Cargando…

How does graphotactic knowledge influence children's learning of new spellings?

Two experiments investigated whether and how the learning of spellings by French third graders is influenced by two graphotactic patterns: consonants cannot double in word-initial position (Experiment 1) and consonants cannot double after single consonants (Experiment 2). Children silently read mean...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pacton, Sébastien, Sobaco, Amélie, Fayol, Michel, Treiman, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3790077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109466
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00701
_version_ 1782286541434912768
author Pacton, Sébastien
Sobaco, Amélie
Fayol, Michel
Treiman, Rebecca
author_facet Pacton, Sébastien
Sobaco, Amélie
Fayol, Michel
Treiman, Rebecca
author_sort Pacton, Sébastien
collection PubMed
description Two experiments investigated whether and how the learning of spellings by French third graders is influenced by two graphotactic patterns: consonants cannot double in word-initial position (Experiment 1) and consonants cannot double after single consonants (Experiment 2). Children silently read meaningful texts that contained three types of novel spellings: no doublet (e.g., mupile, guprane), doublet in a legal position (e.g., muppile, gupprane), and doublet in an illegal position (e.g., mmupile, guprrane). Orthographic learning was assessed with a task of spelling to dictation. In both experiments, children recalled items without doublets better than items with doublets. In Experiment 1, children recalled spellings with a doublet in illegal word-initial position better than spellings with a doublet in legal word-medial position, and almost all misspellings involved the omission of the doublet. The fact that the graphotactic violation in an item like mmupile was in the salient initial position may explain why children often remembered both the presence and the position of the doublet. In Experiment 2, children recalled non-words with a doublet before a single consonant (legal, e.g., gupprane) better than those with a doublet after a single consonant (illegal, e.g., guprrane). Omission of the doublet was the most frequent error for both types of items. Children also made some transposition errors on items with a doublet after a single consonant, recalling for example gupprane instead of guprrane. These results suggest that, when a doublet is in the hard-to-remember medial position, children sometimes remember that an item contains a doublet but not which letter is doubled. Their knowledge that double consonants can occur before but not after single consonants leads to transposition errors on items like guprrane. These results shed new light on the conditions under which children use general knowledge about the graphotactic patterns of their writing system to reconstruct spellings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3790077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37900772013-10-09 How does graphotactic knowledge influence children's learning of new spellings? Pacton, Sébastien Sobaco, Amélie Fayol, Michel Treiman, Rebecca Front Psychol Psychology Two experiments investigated whether and how the learning of spellings by French third graders is influenced by two graphotactic patterns: consonants cannot double in word-initial position (Experiment 1) and consonants cannot double after single consonants (Experiment 2). Children silently read meaningful texts that contained three types of novel spellings: no doublet (e.g., mupile, guprane), doublet in a legal position (e.g., muppile, gupprane), and doublet in an illegal position (e.g., mmupile, guprrane). Orthographic learning was assessed with a task of spelling to dictation. In both experiments, children recalled items without doublets better than items with doublets. In Experiment 1, children recalled spellings with a doublet in illegal word-initial position better than spellings with a doublet in legal word-medial position, and almost all misspellings involved the omission of the doublet. The fact that the graphotactic violation in an item like mmupile was in the salient initial position may explain why children often remembered both the presence and the position of the doublet. In Experiment 2, children recalled non-words with a doublet before a single consonant (legal, e.g., gupprane) better than those with a doublet after a single consonant (illegal, e.g., guprrane). Omission of the doublet was the most frequent error for both types of items. Children also made some transposition errors on items with a doublet after a single consonant, recalling for example gupprane instead of guprrane. These results suggest that, when a doublet is in the hard-to-remember medial position, children sometimes remember that an item contains a doublet but not which letter is doubled. Their knowledge that double consonants can occur before but not after single consonants leads to transposition errors on items like guprrane. These results shed new light on the conditions under which children use general knowledge about the graphotactic patterns of their writing system to reconstruct spellings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3790077/ /pubmed/24109466 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00701 Text en Copyright © 2013 Pacton, Sobaco, Fayol and Treiman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Pacton, Sébastien
Sobaco, Amélie
Fayol, Michel
Treiman, Rebecca
How does graphotactic knowledge influence children's learning of new spellings?
title How does graphotactic knowledge influence children's learning of new spellings?
title_full How does graphotactic knowledge influence children's learning of new spellings?
title_fullStr How does graphotactic knowledge influence children's learning of new spellings?
title_full_unstemmed How does graphotactic knowledge influence children's learning of new spellings?
title_short How does graphotactic knowledge influence children's learning of new spellings?
title_sort how does graphotactic knowledge influence children's learning of new spellings?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3790077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109466
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00701
work_keys_str_mv AT pactonsebastien howdoesgraphotacticknowledgeinfluencechildrenslearningofnewspellings
AT sobacoamelie howdoesgraphotacticknowledgeinfluencechildrenslearningofnewspellings
AT fayolmichel howdoesgraphotacticknowledgeinfluencechildrenslearningofnewspellings
AT treimanrebecca howdoesgraphotacticknowledgeinfluencechildrenslearningofnewspellings