Cargando…

Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making

INTRODUCTION: To determine emergency physician (EP) opinions of prehospital patient care reports (PCRs) and whether such reports are available at the time of emergency department (ED) medical decision-making. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional, electronic web-based survey of EPs regarding prefere...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bledsoe, Bryan E., Wasden, Chad, Johnson, Larry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24106547
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.1.12665
_version_ 1782286521894699008
author Bledsoe, Bryan E.
Wasden, Chad
Johnson, Larry
author_facet Bledsoe, Bryan E.
Wasden, Chad
Johnson, Larry
author_sort Bledsoe, Bryan E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To determine emergency physician (EP) opinions of prehospital patient care reports (PCRs) and whether such reports are available at the time of emergency department (ED) medical decision-making. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional, electronic web-based survey of EPs regarding preferences and availability of prehospital PCRs at the time of ED medical decision-making. RESULTS: We sent the survey to 1,932 EPs via 4 American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) email lists. As a result, 228 (11.8%) of email list members from 31 states and the District of Columbia completed the survey. Most respondents preferred electronic prehospital PCRs as opposed to handwritten prehospital PCRs (52.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 49.1, 55.3] vs. 17.1% [95%CI: 11.7, 22.5]). The remaining respondents (30.5% [95%CI: 26.0, 35.0]) had no preference or had seen only one type of PCR. Of the respondents, 45.6% [95%CI: 42.1, 48.7] stated PCRs were “very important” while 43.0% [95% CI: 39.3, 46.7] rated PCRs as “important” in their ED practice. Most respondents (79.6% [95%CI: 76.5, 82.7]) reported electronic prehospital PCRs were available ≤50% of the time for medical decision-making while 20.4% [95%CI: 9.2, 31.6] reported that electronic prehospital PCRs were available > 50% of the time (P=0.00). A majority of participants (77.6% [95%CI: 74.5, 80.7]) reported that handwritten prehospital PCRs were available ≥ 50% while 22.4% [95%CI: 11.8, 33.0] of the time for medical decision-making (P=0.00). CONCLUSION: EPs in this study felt that prehospital PCRs were important to their ED practice and preferred electronic prehospital PCRs over handwritten PCRs. However, most electronic prehospital PCRs were unavailable at the time of ED medical decision-making. Although handwritten prehospital PCRs were more readily available, legibility and accuracy were reported concerns. This study suggest that strategies should be devised to improve the overall accuracy of PCRs and assure that electronic prehospital PCRs are delivered to the receiving ED in time for consideration in ED medical decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3789913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37899132013-10-08 Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making Bledsoe, Bryan E. Wasden, Chad Johnson, Larry West J Emerg Med Prehospital Care INTRODUCTION: To determine emergency physician (EP) opinions of prehospital patient care reports (PCRs) and whether such reports are available at the time of emergency department (ED) medical decision-making. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional, electronic web-based survey of EPs regarding preferences and availability of prehospital PCRs at the time of ED medical decision-making. RESULTS: We sent the survey to 1,932 EPs via 4 American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) email lists. As a result, 228 (11.8%) of email list members from 31 states and the District of Columbia completed the survey. Most respondents preferred electronic prehospital PCRs as opposed to handwritten prehospital PCRs (52.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 49.1, 55.3] vs. 17.1% [95%CI: 11.7, 22.5]). The remaining respondents (30.5% [95%CI: 26.0, 35.0]) had no preference or had seen only one type of PCR. Of the respondents, 45.6% [95%CI: 42.1, 48.7] stated PCRs were “very important” while 43.0% [95% CI: 39.3, 46.7] rated PCRs as “important” in their ED practice. Most respondents (79.6% [95%CI: 76.5, 82.7]) reported electronic prehospital PCRs were available ≤50% of the time for medical decision-making while 20.4% [95%CI: 9.2, 31.6] reported that electronic prehospital PCRs were available > 50% of the time (P=0.00). A majority of participants (77.6% [95%CI: 74.5, 80.7]) reported that handwritten prehospital PCRs were available ≥ 50% while 22.4% [95%CI: 11.8, 33.0] of the time for medical decision-making (P=0.00). CONCLUSION: EPs in this study felt that prehospital PCRs were important to their ED practice and preferred electronic prehospital PCRs over handwritten PCRs. However, most electronic prehospital PCRs were unavailable at the time of ED medical decision-making. Although handwritten prehospital PCRs were more readily available, legibility and accuracy were reported concerns. This study suggest that strategies should be devised to improve the overall accuracy of PCRs and assure that electronic prehospital PCRs are delivered to the receiving ED in time for consideration in ED medical decision-making. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3789913/ /pubmed/24106547 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.1.12665 Text en Copyright © 2013 the authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Prehospital Care
Bledsoe, Bryan E.
Wasden, Chad
Johnson, Larry
Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making
title Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making
title_full Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making
title_fullStr Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making
title_full_unstemmed Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making
title_short Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making
title_sort electronic prehospital records are often unavailable for emergency department medical decision making
topic Prehospital Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24106547
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.1.12665
work_keys_str_mv AT bledsoebryane electronicprehospitalrecordsareoftenunavailableforemergencydepartmentmedicaldecisionmaking
AT wasdenchad electronicprehospitalrecordsareoftenunavailableforemergencydepartmentmedicaldecisionmaking
AT johnsonlarry electronicprehospitalrecordsareoftenunavailableforemergencydepartmentmedicaldecisionmaking