Cargando…
A phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of single-agent temsirolimus in chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is deregulated in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC. METHODS: In this phase II open label study, eligible patients received...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3790181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24008662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.530 |
_version_ | 1782286558040162304 |
---|---|
author | Kruczek, K Ratterman, M Tolzien, K Sulo, S Lestingi, T M Nabhan, C |
author_facet | Kruczek, K Ratterman, M Tolzien, K Sulo, S Lestingi, T M Nabhan, C |
author_sort | Kruczek, K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is deregulated in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC. METHODS: In this phase II open label study, eligible patients received IV temsirolimus at 25 mg weekly until objective disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or investigator's discretion. Toxicity was assessed every 4 weeks and responses every 8 weeks. Primary end point was calculating the overall response (OR) rate as well as measuring stable disease (SD) to assess the overall clinical benefit calculated as OR+SD. Secondary end points included prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) changes and time to progression biochemically and radiographically. Correlative studies included prospective assessment of quality of life (QoL) using two previously validated scales. RESULTS: Although the sponsor halted the study early, 21 patients were enrolled of which, 15 were evaluable for efficacy and OR. Median age was 74 (range: 57–89), median PSA was 237.5 ng ml(−1) (range: 8.2–2360), visceral disease present in 11 patients (52%), and 17 patients (81%) patients had Gleason score (7–10). Two patients had a partial response (PR) and eight had SD. The OR was 13% (2/15) and the overall clinical benefit (OR+SD) was 67% (10/15). Median time to radiographic disease progression was 2 months (range 2–10 months). Biochemical response assessment was available for 14/15 patients. Any PSA decline was observed in four patients (28.5% 4/14) with one patient (7%) having >50% PSA decline. Median time to progression by PSA was 2 months (range 1–10 months). With a median follow-up of 32 months, median overall survival (OS) was 13 months (range: 2–37) and three patients remain alive at the data cutoff (5/2013) for an OS of 14% at 4 years on an intent-to-treat analysis. Major non-haematologic toxicities included fatigue (19%) and pneumonia (14%). Main laboratory toxicities included hyperglycaemia (24%) and hypophosphatemia (14%). Also, 52% of enrolled patients had serious adverse events. Other toxicities were consistent with previously reported adverse events with temsirolimus. Despite these observed adverse events, temsirolimus did not adversely impact QoL. CONCLUSION: Temsirolimus monotherapy has minimal activity in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3790181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37901812014-10-01 A phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of single-agent temsirolimus in chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer Kruczek, K Ratterman, M Tolzien, K Sulo, S Lestingi, T M Nabhan, C Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is deregulated in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC. METHODS: In this phase II open label study, eligible patients received IV temsirolimus at 25 mg weekly until objective disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or investigator's discretion. Toxicity was assessed every 4 weeks and responses every 8 weeks. Primary end point was calculating the overall response (OR) rate as well as measuring stable disease (SD) to assess the overall clinical benefit calculated as OR+SD. Secondary end points included prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) changes and time to progression biochemically and radiographically. Correlative studies included prospective assessment of quality of life (QoL) using two previously validated scales. RESULTS: Although the sponsor halted the study early, 21 patients were enrolled of which, 15 were evaluable for efficacy and OR. Median age was 74 (range: 57–89), median PSA was 237.5 ng ml(−1) (range: 8.2–2360), visceral disease present in 11 patients (52%), and 17 patients (81%) patients had Gleason score (7–10). Two patients had a partial response (PR) and eight had SD. The OR was 13% (2/15) and the overall clinical benefit (OR+SD) was 67% (10/15). Median time to radiographic disease progression was 2 months (range 2–10 months). Biochemical response assessment was available for 14/15 patients. Any PSA decline was observed in four patients (28.5% 4/14) with one patient (7%) having >50% PSA decline. Median time to progression by PSA was 2 months (range 1–10 months). With a median follow-up of 32 months, median overall survival (OS) was 13 months (range: 2–37) and three patients remain alive at the data cutoff (5/2013) for an OS of 14% at 4 years on an intent-to-treat analysis. Major non-haematologic toxicities included fatigue (19%) and pneumonia (14%). Main laboratory toxicities included hyperglycaemia (24%) and hypophosphatemia (14%). Also, 52% of enrolled patients had serious adverse events. Other toxicities were consistent with previously reported adverse events with temsirolimus. Despite these observed adverse events, temsirolimus did not adversely impact QoL. CONCLUSION: Temsirolimus monotherapy has minimal activity in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC. Nature Publishing Group 2013-10-01 2013-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3790181/ /pubmed/24008662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.530 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Kruczek, K Ratterman, M Tolzien, K Sulo, S Lestingi, T M Nabhan, C A phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of single-agent temsirolimus in chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer |
title | A phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of single-agent temsirolimus in chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer |
title_full | A phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of single-agent temsirolimus in chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | A phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of single-agent temsirolimus in chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of single-agent temsirolimus in chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer |
title_short | A phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of single-agent temsirolimus in chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer |
title_sort | phase ii study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of single-agent temsirolimus in chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3790181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24008662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.530 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kruczekk aphaseiistudyevaluatingthetoxicityandefficacyofsingleagenttemsirolimusinchemotherapynaivecastrationresistantprostatecancer AT rattermanm aphaseiistudyevaluatingthetoxicityandefficacyofsingleagenttemsirolimusinchemotherapynaivecastrationresistantprostatecancer AT tolzienk aphaseiistudyevaluatingthetoxicityandefficacyofsingleagenttemsirolimusinchemotherapynaivecastrationresistantprostatecancer AT sulos aphaseiistudyevaluatingthetoxicityandefficacyofsingleagenttemsirolimusinchemotherapynaivecastrationresistantprostatecancer AT lestingitm aphaseiistudyevaluatingthetoxicityandefficacyofsingleagenttemsirolimusinchemotherapynaivecastrationresistantprostatecancer AT nabhanc aphaseiistudyevaluatingthetoxicityandefficacyofsingleagenttemsirolimusinchemotherapynaivecastrationresistantprostatecancer AT kruczekk phaseiistudyevaluatingthetoxicityandefficacyofsingleagenttemsirolimusinchemotherapynaivecastrationresistantprostatecancer AT rattermanm phaseiistudyevaluatingthetoxicityandefficacyofsingleagenttemsirolimusinchemotherapynaivecastrationresistantprostatecancer AT tolzienk phaseiistudyevaluatingthetoxicityandefficacyofsingleagenttemsirolimusinchemotherapynaivecastrationresistantprostatecancer AT sulos phaseiistudyevaluatingthetoxicityandefficacyofsingleagenttemsirolimusinchemotherapynaivecastrationresistantprostatecancer AT lestingitm phaseiistudyevaluatingthetoxicityandefficacyofsingleagenttemsirolimusinchemotherapynaivecastrationresistantprostatecancer AT nabhanc phaseiistudyevaluatingthetoxicityandefficacyofsingleagenttemsirolimusinchemotherapynaivecastrationresistantprostatecancer |