Cargando…
Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making
INTRODUCTION: To determine emergency physician (EP) opinions of prehospital patient care reports (PCRs) and whether such reports are available at the time of emergency department (ED) medical decision-making. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional, electronic web-based survey of EPs regarding prefere...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24106547 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.1.12665 |
_version_ | 1782286521894699008 |
---|---|
author | Bledsoe, Bryan E. Wasden, Chad Johnson, Larry |
author_facet | Bledsoe, Bryan E. Wasden, Chad Johnson, Larry |
author_sort | Bledsoe, Bryan E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To determine emergency physician (EP) opinions of prehospital patient care reports (PCRs) and whether such reports are available at the time of emergency department (ED) medical decision-making. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional, electronic web-based survey of EPs regarding preferences and availability of prehospital PCRs at the time of ED medical decision-making. RESULTS: We sent the survey to 1,932 EPs via 4 American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) email lists. As a result, 228 (11.8%) of email list members from 31 states and the District of Columbia completed the survey. Most respondents preferred electronic prehospital PCRs as opposed to handwritten prehospital PCRs (52.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 49.1, 55.3] vs. 17.1% [95%CI: 11.7, 22.5]). The remaining respondents (30.5% [95%CI: 26.0, 35.0]) had no preference or had seen only one type of PCR. Of the respondents, 45.6% [95%CI: 42.1, 48.7] stated PCRs were “very important” while 43.0% [95% CI: 39.3, 46.7] rated PCRs as “important” in their ED practice. Most respondents (79.6% [95%CI: 76.5, 82.7]) reported electronic prehospital PCRs were available ≤50% of the time for medical decision-making while 20.4% [95%CI: 9.2, 31.6] reported that electronic prehospital PCRs were available > 50% of the time (P=0.00). A majority of participants (77.6% [95%CI: 74.5, 80.7]) reported that handwritten prehospital PCRs were available ≥ 50% while 22.4% [95%CI: 11.8, 33.0] of the time for medical decision-making (P=0.00). CONCLUSION: EPs in this study felt that prehospital PCRs were important to their ED practice and preferred electronic prehospital PCRs over handwritten PCRs. However, most electronic prehospital PCRs were unavailable at the time of ED medical decision-making. Although handwritten prehospital PCRs were more readily available, legibility and accuracy were reported concerns. This study suggest that strategies should be devised to improve the overall accuracy of PCRs and assure that electronic prehospital PCRs are delivered to the receiving ED in time for consideration in ED medical decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3789913 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37899132013-10-08 Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making Bledsoe, Bryan E. Wasden, Chad Johnson, Larry West J Emerg Med Prehospital Care INTRODUCTION: To determine emergency physician (EP) opinions of prehospital patient care reports (PCRs) and whether such reports are available at the time of emergency department (ED) medical decision-making. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional, electronic web-based survey of EPs regarding preferences and availability of prehospital PCRs at the time of ED medical decision-making. RESULTS: We sent the survey to 1,932 EPs via 4 American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) email lists. As a result, 228 (11.8%) of email list members from 31 states and the District of Columbia completed the survey. Most respondents preferred electronic prehospital PCRs as opposed to handwritten prehospital PCRs (52.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 49.1, 55.3] vs. 17.1% [95%CI: 11.7, 22.5]). The remaining respondents (30.5% [95%CI: 26.0, 35.0]) had no preference or had seen only one type of PCR. Of the respondents, 45.6% [95%CI: 42.1, 48.7] stated PCRs were “very important” while 43.0% [95% CI: 39.3, 46.7] rated PCRs as “important” in their ED practice. Most respondents (79.6% [95%CI: 76.5, 82.7]) reported electronic prehospital PCRs were available ≤50% of the time for medical decision-making while 20.4% [95%CI: 9.2, 31.6] reported that electronic prehospital PCRs were available > 50% of the time (P=0.00). A majority of participants (77.6% [95%CI: 74.5, 80.7]) reported that handwritten prehospital PCRs were available ≥ 50% while 22.4% [95%CI: 11.8, 33.0] of the time for medical decision-making (P=0.00). CONCLUSION: EPs in this study felt that prehospital PCRs were important to their ED practice and preferred electronic prehospital PCRs over handwritten PCRs. However, most electronic prehospital PCRs were unavailable at the time of ED medical decision-making. Although handwritten prehospital PCRs were more readily available, legibility and accuracy were reported concerns. This study suggest that strategies should be devised to improve the overall accuracy of PCRs and assure that electronic prehospital PCRs are delivered to the receiving ED in time for consideration in ED medical decision-making. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3789913/ /pubmed/24106547 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.1.12665 Text en Copyright © 2013 the authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Prehospital Care Bledsoe, Bryan E. Wasden, Chad Johnson, Larry Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making |
title | Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making |
title_full | Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making |
title_fullStr | Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making |
title_full_unstemmed | Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making |
title_short | Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making |
title_sort | electronic prehospital records are often unavailable for emergency department medical decision making |
topic | Prehospital Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24106547 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.1.12665 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bledsoebryane electronicprehospitalrecordsareoftenunavailableforemergencydepartmentmedicaldecisionmaking AT wasdenchad electronicprehospitalrecordsareoftenunavailableforemergencydepartmentmedicaldecisionmaking AT johnsonlarry electronicprehospitalrecordsareoftenunavailableforemergencydepartmentmedicaldecisionmaking |