Cargando…

A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs

BACKGROUND: The value of integrated care through comprehensive, coordinated, and family-centered services has been increasingly recognized for improving health outcomes of children with special health care needs (CSHCN). In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the integrated care provided through th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Chenglin, Browne, Gina, Beyene, Joseph, Thabane, Lehana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098089
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S48870
_version_ 1782286513506091008
author Ye, Chenglin
Browne, Gina
Beyene, Joseph
Thabane, Lehana
author_facet Ye, Chenglin
Browne, Gina
Beyene, Joseph
Thabane, Lehana
author_sort Ye, Chenglin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The value of integrated care through comprehensive, coordinated, and family-centered services has been increasingly recognized for improving health outcomes of children with special health care needs (CSHCN). In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the integrated care provided through the Children’s Treatment Network (CTN) was compared with usual care in improving the psychosocial health of target CSHCN. In this paper, we aimed to estimate the effect of CTN care by conducting multiple analyses to handle noncompliance in the trial. METHODS: The trial recruited target children in Simcoe County and York Region, ON, Canada. Children were randomized to receive CTN or usual care and were followed for 2 years. The CTN group received integrated services through multiple providers to address their specific needs while the usual care group continued to receive care directed by their parents. The outcome was change in psychosocial quality of life at 2 years. We conducted intention-to-treat, as-treated, per-protocol, and instrumental variable analyses to analyze the outcome. RESULTS: The trial randomized 445 children, with 229 in the intervention group and 216 in the control group. During follow-up, 52% of children in the intervention group did not receive complete CTN care for various reasons. At 2 years, we did not find a significant improvement in psychosocial quality of life among the children receiving CTN care compared with usual care (intention-to-treat mean difference 1.50, 95% confidence interval −1.49 to 4.50; P = 0.32). Other methods of analysis yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: Although the effect of CTN care was not significant, there was evidence showing benefits of integrated care for CSHCN. More RCTs are needed to demonstrate the magnitude of such an effect. The CTN study highlights the key challenges in RCTs when assessing interventions involving integrated care, and informs further RCTs including similar evaluations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3789843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37898432013-10-04 A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs Ye, Chenglin Browne, Gina Beyene, Joseph Thabane, Lehana Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: The value of integrated care through comprehensive, coordinated, and family-centered services has been increasingly recognized for improving health outcomes of children with special health care needs (CSHCN). In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the integrated care provided through the Children’s Treatment Network (CTN) was compared with usual care in improving the psychosocial health of target CSHCN. In this paper, we aimed to estimate the effect of CTN care by conducting multiple analyses to handle noncompliance in the trial. METHODS: The trial recruited target children in Simcoe County and York Region, ON, Canada. Children were randomized to receive CTN or usual care and were followed for 2 years. The CTN group received integrated services through multiple providers to address their specific needs while the usual care group continued to receive care directed by their parents. The outcome was change in psychosocial quality of life at 2 years. We conducted intention-to-treat, as-treated, per-protocol, and instrumental variable analyses to analyze the outcome. RESULTS: The trial randomized 445 children, with 229 in the intervention group and 216 in the control group. During follow-up, 52% of children in the intervention group did not receive complete CTN care for various reasons. At 2 years, we did not find a significant improvement in psychosocial quality of life among the children receiving CTN care compared with usual care (intention-to-treat mean difference 1.50, 95% confidence interval −1.49 to 4.50; P = 0.32). Other methods of analysis yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: Although the effect of CTN care was not significant, there was evidence showing benefits of integrated care for CSHCN. More RCTs are needed to demonstrate the magnitude of such an effect. The CTN study highlights the key challenges in RCTs when assessing interventions involving integrated care, and informs further RCTs including similar evaluations. Dove Medical Press 2013-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3789843/ /pubmed/24098089 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S48870 Text en © 2013 Ye et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Ltd, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ye, Chenglin
Browne, Gina
Beyene, Joseph
Thabane, Lehana
A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs
title A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs
title_full A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs
title_fullStr A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs
title_full_unstemmed A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs
title_short A sensitivity analysis of the Children’s Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs
title_sort sensitivity analysis of the children’s treatment network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098089
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S48870
work_keys_str_mv AT yechenglin asensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds
AT brownegina asensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds
AT beyenejoseph asensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds
AT thabanelehana asensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds
AT yechenglin sensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds
AT brownegina sensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds
AT beyenejoseph sensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds
AT thabanelehana sensitivityanalysisofthechildrenstreatmentnetworktrialarandomizedcontrolledtrialofintegratedservicesversususualcareforchildrenwithspecialhealthcareneeds