. We conducted intention-to-treat, as-treated, per-protocol, and instrumental variable analyses to analyze the outcome. RESULTS: The trial randomized 445 children, with 229 in the intervention group and 216 in the control group. During follow-up, 52% of children in the intervention group did not receive complete CTN care for various reasons. At 2 years, we did not find a significant improvement in psychosocial quality of life among the children receiving CTN care compared with usual care (intention-to-treat mean difference 1.50, 95% confidence interval −1.49 to 4.50; P = 0.32). Other methods of analysis yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: Although the effect of CTN care was not significant, there was evidence showing benefits of integrated care for CSHCN. More RCTs are needed to demonstrate the magnitude of such an effect. The CTN study highlights the key challenges in RCTs when assessing interventions involving integrated care, and informs further RCTs including similar evaluations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3789843 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37898432013-10-04 A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs Ye, Chenglin Browne, Gina Beyene, Joseph Thabane, Lehana Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: The value of integrated care through comprehensive, coordinated, and family-centered services has been increasingly recognized for improving health outcomes of children with special health care needs (CSHCN). In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the integrated care provided through the Children’s Treatment Network (CTN) was compared with usual care in improving the psychosocial health of target CSHCN. In this paper, we aimed to estimate the effect of CTN care by conducting multiple analyses to handle noncompliance in the trial. METHODS: The trial recruited target children in Simcoe County and York Region, ON, Canada. Children were randomized to receive CTN or usual care and were followed for 2 years. The CTN group received integrated services through multiple providers to address their specific needs while the usual care group continued to receive care directed by their parents. The outcome was change in psychosocial quality of life at 2 years. We conducted intention-to-treat, as-treated, per-protocol, and instrumental variable analyses to analyze the outcome. RESULTS: The trial randomized 445 children, with 229 in the intervention group and 216 in the control group. During follow-up, 52% of children in the intervention group did not receive complete CTN care for various reasons. At 2 years, we did not find a significant improvement in psychosocial quality of life among the children receiving CTN care compared with usual care (intention-to-treat mean difference 1.50, 95% confidence interval −1.49 to 4.50; P = 0.32). Other methods of analysis yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: Although the effect of CTN care was not significant, there was evidence showing benefits of integrated care for CSHCN. More RCTs are needed to demonstrate the magnitude of such an effect. The CTN study highlights the key challenges in RCTs when assessing interventions involving integrated care, and informs further RCTs including similar evaluations. Dove Medical Press 2013-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3789843/ /pubmed/24098089 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S48870 Text en © 2013 Ye et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Ltd, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ye, Chenglin Browne, Gina Beyene, Joseph Thabane, Lehana A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs |
title | A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs |
title_full | A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs |
title_fullStr | A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs |
title_full_unstemmed | A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs |
title_short | A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs |
title_sort | sensitivity analysis of the children’s treatment network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098089 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S48870 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yechenglin asensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds AT brownegina asensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds AT beyenejoseph asensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds AT thabanelehana asensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds AT yechenglin sensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds AT brownegina sensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds AT beyenejoseph sensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds AT thabanelehana sensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds |